Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners

Abstract Introduction While multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare diagnosis within primary care, its precursor MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) is more common, particularly among older populations. Upon first detection, the majority of MGUS patients will be under the care of their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlene M. McShane, Blain Murphy, Olinda Santin, Lesley A. Anderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-019-0944-5
_version_ 1811228298546511872
author Charlene M. McShane
Blain Murphy
Olinda Santin
Lesley A. Anderson
author_facet Charlene M. McShane
Blain Murphy
Olinda Santin
Lesley A. Anderson
author_sort Charlene M. McShane
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction While multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare diagnosis within primary care, its precursor MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) is more common, particularly among older populations. Upon first detection, the majority of MGUS patients will be under the care of their General Practitioner (GP)/Family Doctor who is also often the first healthcare professional that patients report symptoms of progression to. However, our previous work with MGUS patients and haematology healthcare professionals has suggested that knowledge and awareness of MGUS is low among GPs. Methods An online survey was undertaken to investigate knowledge and awareness of MGUS and services needed by GPs/GP trainees to support these patients. The survey was promoted at a large European primary care conference and via social media. Descriptive statistics were utilised to compare participant responses. Results In total 58 GPs (n = 35 GPs and n = 23 GP trainees) from 24 countries responded. Overall, self-reported familiarity with the term MGUS was low (mean score: 2.21/5, standard deviation (SD): 1.09), but higher among GPs who reported having at least one MGUS patient (mean score: 2.83/5, SD 0.99). The majority (88.2%) of GPs/GP trainees stated they would feel uncomfortable discussing MGUS with patients. The increased risk of haematological malignancies was identified by 62.1% of GPs/GP trainees with MM, lymphoma and myelodysplastic syndromes the most commonly reported cancers associated with MGUS. The majority (81.6%) of GPs/GP trainees were supportive of patient follow-up via telephone clinics (phlebotomy performed in GP practice with patient management maintained by haematology) but only 27.1% stated they would be happy to solely manage all low/low-intermediate risk MGUS patients. A laboratory report alerting to the possibility of MGUS or a haematological malignancy was reported as the most useful service which could be implemented to help GPs manage MGUS patients. The need for MGUS focused information and education resources for GPs was also highlighted. Conclusions The findings of this study highlight a lack of knowledge and awareness of MGUS among GPs/ GP trainees. The majority of GPs/GP trainees are happy to support haematology in managing these patients but require assistance and support in providing these services.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:55:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a42f2505b1ca444bab797f6fcb76bf0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2296
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:55:43Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Family Practice
spelling doaj.art-a42f2505b1ca444bab797f6fcb76bf0c2022-12-22T03:37:43ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962019-05-012011810.1186/s12875-019-0944-5Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitionersCharlene M. McShane0Blain Murphy1Olinda Santin2Lesley A. Anderson3Cancer Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University BelfastCancer Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastCancer Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University BelfastAbstract Introduction While multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare diagnosis within primary care, its precursor MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) is more common, particularly among older populations. Upon first detection, the majority of MGUS patients will be under the care of their General Practitioner (GP)/Family Doctor who is also often the first healthcare professional that patients report symptoms of progression to. However, our previous work with MGUS patients and haematology healthcare professionals has suggested that knowledge and awareness of MGUS is low among GPs. Methods An online survey was undertaken to investigate knowledge and awareness of MGUS and services needed by GPs/GP trainees to support these patients. The survey was promoted at a large European primary care conference and via social media. Descriptive statistics were utilised to compare participant responses. Results In total 58 GPs (n = 35 GPs and n = 23 GP trainees) from 24 countries responded. Overall, self-reported familiarity with the term MGUS was low (mean score: 2.21/5, standard deviation (SD): 1.09), but higher among GPs who reported having at least one MGUS patient (mean score: 2.83/5, SD 0.99). The majority (88.2%) of GPs/GP trainees stated they would feel uncomfortable discussing MGUS with patients. The increased risk of haematological malignancies was identified by 62.1% of GPs/GP trainees with MM, lymphoma and myelodysplastic syndromes the most commonly reported cancers associated with MGUS. The majority (81.6%) of GPs/GP trainees were supportive of patient follow-up via telephone clinics (phlebotomy performed in GP practice with patient management maintained by haematology) but only 27.1% stated they would be happy to solely manage all low/low-intermediate risk MGUS patients. A laboratory report alerting to the possibility of MGUS or a haematological malignancy was reported as the most useful service which could be implemented to help GPs manage MGUS patients. The need for MGUS focused information and education resources for GPs was also highlighted. Conclusions The findings of this study highlight a lack of knowledge and awareness of MGUS among GPs/ GP trainees. The majority of GPs/GP trainees are happy to support haematology in managing these patients but require assistance and support in providing these services.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-019-0944-5MGUSHealthcare professionalsHaematologyMyelomaCommunication aidsFamily doctors/primary care
spellingShingle Charlene M. McShane
Blain Murphy
Olinda Santin
Lesley A. Anderson
Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners
BMC Family Practice
MGUS
Healthcare professionals
Haematology
Myeloma
Communication aids
Family doctors/primary care
title Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners
title_full Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners
title_fullStr Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners
title_short Low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among general practitioners
title_sort low knowledge and awareness of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance mgus among general practitioners
topic MGUS
Healthcare professionals
Haematology
Myeloma
Communication aids
Family doctors/primary care
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-019-0944-5
work_keys_str_mv AT charlenemmcshane lowknowledgeandawarenessofmonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancemgusamonggeneralpractitioners
AT blainmurphy lowknowledgeandawarenessofmonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancemgusamonggeneralpractitioners
AT olindasantin lowknowledgeandawarenessofmonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancemgusamonggeneralpractitioners
AT lesleyaanderson lowknowledgeandawarenessofmonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancemgusamonggeneralpractitioners