Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement

Background: The Mayo-Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) classification for proximal humerus fractures aims to identify specific fracture patterns and apply displacement criteria to each pattern. The classification includes 7 common fracture patterns: isolated fractures of the greater or lesser tuberosity,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio M. Foruria, MD, PhD, Natalia Martinez-Catalan, MD, Belen Pardos, MD, Dirk Larson, MS, Jonathan Barlow, MD, MS, Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-07-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322000925
_version_ 1811238467293675520
author Antonio M. Foruria, MD, PhD
Natalia Martinez-Catalan, MD
Belen Pardos, MD
Dirk Larson, MS
Jonathan Barlow, MD, MS
Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD
author_facet Antonio M. Foruria, MD, PhD
Natalia Martinez-Catalan, MD
Belen Pardos, MD
Dirk Larson, MS
Jonathan Barlow, MD, MS
Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD
author_sort Antonio M. Foruria, MD, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Background: The Mayo-Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) classification for proximal humerus fractures aims to identify specific fracture patterns and apply displacement criteria to each pattern. The classification includes 7 common fracture patterns: isolated fractures of the greater or lesser tuberosity, fractures of the surgical neck, impacted fractures involving head rotation in a varus and posteromedial direction or in valgus, and fractures where the humeral head is dislocated (head dislocation), split (head splitting), or depressed (head impaction). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo-FJD classification system using plain radiographs (xR) and computed tomography (CT). Methods: Three fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the xR and CT of 103 consecutive proximal humerus fractures treated at a Level I trauma center. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo-FJD classification system on 4 separate sessions at least 6 weeks apart. K values were calculated for intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Results: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.9 (almost perfect) for xR and 0.9 (almost perfect) for CT scans. The average interobserver agreement was 0.69 (substantial) for xR and 0.81 (almost perfect) for CT scans at the first round, and 0.66 (substantial) for xR and 0.75 (substantial) for CT scans at the second round. Conclusion: The pattern-based Mayo-FJD classification scheme for proximal humerus fractures was associated with adequate intraobserver and interobserver agreement using both xR and CT scan. Interobserver agreement was best when fractures were classified using CT scans.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:41:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a440cc03dc994dfd8d53fac89ca89c3f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6383
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:41:54Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj.art-a440cc03dc994dfd8d53fac89ca89c3f2022-12-22T03:32:45ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832022-07-0164563568Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreementAntonio M. Foruria, MD, PhD0Natalia Martinez-Catalan, MD1Belen Pardos, MD2Dirk Larson, MS3Jonathan Barlow, MD, MS4Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD5Upper Extremity Reconstruction Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department. Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, SpainUpper Extremity Reconstruction Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department. Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, SpainUpper Extremity Reconstruction Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department. Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAUpper Extremity Reconstruction division. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAUpper Extremity Reconstruction division. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Corresponding author: Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD, Gonda 14, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.Background: The Mayo-Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) classification for proximal humerus fractures aims to identify specific fracture patterns and apply displacement criteria to each pattern. The classification includes 7 common fracture patterns: isolated fractures of the greater or lesser tuberosity, fractures of the surgical neck, impacted fractures involving head rotation in a varus and posteromedial direction or in valgus, and fractures where the humeral head is dislocated (head dislocation), split (head splitting), or depressed (head impaction). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo-FJD classification system using plain radiographs (xR) and computed tomography (CT). Methods: Three fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the xR and CT of 103 consecutive proximal humerus fractures treated at a Level I trauma center. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo-FJD classification system on 4 separate sessions at least 6 weeks apart. K values were calculated for intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Results: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.9 (almost perfect) for xR and 0.9 (almost perfect) for CT scans. The average interobserver agreement was 0.69 (substantial) for xR and 0.81 (almost perfect) for CT scans at the first round, and 0.66 (substantial) for xR and 0.75 (substantial) for CT scans at the second round. Conclusion: The pattern-based Mayo-FJD classification scheme for proximal humerus fractures was associated with adequate intraobserver and interobserver agreement using both xR and CT scan. Interobserver agreement was best when fractures were classified using CT scans.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322000925Mayo-FJD classificationProximal humerus fractureInterobserver agreementComputed tomography (CT)RadiographyFracture pattern
spellingShingle Antonio M. Foruria, MD, PhD
Natalia Martinez-Catalan, MD
Belen Pardos, MD
Dirk Larson, MS
Jonathan Barlow, MD, MS
Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD
Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
JSES International
Mayo-FJD classification
Proximal humerus fracture
Interobserver agreement
Computed tomography (CT)
Radiography
Fracture pattern
title Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
title_full Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
title_fullStr Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
title_full_unstemmed Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
title_short Classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
title_sort classification of proximal humerus fractures according to pattern recognition is associated with high intraobserver and interobserver agreement
topic Mayo-FJD classification
Proximal humerus fracture
Interobserver agreement
Computed tomography (CT)
Radiography
Fracture pattern
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322000925
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniomforuriamdphd classificationofproximalhumerusfracturesaccordingtopatternrecognitionisassociatedwithhighintraobserverandinterobserveragreement
AT nataliamartinezcatalanmd classificationofproximalhumerusfracturesaccordingtopatternrecognitionisassociatedwithhighintraobserverandinterobserveragreement
AT belenpardosmd classificationofproximalhumerusfracturesaccordingtopatternrecognitionisassociatedwithhighintraobserverandinterobserveragreement
AT dirklarsonms classificationofproximalhumerusfracturesaccordingtopatternrecognitionisassociatedwithhighintraobserverandinterobserveragreement
AT jonathanbarlowmdms classificationofproximalhumerusfracturesaccordingtopatternrecognitionisassociatedwithhighintraobserverandinterobserveragreement
AT joaquinsanchezsotelomdphd classificationofproximalhumerusfracturesaccordingtopatternrecognitionisassociatedwithhighintraobserverandinterobserveragreement