Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach

Firms need resilience to help them get rid of failures or crises when facing emergency, yet—surprisingly—the issue of how to activate and develop organizational resilience has not been effectively addressed. Underpinned by configuration thinking, this study uses the fsQCA method to reveal the coordi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qing Li, Xiu-e Zhang, Wenxin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-02-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158057
_version_ 1811162948331110400
author Qing Li
Xiu-e Zhang
Wenxin Zhang
author_facet Qing Li
Xiu-e Zhang
Wenxin Zhang
author_sort Qing Li
collection DOAJ
description Firms need resilience to help them get rid of failures or crises when facing emergency, yet—surprisingly—the issue of how to activate and develop organizational resilience has not been effectively addressed. Underpinned by configuration thinking, this study uses the fsQCA method to reveal the coordination and causal complexity between the six conditions that promote or inhibit the formation of organizational resilience. Specifically, the cognitive level includes manager self-efficacy and mindful organizing; the behavioral level includes exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation; the contextual reinforcement level includes bonding social capital and bridging social capital. Using survey data from 155 firms in China, the study found that: (1) Single antecedent condition is difficult to form high organizational resilience, but the lack of bonding social capital is a necessary condition for generating non-high organizational resilience. (2) Among the different configurations of six conditions, there are four pathways to form high organizational resilience, which can be specifically classified into three modes: Exploration, Ambidextrous, and Defensive configuration. (3) Three formation pathways for non-high organizational resilience, and there is an asymmetric causal relationship with high organizational resilience. The findings enrich the theory of crisis management and organizational resilience and provide a valuable reference for enterprises to effectively stimulate organizational resilience to respond to emergencies.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:37:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a45ba07bc6bf418f94f858646645a5ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-2440
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:37:37Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series SAGE Open
spelling doaj.art-a45ba07bc6bf418f94f858646645a5ea2023-02-28T16:34:15ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402023-02-011310.1177/21582440231158057Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA ApproachQing Li0Xiu-e Zhang1Wenxin Zhang2School of Management, Changchun University, Changchun, ChinaSchool of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun, ChinaSchool of Economics, Management and Law, Jilin Normal University, Siping, ChinaFirms need resilience to help them get rid of failures or crises when facing emergency, yet—surprisingly—the issue of how to activate and develop organizational resilience has not been effectively addressed. Underpinned by configuration thinking, this study uses the fsQCA method to reveal the coordination and causal complexity between the six conditions that promote or inhibit the formation of organizational resilience. Specifically, the cognitive level includes manager self-efficacy and mindful organizing; the behavioral level includes exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation; the contextual reinforcement level includes bonding social capital and bridging social capital. Using survey data from 155 firms in China, the study found that: (1) Single antecedent condition is difficult to form high organizational resilience, but the lack of bonding social capital is a necessary condition for generating non-high organizational resilience. (2) Among the different configurations of six conditions, there are four pathways to form high organizational resilience, which can be specifically classified into three modes: Exploration, Ambidextrous, and Defensive configuration. (3) Three formation pathways for non-high organizational resilience, and there is an asymmetric causal relationship with high organizational resilience. The findings enrich the theory of crisis management and organizational resilience and provide a valuable reference for enterprises to effectively stimulate organizational resilience to respond to emergencies.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158057
spellingShingle Qing Li
Xiu-e Zhang
Wenxin Zhang
Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach
SAGE Open
title Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach
title_full Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach
title_fullStr Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach
title_full_unstemmed Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach
title_short Organizational Resilience and Configurational Conditions From the Perspective of Emergency: A fsQCA Approach
title_sort organizational resilience and configurational conditions from the perspective of emergency a fsqca approach
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158057
work_keys_str_mv AT qingli organizationalresilienceandconfigurationalconditionsfromtheperspectiveofemergencyafsqcaapproach
AT xiuezhang organizationalresilienceandconfigurationalconditionsfromtheperspectiveofemergencyafsqcaapproach
AT wenxinzhang organizationalresilienceandconfigurationalconditionsfromtheperspectiveofemergencyafsqcaapproach