Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe
We offer readers one of the very first books to appear on Nietzsche, and certainly the first to attempt to show that Nietzsche is a genuine “philosopher”. Why was Nietzsche not considered a philosopher by many of his contemporaries? And in what sense can he nonetheless be declared a philosopher? The...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Éditions Kimé
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Philosophia Scientiæ |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/4217 |
| _version_ | 1797223199409176576 |
|---|---|
| author | Christophe Bouriau |
| author_facet | Christophe Bouriau |
| author_sort | Christophe Bouriau |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We offer readers one of the very first books to appear on Nietzsche, and certainly the first to attempt to show that Nietzsche is a genuine “philosopher”. Why was Nietzsche not considered a philosopher by many of his contemporaries? And in what sense can he nonetheless be declared a philosopher? These are the questions addressed in this essay by Hans Vaihinger, one of the very few Neo-Kantians to take an interest in Nietzsche’s work. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:33:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a45a4de2306547b088f5362c57028f0b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1281-2463 1775-4283 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:33:26Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Éditions Kimé |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Philosophia Scientiæ |
| spelling | doaj.art-a45a4de2306547b088f5362c57028f0b2024-04-04T09:26:24ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832024-04-01281394410.4000/philosophiascientiae.4217Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosopheChristophe BouriauWe offer readers one of the very first books to appear on Nietzsche, and certainly the first to attempt to show that Nietzsche is a genuine “philosopher”. Why was Nietzsche not considered a philosopher by many of his contemporaries? And in what sense can he nonetheless be declared a philosopher? These are the questions addressed in this essay by Hans Vaihinger, one of the very few Neo-Kantians to take an interest in Nietzsche’s work.https://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/4217 |
| spellingShingle | Christophe Bouriau Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe Philosophia Scientiæ |
| title | Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe |
| title_full | Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe |
| title_fullStr | Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe |
| title_full_unstemmed | Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe |
| title_short | Avant-propos à la traduction de Nietzsche philosophe |
| title_sort | avant propos a la traduction de nietzsche philosophe |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/4217 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christophebouriau avantproposalatraductiondenietzschephilosophe |