Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>GPs follow clinical guidelines to varying degrees across practices, regions and countries, but a review study of GPs' attitudes to guidelines found no systematic variation in attitudes between studies from different countries. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kjellberg Pia K, Carlsen Benedicte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/17
_version_ 1818212303831564288
author Kjellberg Pia K
Carlsen Benedicte
author_facet Kjellberg Pia K
Carlsen Benedicte
author_sort Kjellberg Pia K
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>GPs follow clinical guidelines to varying degrees across practices, regions and countries, but a review study of GPs' attitudes to guidelines found no systematic variation in attitudes between studies from different countries. However, earlier qualitative studies on this topic are not necessarily comparable. Hence, there is a lack of empirical comparative studies of GP's attitudes to following clinical guidelines. In this study we reproduce a Norwegian focus group study of GPs' general attitudes to national clinical guidelines in Denmark and conduct a comparative analysis of the findings.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A strategic sample of GP's in Norway (27 GPs) and Denmark (18 GPs) was interviewed about their attitudes to guidelines, and the interviews coded and compared for common themes and differences.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Similarities dominated the comparative material, but the analysis also revealed notable differences in attitudes between Norwegian and the Danish GPs. The most important difference was related to GP's attitudes to clinical guidelines that incorporated economic evaluations. While the Norwegian GPs were sceptical to guidelines that incorporated economic evaluation, the Danish GPs regarded these guidelines as important and legitimate. We suggest that the differences could be explained by the history of guideline development in Norway and Denmark respectively. Whereas government guidelines for rationing services were only newly introduced in Norway, they have been used in Denmark for many years.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Comparative qualitative studies of GPs attitudes to clinical guidelines may reveal cross-national differences relating to the varying histories of guideline development. Further studies are needed to explore this hypothesis.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:46:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a45a751889844b91803dae0519fb8fea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:46:15Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-a45a751889844b91803dae0519fb8fea2022-12-22T00:35:47ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-01-011011710.1186/1472-6963-10-17Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and DenmarkKjellberg Pia KCarlsen Benedicte<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>GPs follow clinical guidelines to varying degrees across practices, regions and countries, but a review study of GPs' attitudes to guidelines found no systematic variation in attitudes between studies from different countries. However, earlier qualitative studies on this topic are not necessarily comparable. Hence, there is a lack of empirical comparative studies of GP's attitudes to following clinical guidelines. In this study we reproduce a Norwegian focus group study of GPs' general attitudes to national clinical guidelines in Denmark and conduct a comparative analysis of the findings.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A strategic sample of GP's in Norway (27 GPs) and Denmark (18 GPs) was interviewed about their attitudes to guidelines, and the interviews coded and compared for common themes and differences.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Similarities dominated the comparative material, but the analysis also revealed notable differences in attitudes between Norwegian and the Danish GPs. The most important difference was related to GP's attitudes to clinical guidelines that incorporated economic evaluations. While the Norwegian GPs were sceptical to guidelines that incorporated economic evaluation, the Danish GPs regarded these guidelines as important and legitimate. We suggest that the differences could be explained by the history of guideline development in Norway and Denmark respectively. Whereas government guidelines for rationing services were only newly introduced in Norway, they have been used in Denmark for many years.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Comparative qualitative studies of GPs attitudes to clinical guidelines may reveal cross-national differences relating to the varying histories of guideline development. Further studies are needed to explore this hypothesis.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/17
spellingShingle Kjellberg Pia K
Carlsen Benedicte
Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark
BMC Health Services Research
title Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark
title_full Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark
title_fullStr Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark
title_short Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark
title_sort guidelines from foe to friend comparative interviews with gps in norway and denmark
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/17
work_keys_str_mv AT kjellbergpiak guidelinesfromfoetofriendcomparativeinterviewswithgpsinnorwayanddenmark
AT carlsenbenedicte guidelinesfromfoetofriendcomparativeinterviewswithgpsinnorwayanddenmark