Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy
Introduction Placement of 088” aspiration catheters in the internal carotid artery (ICA) for aspiration in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been previously described. However, the use and safety of 088” aspiration catheters beyond the ICA has not been established. Here, we report the utilization and...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology |
| Online Access: | https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.201 |
| _version_ | 1797221227710906368 |
|---|---|
| author | Muhammad W. Khan Benjamen M. Meyer Jessica K. Campos Fahad Laghari David A. Zarrin Jonathan C. Collard de Beaufort Gizal Amin Kiarash Golshani Narlin Beaty Matthew T. Bender Geoffrey P. Colby Li‐Mei Lin Alexander L. Coon |
| author_facet | Muhammad W. Khan Benjamen M. Meyer Jessica K. Campos Fahad Laghari David A. Zarrin Jonathan C. Collard de Beaufort Gizal Amin Kiarash Golshani Narlin Beaty Matthew T. Bender Geoffrey P. Colby Li‐Mei Lin Alexander L. Coon |
| author_sort | Muhammad W. Khan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction Placement of 088” aspiration catheters in the internal carotid artery (ICA) for aspiration in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been previously described. However, the use and safety of 088” aspiration catheters beyond the ICA has not been established. Here, we report the utilization and early safety outcomes of 088” catheter placement in the M1 segment for MT. Methods We reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB‐approved database of the senior author to identify consecutive cases where the 088” catheter was navigated to the MCA for use in mechanical thrombectomy. Results We identified 13 cases with placement of an 088” aspiration catheter in the MCA segment (all cases performed in 2023). Average patient age was 71±4 years (range 56‐97 years), with 10 (77%) females, presenting NIHSS was 12±2.1, and 3 (23%) patients received tPA. Location of the thrombus includes 7 (54%) in the M1 and 6 (46%) in the M2. In 13 (100%) cases, the Zoom88 (OD = 2.7 mm, Imperative Care, Campbell, CA) catheter was advanced to at least the M1 segment, and it was used with a coaxial Zoom71 catheter. The average M1 diameter prior to MT was 2.5±0.2mm, 2.3±0.2mm, and 2.2±0.1 in the proximal, mid, and distal M1‐segment, respectively. After MT, the average M1 diameter was 2.4±0.1mm, 2.2±0.1mm, and 2.1±0.2mm in the proximal, mid, and distal M1‐segment, respectively. 85% (n=11) of cases used one or more stentrievers including a Tigertriever, Solitaire, and Trevo. Average number of passes was 1.9±0.2. There were no vessel perforations, catheter‐related dissections, or hemorrhagic complications noted in any case. TICI 2C/3 recanalization was achieved in 100% of cases. The average mRS on discharge was 1.2±0.4. Figure 1. (A) AP angiography demonstrating an M1 branch occlusion (orange). (B) Native view, 088” catheter under aspiration in the MCA (green). (C) Post‐thrombectomy final angiography demonstrating TICI 3 reperfusion. Conclusion The use of large‐bore 088” aspiration catheters in the MCA may offer a safe strategy for direct clot ingestion during mechanical thrombectomy in MCA vasculature that is smaller than the 8‐Fr aspiration catheter. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:37:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a4808de023404330b54bf58b54629b1c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2694-5746 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:02:05Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology |
| spelling | doaj.art-a4808de023404330b54bf58b54629b1c2024-04-05T10:51:58ZengWileyStroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology2694-57462023-11-013S210.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.201Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical ThrombectomyMuhammad W. Khan0Benjamen M. Meyer1Jessica K. Campos2Fahad Laghari3David A. Zarrin4Jonathan C. Collard de Beaufort5Gizal Amin6Kiarash Golshani7Narlin Beaty8Matthew T. Bender9Geoffrey P. Colby10Li‐Mei Lin11Alexander L. Coon12Carondelet Neurological Institute St. Joseph’s Hospital Arizona United StatesUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine ‐ Tucson Arizona United StatesUniversity of California Irvine Department of Neurological Surgery California United StatesCarondelet Neurological Institute St. Joseph’s Hospital Arizona United StatesUniversity of California Los Angeles Department of Neurosurgery California United StatesSyracuse University New York United StatesCarondelet Neurological Institute St. Joseph’s Hospital Arizona United StatesUniversity of California Irvine Department of Neurological Surgery California United StatesFlorida State University Tallahassee Memorial Hospital Florida United StatesUniversity of Rochester New York United StatesUniversity of California Los Angeles Department of Neurosurgery California United StatesCarondelet Neurological Institute St. Joseph’s Hospital Arizona United StatesCarondelet Neurological Institute St. Joseph’s Hospital Arizona United StatesIntroduction Placement of 088” aspiration catheters in the internal carotid artery (ICA) for aspiration in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been previously described. However, the use and safety of 088” aspiration catheters beyond the ICA has not been established. Here, we report the utilization and early safety outcomes of 088” catheter placement in the M1 segment for MT. Methods We reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB‐approved database of the senior author to identify consecutive cases where the 088” catheter was navigated to the MCA for use in mechanical thrombectomy. Results We identified 13 cases with placement of an 088” aspiration catheter in the MCA segment (all cases performed in 2023). Average patient age was 71±4 years (range 56‐97 years), with 10 (77%) females, presenting NIHSS was 12±2.1, and 3 (23%) patients received tPA. Location of the thrombus includes 7 (54%) in the M1 and 6 (46%) in the M2. In 13 (100%) cases, the Zoom88 (OD = 2.7 mm, Imperative Care, Campbell, CA) catheter was advanced to at least the M1 segment, and it was used with a coaxial Zoom71 catheter. The average M1 diameter prior to MT was 2.5±0.2mm, 2.3±0.2mm, and 2.2±0.1 in the proximal, mid, and distal M1‐segment, respectively. After MT, the average M1 diameter was 2.4±0.1mm, 2.2±0.1mm, and 2.1±0.2mm in the proximal, mid, and distal M1‐segment, respectively. 85% (n=11) of cases used one or more stentrievers including a Tigertriever, Solitaire, and Trevo. Average number of passes was 1.9±0.2. There were no vessel perforations, catheter‐related dissections, or hemorrhagic complications noted in any case. TICI 2C/3 recanalization was achieved in 100% of cases. The average mRS on discharge was 1.2±0.4. Figure 1. (A) AP angiography demonstrating an M1 branch occlusion (orange). (B) Native view, 088” catheter under aspiration in the MCA (green). (C) Post‐thrombectomy final angiography demonstrating TICI 3 reperfusion. Conclusion The use of large‐bore 088” aspiration catheters in the MCA may offer a safe strategy for direct clot ingestion during mechanical thrombectomy in MCA vasculature that is smaller than the 8‐Fr aspiration catheter.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.201 |
| spellingShingle | Muhammad W. Khan Benjamen M. Meyer Jessica K. Campos Fahad Laghari David A. Zarrin Jonathan C. Collard de Beaufort Gizal Amin Kiarash Golshani Narlin Beaty Matthew T. Bender Geoffrey P. Colby Li‐Mei Lin Alexander L. Coon Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology |
| title | Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy |
| title_full | Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy |
| title_fullStr | Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy |
| title_short | Abstract 201: Feasibility of an 088” Catheter in the M1 segment for Mechanical Thrombectomy |
| title_sort | abstract 201 feasibility of an 088 catheter in the m1 segment for mechanical thrombectomy |
| url | https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.201 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadwkhan abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT benjamenmmeyer abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT jessicakcampos abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT fahadlaghari abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT davidazarrin abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT jonathanccollarddebeaufort abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT gizalamin abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT kiarashgolshani abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT narlinbeaty abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT matthewtbender abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT geoffreypcolby abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT limeilin abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy AT alexanderlcoon abstract201feasibilityofan088catheterinthem1segmentformechanicalthrombectomy |