The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma

Despite the emergence some years ago of oncology as a veterinary specialty, there has been very little in the way of ethical debate on the use of chemotherapy in dogs. The purpose of this article is to undertake an ethical analysis to critically examine the use of chemotherapy to prolong the life of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tanya Stephens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/7/441
_version_ 1818509225129672704
author Tanya Stephens
author_facet Tanya Stephens
author_sort Tanya Stephens
collection DOAJ
description Despite the emergence some years ago of oncology as a veterinary specialty, there has been very little in the way of ethical debate on the use of chemotherapy in dogs. The purpose of this article is to undertake an ethical analysis to critically examine the use of chemotherapy to prolong the life of dogs suffering from cancer. If dogs have no concept of the future and are likely to suffer at least some adverse effects with such treatments, consideration should be given as to whether it is ethical and in the animal’s best interests to use chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic drugs are mutagenic, carcinogenic, teratogenic and may be irritant. Furthermore, chemotherapy may involve multiple trips to the veterinarian, multiple procedures and periods in isolation. Cancer-associated pain has been shown to be under-diagnosed and pet owners overestimate the effects of chemotherapy on treatment survival time. Of additional concern is the public health risks associated with chemotherapeutic drugs. As chemotherapy is not generally considered curative, it is in effect palliative care. However, palliative care may not be in the best interests of a terminally ill animal. As the specialty of veterinary oncology continues to grow and as the use of chemotherapy becomes more commonplace in the treatment of animals with cancer, it is imperative that there is an ongoing ethical debate on the use of chemotherapy in animals.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T22:42:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3f4dfeb91b547b786b3000badf5136b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T22:42:32Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-a3f4dfeb91b547b786b3000badf5136b2022-12-22T01:30:40ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152019-07-019744110.3390/ani9070441ani9070441The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical DilemmaTanya Stephens0Haberfield Veterinary Hospital, Haberfield, NSW 2045, AustraliaDespite the emergence some years ago of oncology as a veterinary specialty, there has been very little in the way of ethical debate on the use of chemotherapy in dogs. The purpose of this article is to undertake an ethical analysis to critically examine the use of chemotherapy to prolong the life of dogs suffering from cancer. If dogs have no concept of the future and are likely to suffer at least some adverse effects with such treatments, consideration should be given as to whether it is ethical and in the animal’s best interests to use chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic drugs are mutagenic, carcinogenic, teratogenic and may be irritant. Furthermore, chemotherapy may involve multiple trips to the veterinarian, multiple procedures and periods in isolation. Cancer-associated pain has been shown to be under-diagnosed and pet owners overestimate the effects of chemotherapy on treatment survival time. Of additional concern is the public health risks associated with chemotherapeutic drugs. As chemotherapy is not generally considered curative, it is in effect palliative care. However, palliative care may not be in the best interests of a terminally ill animal. As the specialty of veterinary oncology continues to grow and as the use of chemotherapy becomes more commonplace in the treatment of animals with cancer, it is imperative that there is an ongoing ethical debate on the use of chemotherapy in animals.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/7/441chemotherapycancerdogsoncologyethical theoriesethical analysis
spellingShingle Tanya Stephens
The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma
Animals
chemotherapy
cancer
dogs
oncology
ethical theories
ethical analysis
title The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma
title_full The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma
title_fullStr The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma
title_short The Use of Chemotherapy to Prolong the Life of Dogs Suffering from Cancer: The Ethical Dilemma
title_sort use of chemotherapy to prolong the life of dogs suffering from cancer the ethical dilemma
topic chemotherapy
cancer
dogs
oncology
ethical theories
ethical analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/7/441
work_keys_str_mv AT tanyastephens theuseofchemotherapytoprolongthelifeofdogssufferingfromcancertheethicaldilemma
AT tanyastephens useofchemotherapytoprolongthelifeofdogssufferingfromcancertheethicaldilemma