Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects

A key indicator of the System of National Accounts of Russia at a regional scale is Gross Regional Product characterizing the value of goods and services produced in all sectors of the economy in a country and intended for final consumption, capital formation and net exports (excluding imports). F...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boris Alengordovich Korobitsyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch 2015-09-01
Series:Экономика региона
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.economyofregion.com/archive/2015/56/2653/pdf/
_version_ 1797726459203158016
author Boris Alengordovich Korobitsyn
author_facet Boris Alengordovich Korobitsyn
author_sort Boris Alengordovich Korobitsyn
collection DOAJ
description A key indicator of the System of National Accounts of Russia at a regional scale is Gross Regional Product characterizing the value of goods and services produced in all sectors of the economy in a country and intended for final consumption, capital formation and net exports (excluding imports). From a sustainability perspective, the most weakness of GRP is that it ignores depreciation of man-made assets, natural resource depletion, environmental pollution and degradation, and potential social costs such as poorer health due to exposure to occupational hazards. Several types of alternative approaches to measuring socio-economic progress are considering for six administrative units of the Ural Federal District for the period 2006–2014. Proposed alternatives to GRP as a measure of social progress are focused on natural resource depletion, environmental externalities and some human development aspects. The most promising is the use of corrected macroeconomic indicators similar to the “genuine savings” compiled by the World Bank. Genuine savings are defined in this paper as net savings (net gross savings minus consumption of fixed capital) minus the consumption of natural non-renewable resources and the monetary evaluations of damages resulting from air pollution, water pollution and waste disposal. Two main groups of non renewable resources are considered: energy resources (uranium ore, oil and natural gas) and mineral resources (iron ore, copper, and aluminum). In spite of various shortcomings, this indicator represents a considerable improvement over GRP information. For example, while GRP demonstrates steady growth between 2006 and 2014 for the main Russian oil- and gas-producing regions — Hanty-Mansi and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrugs, genuine savings for these regions decreased over all period. It means that their resource-based economy could not be considered as being on a sustainable path even in the framework of “weak” sustainability, i.e. sustainability under the assumption that the accumulation of producible physical capital and of human capital can compensate for losses in natural non reproducible resources
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:45:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a435fabff6a84468a1e8400d46a99317
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6414
2411-1406
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:45:49Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch
record_format Article
series Экономика региона
spelling doaj.art-a435fabff6a84468a1e8400d46a993172023-09-02T07:36:32ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics of the Ural BranchЭкономика региона2072-64142411-14062015-09-0120153778810.17059/2015-3-7Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital AspectsBoris Alengordovich Korobitsyn0Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RASA key indicator of the System of National Accounts of Russia at a regional scale is Gross Regional Product characterizing the value of goods and services produced in all sectors of the economy in a country and intended for final consumption, capital formation and net exports (excluding imports). From a sustainability perspective, the most weakness of GRP is that it ignores depreciation of man-made assets, natural resource depletion, environmental pollution and degradation, and potential social costs such as poorer health due to exposure to occupational hazards. Several types of alternative approaches to measuring socio-economic progress are considering for six administrative units of the Ural Federal District for the period 2006–2014. Proposed alternatives to GRP as a measure of social progress are focused on natural resource depletion, environmental externalities and some human development aspects. The most promising is the use of corrected macroeconomic indicators similar to the “genuine savings” compiled by the World Bank. Genuine savings are defined in this paper as net savings (net gross savings minus consumption of fixed capital) minus the consumption of natural non-renewable resources and the monetary evaluations of damages resulting from air pollution, water pollution and waste disposal. Two main groups of non renewable resources are considered: energy resources (uranium ore, oil and natural gas) and mineral resources (iron ore, copper, and aluminum). In spite of various shortcomings, this indicator represents a considerable improvement over GRP information. For example, while GRP demonstrates steady growth between 2006 and 2014 for the main Russian oil- and gas-producing regions — Hanty-Mansi and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrugs, genuine savings for these regions decreased over all period. It means that their resource-based economy could not be considered as being on a sustainable path even in the framework of “weak” sustainability, i.e. sustainability under the assumption that the accumulation of producible physical capital and of human capital can compensate for losses in natural non reproducible resourceshttp://www.economyofregion.com/archive/2015/56/2653/pdf/Ural Federal Districtgreen gross regional productgenuine savingsadjusted net savingsdepletion of natural resources
spellingShingle Boris Alengordovich Korobitsyn
Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects
Экономика региона
Ural Federal District
green gross regional product
genuine savings
adjusted net savings
depletion of natural resources
title Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects
title_full Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects
title_fullStr Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects
title_short Methodological Approaches for Estimating Gross Regional Product after Taking into Account Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution and Human Capital Aspects
title_sort methodological approaches for estimating gross regional product after taking into account depletion of natural resources environmental pollution and human capital aspects
topic Ural Federal District
green gross regional product
genuine savings
adjusted net savings
depletion of natural resources
url http://www.economyofregion.com/archive/2015/56/2653/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT borisalengordovichkorobitsyn methodologicalapproachesforestimatinggrossregionalproductaftertakingintoaccountdepletionofnaturalresourcesenvironmentalpollutionandhumancapitalaspects