Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Abstract Complacency is almost archaic in the knowledge economy, because firms are overwhelmingly confronted with diverse expectations from better informed stakeholders, who pressure on societal issues amid shareholders’ calls for greater financial security. Similarly, there is a growing call for co...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Main Authors: Hart O. Awa, Willie Etim, Enyinda Ogbonda
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:English
Publicado em: SpringerOpen 2024-06-01
Colecção:International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y
_version_ 1827213880255840256
author Hart O. Awa
Willie Etim
Enyinda Ogbonda
author_facet Hart O. Awa
Willie Etim
Enyinda Ogbonda
author_sort Hart O. Awa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Complacency is almost archaic in the knowledge economy, because firms are overwhelmingly confronted with diverse expectations from better informed stakeholders, who pressure on societal issues amid shareholders’ calls for greater financial security. Similarly, there is a growing call for corporations to redefine their responsibilities to stakeholders, and to integrate socio-economic and environmental concerns into business processes and strategies in order to transparently impact on societies. In a bid to support mutually beneficial relationships, this paper shows how stakeholder theory proactively moderates the strength of CSR in social interactions, environmental protection, and sustainable development. It proposes a four-stage stakeholder dialogue ladder which attempts to synergize CSR, stakeholder and stakeholder theory based on the stages as defined by the firm’s extent of development, and her regularity and intensity of interaction with stakeholders. The paper argues that subject to the problem to solve, the languages of CSR and stakeholder theory are useful and that, the dichotomies of covering wrongdoing and creating falsehoods could be addressed when firms adopt stakeholder dialogue and collaboration that aid friendly CSR programmes. Thus, the relationship turns that of dyadic partnership, because corporations follow issue or purpose-based CSR programmes that create values that trickle to interdependent stakeholders. In sum, corporations need to continually get committed to environmentally-sensitive CSR since there is a strong relationship between CSR activities, stakeholders and actual performance.
first_indexed 2025-03-21T14:22:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a43a27f2ee9b4b9eb26cedc784e5c81e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-0066
2366-0074
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-21T14:22:28Z
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility
spelling doaj.art-a43a27f2ee9b4b9eb26cedc784e5c81e2024-06-23T22:27:58ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility2366-00662366-00742024-06-019111410.1186/s40991-024-00094-yStakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)Hart O. Awa0Willie Etim1Enyinda Ogbonda2Department of Marketing, University of Port HarcourtMedia & Publicity, Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC)Rivers State UniversityAbstract Complacency is almost archaic in the knowledge economy, because firms are overwhelmingly confronted with diverse expectations from better informed stakeholders, who pressure on societal issues amid shareholders’ calls for greater financial security. Similarly, there is a growing call for corporations to redefine their responsibilities to stakeholders, and to integrate socio-economic and environmental concerns into business processes and strategies in order to transparently impact on societies. In a bid to support mutually beneficial relationships, this paper shows how stakeholder theory proactively moderates the strength of CSR in social interactions, environmental protection, and sustainable development. It proposes a four-stage stakeholder dialogue ladder which attempts to synergize CSR, stakeholder and stakeholder theory based on the stages as defined by the firm’s extent of development, and her regularity and intensity of interaction with stakeholders. The paper argues that subject to the problem to solve, the languages of CSR and stakeholder theory are useful and that, the dichotomies of covering wrongdoing and creating falsehoods could be addressed when firms adopt stakeholder dialogue and collaboration that aid friendly CSR programmes. Thus, the relationship turns that of dyadic partnership, because corporations follow issue or purpose-based CSR programmes that create values that trickle to interdependent stakeholders. In sum, corporations need to continually get committed to environmentally-sensitive CSR since there is a strong relationship between CSR activities, stakeholders and actual performance.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-yStakeholdersCSRStakeholder theory
spellingShingle Hart O. Awa
Willie Etim
Enyinda Ogbonda
Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility
Stakeholders
CSR
Stakeholder theory
title Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
title_full Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
title_fullStr Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
title_short Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
title_sort stakeholders stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility csr
topic Stakeholders
CSR
Stakeholder theory
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hartoawa stakeholdersstakeholdertheoryandcorporatesocialresponsibilitycsr
AT willieetim stakeholdersstakeholdertheoryandcorporatesocialresponsibilitycsr
AT enyindaogbonda stakeholdersstakeholdertheoryandcorporatesocialresponsibilitycsr