Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing
In interpreting spoken sentences in event contexts, comprehenders both integrate their current interpretation of language with the recent past (e.g., events they have witnessed) and develop expectations about future event possibilities. Tense cues can disambiguate this linking but temporary ambiguit...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701742/full |
_version_ | 1823968432858595328 |
---|---|
author | Dato Abashidze Pia Knoeferle Pia Knoeferle |
author_facet | Dato Abashidze Pia Knoeferle Pia Knoeferle |
author_sort | Dato Abashidze |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In interpreting spoken sentences in event contexts, comprehenders both integrate their current interpretation of language with the recent past (e.g., events they have witnessed) and develop expectations about future event possibilities. Tense cues can disambiguate this linking but temporary ambiguity in their interpretation may lead comprehenders to also rely on further, situation-specific cues (e.g., an actor's gaze as a cue to his future actions). How comprehenders reconcile these different cues in real time is an open issue that we must address to accommodate comprehension. It has been suggested that relating a referential expression (e.g., a verb) to a referent (e.g., a recent event) is preferred over relying on other cues that refer to the future and are not yet referentially grounded (“recent-event preference”). Two visual-world eye-tracking experiments compared this recent-event preference with effects of an actor's gaze and of tense/temporal adverbs as cues to a future action event. The results revealed that people overall preferred to focus on the recent (vs. future) event target in their interpretation, suggesting that while a congruent and incongruent actor gaze can jointly with futuric linguistic cues neutralize the recent-event preference late in the sentence, the latter still plays a key role in shaping participants' initial verb-based event interpretation. Additional post-experimental memory tests provided insight into the longevity of the gaze effects. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T18:41:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a42709c2a8744fd2b6babc1e8674ab8d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-1078 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T18:41:50Z |
publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Psychology |
spelling | doaj.art-a42709c2a8744fd2b6babc1e8674ab8d2022-12-21T21:36:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-10-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.701742701742Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language ProcessingDato Abashidze0Pia Knoeferle1Pia Knoeferle2Leibniz-Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), Berlin, GermanyDepartment of German Studies and Linguistics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Berlin, GermanyIn interpreting spoken sentences in event contexts, comprehenders both integrate their current interpretation of language with the recent past (e.g., events they have witnessed) and develop expectations about future event possibilities. Tense cues can disambiguate this linking but temporary ambiguity in their interpretation may lead comprehenders to also rely on further, situation-specific cues (e.g., an actor's gaze as a cue to his future actions). How comprehenders reconcile these different cues in real time is an open issue that we must address to accommodate comprehension. It has been suggested that relating a referential expression (e.g., a verb) to a referent (e.g., a recent event) is preferred over relying on other cues that refer to the future and are not yet referentially grounded (“recent-event preference”). Two visual-world eye-tracking experiments compared this recent-event preference with effects of an actor's gaze and of tense/temporal adverbs as cues to a future action event. The results revealed that people overall preferred to focus on the recent (vs. future) event target in their interpretation, suggesting that while a congruent and incongruent actor gaze can jointly with futuric linguistic cues neutralize the recent-event preference late in the sentence, the latter still plays a key role in shaping participants' initial verb-based event interpretation. Additional post-experimental memory tests provided insight into the longevity of the gaze effects.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701742/fulltense comprehensionrecent-event preferenceincongruent gaze cueeye-trackingshort-term linguistic and visual experiences |
spellingShingle | Dato Abashidze Pia Knoeferle Pia Knoeferle Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing Frontiers in Psychology tense comprehension recent-event preference incongruent gaze cue eye-tracking short-term linguistic and visual experiences |
title | Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing |
title_full | Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing |
title_fullStr | Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing |
title_short | Influence of Actor's Congruent and Incongruent Gaze on Language Processing |
title_sort | influence of actor s congruent and incongruent gaze on language processing |
topic | tense comprehension recent-event preference incongruent gaze cue eye-tracking short-term linguistic and visual experiences |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701742/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT datoabashidze influenceofactorscongruentandincongruentgazeonlanguageprocessing AT piaknoeferle influenceofactorscongruentandincongruentgazeonlanguageprocessing AT piaknoeferle influenceofactorscongruentandincongruentgazeonlanguageprocessing |