Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests
Comment la problématique du bois mort est-elle devenue une des composantes importantes des politiques de gestion de la biodiversité en forêt ? Les auteurs nous apportent quelques éléments de réponse sur l'émergence et la prise en compte de cette question dans les politiques de gestion.<br>...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE)
2010-10-01
|
| Series: | Sciences, Eaux & Territoires |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/24_article.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819071701834530816 |
|---|---|
| author | Philippe Deuffic et Christophe Bouget |
| author_facet | Philippe Deuffic et Christophe Bouget |
| author_sort | Philippe Deuffic et Christophe Bouget |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Comment la problématique du bois mort est-elle devenue une des composantes importantes des politiques de gestion de la biodiversité en forêt ? Les auteurs nous apportent quelques éléments de réponse sur l'émergence et la prise en compte de cette question dans les politiques de gestion.<br>How did the issue of biodiversity emerge? Why are certain categories of living beings ignored? How did the issue of deadwood land on the public-policy agenda? To answer these questions, we used the approach established by Trom and Zimmerman (2001), which identifies the necessary steps toward "institutionalisation" of a public problem, i.e. public criticism of a disturbance, objectivisation of the problem, networking of stakeholders and acceptance of the problem by stakeholders in the field. Using the example of efforts to conserve deadwood in forests, we show that placing an issue on the public agenda does not mean all aspects of biodiversity are involved. In addition, certain potential stakeholders such as forest owners are not inclined to adopt these policies. It is not that they contest the legitimacy of the policy, but rather the procedural aspects from which they feel excluded. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T17:26:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a47df8e58df3411983c624291f1b3104 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2109-3016 1775-3783 |
| language | fra |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T17:26:01Z |
| publishDate | 2010-10-01 |
| publisher | Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sciences, Eaux & Territoires |
| spelling | doaj.art-a47df8e58df3411983c624291f1b31042022-12-21T18:56:03ZfraInstitut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE)Sciences, Eaux & Territoires2109-30161775-37832010-10-01201003132139Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forestsPhilippe Deuffic et Christophe BougetComment la problématique du bois mort est-elle devenue une des composantes importantes des politiques de gestion de la biodiversité en forêt ? Les auteurs nous apportent quelques éléments de réponse sur l'émergence et la prise en compte de cette question dans les politiques de gestion.<br>How did the issue of biodiversity emerge? Why are certain categories of living beings ignored? How did the issue of deadwood land on the public-policy agenda? To answer these questions, we used the approach established by Trom and Zimmerman (2001), which identifies the necessary steps toward "institutionalisation" of a public problem, i.e. public criticism of a disturbance, objectivisation of the problem, networking of stakeholders and acceptance of the problem by stakeholders in the field. Using the example of efforts to conserve deadwood in forests, we show that placing an issue on the public agenda does not mean all aspects of biodiversity are involved. In addition, certain potential stakeholders such as forest owners are not inclined to adopt these policies. It is not that they contest the legitimacy of the policy, but rather the procedural aspects from which they feel excluded.http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/24_article.pdfSOCIOLOGIEBOIS MORTFORETECOLOGIEBIODIVERSITE |
| spellingShingle | Philippe Deuffic et Christophe Bouget Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests Sciences, Eaux & Territoires SOCIOLOGIE BOIS MORT FORET ECOLOGIE BIODIVERSITE |
| title | Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests |
| title_full | Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests |
| title_fullStr | Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests |
| title_full_unstemmed | Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests |
| title_short | Instituer la biodiversité comme problème public, le cas des bois morts en forêt Making biodiversity a public problem, the case of dead wood in forests |
| title_sort | instituer la biodiversite comme probleme public le cas des bois morts en foret making biodiversity a public problem the case of dead wood in forests |
| topic | SOCIOLOGIE BOIS MORT FORET ECOLOGIE BIODIVERSITE |
| url | http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/24_article.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT philippedeufficetchristophebouget instituerlabiodiversitecommeproblemepubliclecasdesboismortsenforetmakingbiodiversityapublicproblemthecaseofdeadwoodinforests |