The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study

Abstract Background Numerous studies have investigated the potential association of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) with an increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLAs), but have produced conflicting results. Particularly studies comparing SGLT2-Is to glucagon-like peptide-1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikki C. C. Werkman, Johanna H. M. Driessen, Coen D. A. Stehouwer, Peter Vestergaard, Nicolaas C. Schaper, Joop P. van den Bergh, Johannes T. H. Nielen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:Cardiovascular Diabetology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01897-2
_version_ 1797789956165337088
author Nikki C. C. Werkman
Johanna H. M. Driessen
Coen D. A. Stehouwer
Peter Vestergaard
Nicolaas C. Schaper
Joop P. van den Bergh
Johannes T. H. Nielen
author_facet Nikki C. C. Werkman
Johanna H. M. Driessen
Coen D. A. Stehouwer
Peter Vestergaard
Nicolaas C. Schaper
Joop P. van den Bergh
Johannes T. H. Nielen
author_sort Nikki C. C. Werkman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Numerous studies have investigated the potential association of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) with an increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLAs), but have produced conflicting results. Particularly studies comparing SGLT2-Is to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) seem to find a higher LLA risk with SGLT2-I use. This raises the question whether the results are driven by a protective GLP1-RA-effect rather than a harmful SGLT2-I-effect. GLP1-RAs could promote wound healing and therefore reduce the risk of LLAs, but the associations between both drug classes and LLA remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the risk of LLA and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) with SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus sulfonylurea use. Methods A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish National Health Service (2013–2018). The study population (N = 74,475) consisted of type 2 diabetes patients aged 18 + who received a first ever prescription of an SGLT2-I, GLP1-RA or sulfonylurea. The date of the first prescription defined the start of follow-up. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) of LLA and DFU with current SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus current SU use. The models were adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic variables, comorbidities and concomitant drug use. Results Current SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA versus sulfonylureas {adjusted HR 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.70]}. Current GLP1-RA use, on the other hand, was associated with a lower risk of LLA [adjusted HR 0.57 (95%CI 0.39–0.84)] compared to sulfonylureas. The risk of DFU was similar to that with sulfonylureas with both exposures of interest. Conclusion SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA, but GLP1-RAs with a lower risk of LLA. Previous studies reporting a higher risk of LLA with SGLT2-I use compared to GLP1-RA use might have been looking at a protective GLP1-RA effect, rather than a harmful SGLT2-I effect.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:57:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3f95621d14c45b382e75bef4239e4b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-2840
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:57:38Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cardiovascular Diabetology
spelling doaj.art-a3f95621d14c45b382e75bef4239e4b72023-07-02T11:06:24ZengBMCCardiovascular Diabetology1475-28402023-06-0122111410.1186/s12933-023-01897-2The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort studyNikki C. C. Werkman0Johanna H. M. Driessen1Coen D. A. Stehouwer2Peter Vestergaard3Nicolaas C. Schaper4Joop P. van den Bergh5Johannes T. H. Nielen6Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht UniversityCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht UniversityCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg UniversityCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht UniversitySchool for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht UniversityDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+Abstract Background Numerous studies have investigated the potential association of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) with an increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLAs), but have produced conflicting results. Particularly studies comparing SGLT2-Is to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) seem to find a higher LLA risk with SGLT2-I use. This raises the question whether the results are driven by a protective GLP1-RA-effect rather than a harmful SGLT2-I-effect. GLP1-RAs could promote wound healing and therefore reduce the risk of LLAs, but the associations between both drug classes and LLA remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the risk of LLA and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) with SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus sulfonylurea use. Methods A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish National Health Service (2013–2018). The study population (N = 74,475) consisted of type 2 diabetes patients aged 18 + who received a first ever prescription of an SGLT2-I, GLP1-RA or sulfonylurea. The date of the first prescription defined the start of follow-up. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) of LLA and DFU with current SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus current SU use. The models were adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic variables, comorbidities and concomitant drug use. Results Current SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA versus sulfonylureas {adjusted HR 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.70]}. Current GLP1-RA use, on the other hand, was associated with a lower risk of LLA [adjusted HR 0.57 (95%CI 0.39–0.84)] compared to sulfonylureas. The risk of DFU was similar to that with sulfonylureas with both exposures of interest. Conclusion SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA, but GLP1-RAs with a lower risk of LLA. Previous studies reporting a higher risk of LLA with SGLT2-I use compared to GLP1-RA use might have been looking at a protective GLP1-RA effect, rather than a harmful SGLT2-I effect.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01897-2Type 2 diabetesSodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitorsGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistsAmputationsDiabetic foot ulcerCohort study
spellingShingle Nikki C. C. Werkman
Johanna H. M. Driessen
Coen D. A. Stehouwer
Peter Vestergaard
Nicolaas C. Schaper
Joop P. van den Bergh
Johannes T. H. Nielen
The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Type 2 diabetes
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
Amputations
Diabetic foot ulcer
Cohort study
title The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study
title_full The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study
title_fullStr The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study
title_short The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study
title_sort use of sodium glucose co transporter 2 inhibitors or glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations a nation wide cohort study
topic Type 2 diabetes
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
Amputations
Diabetic foot ulcer
Cohort study
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01897-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nikkiccwerkman theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT johannahmdriessen theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT coendastehouwer theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT petervestergaard theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT nicolaascschaper theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT jooppvandenbergh theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT johannesthnielen theuseofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT nikkiccwerkman useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT johannahmdriessen useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT coendastehouwer useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT petervestergaard useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT nicolaascschaper useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT jooppvandenbergh useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy
AT johannesthnielen useofsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsorglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsversussulfonylureasandtheriskoflowerlimbamputationsanationwidecohortstudy