An Interview with Aaron Barlow, editor of Academe, the magazine of the American Association of University Professors

Aaron Barlow shares his views with Sean Scanlan on the problems of traditional peer review. Barlow is Faculty Editor of Academe, the magazine of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP). According to Barlow, his own views on business-as-usual peer review and academic publishing are b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean Scanlan, Aaron Barlow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: New York City College of Technology 2014-03-01
Series:NANO
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nanocrit.com/reviews/interview-barlow
Description
Summary:Aaron Barlow shares his views with Sean Scanlan on the problems of traditional peer review. Barlow is Faculty Editor of Academe, the magazine of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP). According to Barlow, his own views on business-as-usual peer review and academic publishing are becoming more radical the more he studies its issues. His key concepts are openness and change. Fear has the potential to hold back young scholars, but, according to Barlow, the winds have changed so much that people performing tenure review would have to strongly argue against a candidate who breaks new ground in open publishing. Barlow is hopeful about the future and encourages scholars to seek newer publishing formats
ISSN:2160-0104