Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Aksaritmin (Aks) in comparison with Propafenone (Pr) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with none or minimal signs of structural heart disease. Methods and Results: The study included 60 patients aged 18-7...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Husniddin Sh. Kuchkarov, Nodir U. Zakirov, Ravshanbek D. Kurbanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Medical Research and Development Corporation 2023-06-01
Series:International Journal of Biomedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijbm.org/articles/i50/ijbm_13(2)_oa3.pdf
_version_ 1827929412814766080
author Husniddin Sh. Kuchkarov
Nodir U. Zakirov
Ravshanbek D. Kurbanov
author_facet Husniddin Sh. Kuchkarov
Nodir U. Zakirov
Ravshanbek D. Kurbanov
author_sort Husniddin Sh. Kuchkarov
collection DOAJ
description Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Aksaritmin (Aks) in comparison with Propafenone (Pr) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with none or minimal signs of structural heart disease. Methods and Results: The study included 60 patients aged 18-70 years (mean age of 58.1±7.7 years) with paroxysmal (frequency of more than 2 paroxysms/3 months episodes of AF) or persistent AF with no or minimal signs of structural heart disease. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 30 patients taking Aks, and Group 2 included 30 patients taking Pr. According to the study protocol, the starting dose of Aks was 75 mg/day, with a possible dose increasing to 112.5 mg/day. The starting dose of Pr was 45 0mg/day, with a possible dose increase to 600 mg/day. In Group 1, preventive efficacy of Aks was observed in 29(96.7%), 26(86.7%), and 24(80%) patients by 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Of these, 26(86.7%), 22(73.9%), and 16(53.3%) patients showed absolute preventive efficacy of the drug. In Group 2, preventive efficacy of Pr was observed in 28(93.3%), 26(86.7%), and 23(76,7%) patients at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Of these, 25(83.3%), 21(70%), and 14(46.7%) patients showed absolute AAE of the Pr. The initial recurrence rate of AF was 4.5±1.4 and 4.2±1.3 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.3933 between groups); but after 3 and 6 months of therapy, the recurrence rate decreased to 0.7±1.1 (P<0.0001) and 0.8±1.3 (P<0.0001), and 0.8±1.0 (P<0.0001) and 1.1±1.0 (P<0.0001), respectively, which was statistically significant in both groups. Conclusion: The preventive efficacy of Aks (including in combination with BB) at a dose of 75-112.5mg/day in recurrent forms of AF is comparable to the "reference" drug Pr at a dose of 450-600mg/day.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:21:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a431e19cef36403fbb01a98f734e70e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-0510
2158-0529
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:21:54Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher International Medical Research and Development Corporation
record_format Article
series International Journal of Biomedicine
spelling doaj.art-a431e19cef36403fbb01a98f734e70e32023-06-09T17:33:20ZengInternational Medical Research and Development CorporationInternational Journal of Biomedicine2158-05102158-05292023-06-0113222422810.21103/Article13(2)_OA3Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial FibrillationHusniddin Sh. Kuchkarov0Nodir U. Zakirov1Ravshanbek D. Kurbanov2Republican Specialized Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanRepublican Specialized Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanRepublican Specialized Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanBackground: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Aksaritmin (Aks) in comparison with Propafenone (Pr) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with none or minimal signs of structural heart disease. Methods and Results: The study included 60 patients aged 18-70 years (mean age of 58.1±7.7 years) with paroxysmal (frequency of more than 2 paroxysms/3 months episodes of AF) or persistent AF with no or minimal signs of structural heart disease. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 30 patients taking Aks, and Group 2 included 30 patients taking Pr. According to the study protocol, the starting dose of Aks was 75 mg/day, with a possible dose increasing to 112.5 mg/day. The starting dose of Pr was 45 0mg/day, with a possible dose increase to 600 mg/day. In Group 1, preventive efficacy of Aks was observed in 29(96.7%), 26(86.7%), and 24(80%) patients by 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Of these, 26(86.7%), 22(73.9%), and 16(53.3%) patients showed absolute preventive efficacy of the drug. In Group 2, preventive efficacy of Pr was observed in 28(93.3%), 26(86.7%), and 23(76,7%) patients at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Of these, 25(83.3%), 21(70%), and 14(46.7%) patients showed absolute AAE of the Pr. The initial recurrence rate of AF was 4.5±1.4 and 4.2±1.3 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.3933 between groups); but after 3 and 6 months of therapy, the recurrence rate decreased to 0.7±1.1 (P<0.0001) and 0.8±1.3 (P<0.0001), and 0.8±1.0 (P<0.0001) and 1.1±1.0 (P<0.0001), respectively, which was statistically significant in both groups. Conclusion: The preventive efficacy of Aks (including in combination with BB) at a dose of 75-112.5mg/day in recurrent forms of AF is comparable to the "reference" drug Pr at a dose of 450-600mg/day.http://www.ijbm.org/articles/i50/ijbm_13(2)_oa3.pdfatrial fibrillationantiarrhythmic efficacypropafenoneaksaritmin
spellingShingle Husniddin Sh. Kuchkarov
Nodir U. Zakirov
Ravshanbek D. Kurbanov
Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
International Journal of Biomedicine
atrial fibrillation
antiarrhythmic efficacy
propafenone
aksaritmin
title Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Aksaritmin and Propafenone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort comparative effectiveness of aksaritmin and propafenone in the prevention of atrial fibrillation
topic atrial fibrillation
antiarrhythmic efficacy
propafenone
aksaritmin
url http://www.ijbm.org/articles/i50/ijbm_13(2)_oa3.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT husniddinshkuchkarov comparativeeffectivenessofaksaritminandpropafenoneinthepreventionofatrialfibrillation
AT nodiruzakirov comparativeeffectivenessofaksaritminandpropafenoneinthepreventionofatrialfibrillation
AT ravshanbekdkurbanov comparativeeffectivenessofaksaritminandpropafenoneinthepreventionofatrialfibrillation