Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting

Raja Mudad,1 Manish B Patel,2 Sandra Margunato-Debay,2 David Garofalo,3 Lincy S Lal4 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hollywood, FL, USA; 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA; 3Cardinal Health, Dallas, TX, USA; 4University of Texas School of Pub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mudad R, Patel MB, Margunato-Debay S, Garofalo D, Lal LS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-10-01
Series:Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/comparative-effectiveness-and-safety-of-nab-paclitaxel-plus-carboplati-peer-reviewed-article-LCTT
_version_ 1818402757678202880
author Mudad R
Patel MB
Margunato-Debay S
Garofalo D
Lal LS
author_facet Mudad R
Patel MB
Margunato-Debay S
Garofalo D
Lal LS
author_sort Mudad R
collection DOAJ
description Raja Mudad,1 Manish B Patel,2 Sandra Margunato-Debay,2 David Garofalo,3 Lincy S Lal4 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hollywood, FL, USA; 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA; 3Cardinal Health, Dallas, TX, USA; 4University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA Introduction: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methods: Patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus platinum were identified from the Navigating Cancer database. Clinical effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Other endpoints included safety and utilization of supportive care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics.Results: In total, 193 patients were included (nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin, n = 61; gemcitabine plus platinum, n = 132). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the cohorts. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin had a significantly longer OS than those receiving gemcitabine plus carboplatin (median, 12.8 vs 9.0 months; P = 0.03). However, the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99–2.42; P = 0.06). nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-treated patients had significantly longer TTD than gemcitabine plus carboplatin-treated patients (median, 4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = 0.03; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.90; P = 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 anemia and neutropenia were significantly lower in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Nausea and neuropathy (grade not specified) were significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin than the gemcitabine plus carboplatin group. No differences in supportive care use were observed between the cohorts.Conclusion: These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell NSCLC. Keywords: chemotherapy, doublet treatment options, electronic medical records, NSCLC, real-world evidence, retrospective analysis
first_indexed 2024-12-14T08:13:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-2728
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T08:13:26Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
spelling doaj.art-a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f2022-12-21T23:10:01ZengDove Medical PressLung Cancer: Targets and Therapy1179-27282017-10-01Volume 817919035264Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology settingMudad RPatel MBMargunato-Debay SGarofalo DLal LSRaja Mudad,1 Manish B Patel,2 Sandra Margunato-Debay,2 David Garofalo,3 Lincy S Lal4 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hollywood, FL, USA; 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA; 3Cardinal Health, Dallas, TX, USA; 4University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA Introduction: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methods: Patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus platinum were identified from the Navigating Cancer database. Clinical effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Other endpoints included safety and utilization of supportive care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics.Results: In total, 193 patients were included (nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin, n = 61; gemcitabine plus platinum, n = 132). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the cohorts. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin had a significantly longer OS than those receiving gemcitabine plus carboplatin (median, 12.8 vs 9.0 months; P = 0.03). However, the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99–2.42; P = 0.06). nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-treated patients had significantly longer TTD than gemcitabine plus carboplatin-treated patients (median, 4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = 0.03; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.90; P = 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 anemia and neutropenia were significantly lower in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Nausea and neuropathy (grade not specified) were significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin than the gemcitabine plus carboplatin group. No differences in supportive care use were observed between the cohorts.Conclusion: These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell NSCLC. Keywords: chemotherapy, doublet treatment options, electronic medical records, NSCLC, real-world evidence, retrospective analysishttps://www.dovepress.com/comparative-effectiveness-and-safety-of-nab-paclitaxel-plus-carboplati-peer-reviewed-article-LCTTChemotherapydoublet treatment optionselectronic medical recordsNSCLCreal-world evidenceretrospective analysis
spellingShingle Mudad R
Patel MB
Margunato-Debay S
Garofalo D
Lal LS
Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
Chemotherapy
doublet treatment options
electronic medical records
NSCLC
real-world evidence
retrospective analysis
title Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_full Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_short Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_sort comparative effectiveness and safety of nab paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first line treatment of advanced squamous cell non small cell lung cancer in a us community oncology setting
topic Chemotherapy
doublet treatment options
electronic medical records
NSCLC
real-world evidence
retrospective analysis
url https://www.dovepress.com/comparative-effectiveness-and-safety-of-nab-paclitaxel-plus-carboplati-peer-reviewed-article-LCTT
work_keys_str_mv AT mudadr comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT patelmb comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT margunatodebays comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT garofalod comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT lalls comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting