Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature

Objective (s): Health literacy is a relatively new emerging concept in public health. It is also a new area for research with links to communication. It has been suggested that poor health literacy poses a major barrier to public’s health and might represent a major cost to health care system. The a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmoud Tavousi, Mahdi Ebadi, Esmaeil Fattahi, Leila Jahangiry, Akram Hashemi, Mina Hashemiparast, Ali Montazeri
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research 2015-08-01
Series:Payesh
Subjects:
Online Access:http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-230-en.html
_version_ 1819009968284631040
author Mahmoud Tavousi
Mahdi Ebadi
Esmaeil Fattahi
Leila Jahangiry
Akram Hashemi
Mina Hashemiparast
Ali Montazeri
author_facet Mahmoud Tavousi
Mahdi Ebadi
Esmaeil Fattahi
Leila Jahangiry
Akram Hashemi
Mina Hashemiparast
Ali Montazeri
author_sort Mahmoud Tavousi
collection DOAJ
description Objective (s): Health literacy is a relatively new emerging concept in public health. It is also a new area for research with links to communication. It has been suggested that poor health literacy poses a major barrier to public’s health and might represent a major cost to health care system. The aim of this study was to review instruments that measure health literacy. Methods: A review was undertaken of all the full publications in the English language biomedical journals between 1993 and 2012. The search included the combination of keywords ‘health literacy’, and ‘tool’, or ‘instrument’, or ‘scale’, or ‘questionnaire’, or ‘measure’, that appeared in the titles/abstracts of the publications. In addition, a manual search was performed to include additional papers of potential interest. Results: In all 1788 citations were identified. After screening, 1265 duplicate citations were excluded. The remaining 523 citations were further examined and 438 citations were found irrelevant. Finally the full texts of 85 papers were assessed. Of these 42 papers were found to be relevant and were included in this systematic review.  We identified 23 instruments that were used to measure health literacy. These all were introduced. Conclusion: Lack of comprehensive instrument to measure health literacy was evident. Thus, developing a new instrument seems necessary. A new tool should be simple, short, and inclusive.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T01:04:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a48ca2eee6934e2196cefe0ac3236086
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7626
2008-4536
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-21T01:04:48Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research
record_format Article
series Payesh
spelling doaj.art-a48ca2eee6934e2196cefe0ac32360862022-12-21T19:21:05ZfasIranian Institute for Health Sciences ResearchPayesh1680-76262008-45362015-08-01144485496Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literatureMahmoud Tavousi0Mahdi Ebadi1Esmaeil Fattahi2Leila Jahangiry3Akram Hashemi4Mina Hashemiparast5Ali Montazeri6 Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institutes for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institutes for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran School of Public Health, Sabzevar University Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran Health education & Promotion Department, School of Public Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz, Iran Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institutes for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institutes for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institutes for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran Objective (s): Health literacy is a relatively new emerging concept in public health. It is also a new area for research with links to communication. It has been suggested that poor health literacy poses a major barrier to public’s health and might represent a major cost to health care system. The aim of this study was to review instruments that measure health literacy. Methods: A review was undertaken of all the full publications in the English language biomedical journals between 1993 and 2012. The search included the combination of keywords ‘health literacy’, and ‘tool’, or ‘instrument’, or ‘scale’, or ‘questionnaire’, or ‘measure’, that appeared in the titles/abstracts of the publications. In addition, a manual search was performed to include additional papers of potential interest. Results: In all 1788 citations were identified. After screening, 1265 duplicate citations were excluded. The remaining 523 citations were further examined and 438 citations were found irrelevant. Finally the full texts of 85 papers were assessed. Of these 42 papers were found to be relevant and were included in this systematic review.  We identified 23 instruments that were used to measure health literacy. These all were introduced. Conclusion: Lack of comprehensive instrument to measure health literacy was evident. Thus, developing a new instrument seems necessary. A new tool should be simple, short, and inclusive.http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-230-en.htmlhealth literacydefinitionsmeasuressystematic review
spellingShingle Mahmoud Tavousi
Mahdi Ebadi
Esmaeil Fattahi
Leila Jahangiry
Akram Hashemi
Mina Hashemiparast
Ali Montazeri
Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature
Payesh
health literacy
definitions
measures
systematic review
title Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature
title_full Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature
title_short Health literacy measures: A systematic review of the literature
title_sort health literacy measures a systematic review of the literature
topic health literacy
definitions
measures
systematic review
url http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-230-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudtavousi healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT mahdiebadi healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT esmaeilfattahi healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT leilajahangiry healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT akramhashemi healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT minahashemiparast healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT alimontazeri healthliteracymeasuresasystematicreviewoftheliterature