Favor theory – theory of social capital

<p>The purpose of this article is to formulate a theory of social capital, which has the potential to reconcile many of the contradictions and problems that exist today in this field of knowledge. The proposed conceptualization has the potential to resolve the following problems: 1) The imposs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Denis Mond
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2022-09-01
Series:Наука. Культура. Общество
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journal-scs.ru/index.php/scs/article/view/404/385
_version_ 1797904719622963200
author Denis Mond
author_facet Denis Mond
author_sort Denis Mond
collection DOAJ
description <p>The purpose of this article is to formulate a theory of social capital, which has the potential to reconcile many of the contradictions and problems that exist today in this field of knowledge. The proposed conceptualization has the potential to resolve the following problems: 1) The impossibility of reducing the rational and irrational aspects of social capital to one denominator; 2) Lack of connection between micro and macro analysis; 3) tautology of definition, when social capital is defined by its effects; 4) the inability to reduce the manifestations of social capital to a single basis; 5) biased positivity; and others. First, the author proposes to define social capital through the concept of willingness to do a favor (favor willingness), which is meant to be the basis of social capital (social resource). Next the topic of the sources of this willingness is explored, which, according to the author, are liking for and trust in a social unit (person, group, company, etc.). Next, the concept of social capital infrastructure is introduced, the role of which is to allow for the accumulation of social capital and its transfer between network members. The infrastructure consists of two levels – the social network as a whole and interpersonal relations in particular. At the first level, general liking and trust are accumulated, at the second – personal liking and trust. Next the issue of extracting benefits from social capital (activation, use) is highlighted. After that, examples of the compatibility of this theory with already existing concepts are given. The author concludes that the proposed concept well resolves some key contradictions and problems in the science of social capital.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:53:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a458d9d175a24862af69f1a8ac9b6e97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2713-0681
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:53:25Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
record_format Article
series Наука. Культура. Общество
spelling doaj.art-a458d9d175a24862af69f1a8ac9b6e972023-02-16T16:25:52ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyНаука. Культура. Общество2713-06812022-09-01283688010.19181/nko.2022.28.3.5404Favor theory – theory of social capitalDenis Mond0Russia<p>The purpose of this article is to formulate a theory of social capital, which has the potential to reconcile many of the contradictions and problems that exist today in this field of knowledge. The proposed conceptualization has the potential to resolve the following problems: 1) The impossibility of reducing the rational and irrational aspects of social capital to one denominator; 2) Lack of connection between micro and macro analysis; 3) tautology of definition, when social capital is defined by its effects; 4) the inability to reduce the manifestations of social capital to a single basis; 5) biased positivity; and others. First, the author proposes to define social capital through the concept of willingness to do a favor (favor willingness), which is meant to be the basis of social capital (social resource). Next the topic of the sources of this willingness is explored, which, according to the author, are liking for and trust in a social unit (person, group, company, etc.). Next, the concept of social capital infrastructure is introduced, the role of which is to allow for the accumulation of social capital and its transfer between network members. The infrastructure consists of two levels – the social network as a whole and interpersonal relations in particular. At the first level, general liking and trust are accumulated, at the second – personal liking and trust. Next the issue of extracting benefits from social capital (activation, use) is highlighted. After that, examples of the compatibility of this theory with already existing concepts are given. The author concludes that the proposed concept well resolves some key contradictions and problems in the science of social capital.</p>https://www.journal-scs.ru/index.php/scs/article/view/404/385social capitaltheoryconceptproblemssourcesdefinitionactivationtrustlikingfavor willingness
spellingShingle Denis Mond
Favor theory – theory of social capital
Наука. Культура. Общество
social capital
theory
concept
problems
sources
definition
activation
trust
liking
favor willingness
title Favor theory – theory of social capital
title_full Favor theory – theory of social capital
title_fullStr Favor theory – theory of social capital
title_full_unstemmed Favor theory – theory of social capital
title_short Favor theory – theory of social capital
title_sort favor theory вђ theory of social capital
topic social capital
theory
concept
problems
sources
definition
activation
trust
liking
favor willingness
url https://www.journal-scs.ru/index.php/scs/article/view/404/385
work_keys_str_mv AT denismond favortheoryvđtheoryofsocialcapital