Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood

Introduction: To review the incidence and risks of bladder cancer following gastrointestinal augmentations done for congenial anomalies in childhood. Materials and Methods: A literature search using PubMed and Ovid Medline search engines was performed. MeSH terms evaluated were; bladder augmentation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Douglas A. Husmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2009-04-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Urology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287209104163
_version_ 1818340314403831808
author Douglas A. Husmann
author_facet Douglas A. Husmann
author_sort Douglas A. Husmann
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: To review the incidence and risks of bladder cancer following gastrointestinal augmentations done for congenial anomalies in childhood. Materials and Methods: A literature search using PubMed and Ovid Medline search engines was performed. MeSH terms evaluated were; bladder augmentations, enterocystoplasty, gastrocystoplasty, spina bifida, spinal dysraphism, myelodysplasia, neural tube defects, posterior urethral valves and bladder exstrophy were cross referenced with the terms, bladder cancer and urinary bladder neoplasm. All patients who developed a bladder cancer following a bladder augmentation for a congenital anomaly were reviewed Results: A total of 20 cases of bladder cancer following augmentations for congential anomalies, were identified, 9 arose following ileal cystoplasty, 3 following colocystolasty and 8 following gastrocystoplasty. The incidence of cancer developing per decade following surgery was 1.5% for ileal/colonic and 2.8% for gastric bladder augmentations. The majority of cancers developing within the augmented bladder are at advanced stages at the time of diagnosis (60%; 12/20 cases were ≥T3 at diagnosis). Several of the cases that developed occurred in patients exposed to known carcinogenic stimuli and/or arose in bladders with a known predisposition to carcinoma. Conclusion: Patients augmented with ileal or colonic segment for a congenital bladder anomaly have a 7—8 fold and gastric augments a 14—15 fold increased risk for the development of bladder cancer over standard norms. Published data is however unable to determine if gastrointestinal bladder augmentation is an independent risk factor for cancer over the inherent risk of cancer arising from a congenitally abnormal bladder.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:40:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a42ef2d92ad44c8c83fff7d73c2ea827
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-2872
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:40:56Z
publishDate 2009-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Urology
spelling doaj.art-a42ef2d92ad44c8c83fff7d73c2ea8272022-12-21T23:39:50ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Urology1756-28722009-04-01110.1177/1756287209104163Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhoodDouglas A. HusmannIntroduction: To review the incidence and risks of bladder cancer following gastrointestinal augmentations done for congenial anomalies in childhood. Materials and Methods: A literature search using PubMed and Ovid Medline search engines was performed. MeSH terms evaluated were; bladder augmentations, enterocystoplasty, gastrocystoplasty, spina bifida, spinal dysraphism, myelodysplasia, neural tube defects, posterior urethral valves and bladder exstrophy were cross referenced with the terms, bladder cancer and urinary bladder neoplasm. All patients who developed a bladder cancer following a bladder augmentation for a congenital anomaly were reviewed Results: A total of 20 cases of bladder cancer following augmentations for congential anomalies, were identified, 9 arose following ileal cystoplasty, 3 following colocystolasty and 8 following gastrocystoplasty. The incidence of cancer developing per decade following surgery was 1.5% for ileal/colonic and 2.8% for gastric bladder augmentations. The majority of cancers developing within the augmented bladder are at advanced stages at the time of diagnosis (60%; 12/20 cases were ≥T3 at diagnosis). Several of the cases that developed occurred in patients exposed to known carcinogenic stimuli and/or arose in bladders with a known predisposition to carcinoma. Conclusion: Patients augmented with ileal or colonic segment for a congenital bladder anomaly have a 7—8 fold and gastric augments a 14—15 fold increased risk for the development of bladder cancer over standard norms. Published data is however unable to determine if gastrointestinal bladder augmentation is an independent risk factor for cancer over the inherent risk of cancer arising from a congenitally abnormal bladder.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287209104163
spellingShingle Douglas A. Husmann
Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
title Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
title_full Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
title_fullStr Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
title_full_unstemmed Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
title_short Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
title_sort malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287209104163
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasahusmann malignancyaftergastrointestinalaugmentationinchildhood