Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.
Poor reporting quality may contribute to irreproducibility of results and failed 'bench-to-bedside' translation. Consequently, guidelines have been developed to improve the complete and transparent reporting of in vivo preclinical studies. To examine the impact of such guidelines on core m...
প্রধান লেখক: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
বিন্যাস: | প্রবন্ধ |
ভাষা: | English |
প্রকাশিত: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
মালা: | PLoS ONE |
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221 |