Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(2), 599-609 | European Forum Insight of 17 August 2016 | (Table of Contents) I. Premessa. - II. Base giuridica sostanziale e cumulo di basi giuridiche PESC e TFUE. - III. Quale base giuridica sostanziale per l'accor...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
2016-08-01
|
| Series: | European Papers |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/base-giuridica-sostanziale-e-accordi-interpilier-quale-ruolo-per-parlamento-europeo |
| _version_ | 1818726990724726784 |
|---|---|
| author | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni |
| author_facet | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni |
| author_sort | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(2), 599-609 | European Forum Insight of 17 August 2016 | (Table of Contents) I. Premessa. - II. Base giuridica sostanziale e cumulo di basi giuridiche PESC e TFUE. - III. Quale base giuridica sostanziale per l'accordo con la Tanzania? - IV. La soluzione della Corte. - V. Considerazioni conclusive. | (Abstract) It has already been made clear in case-law that a European Union measure - including a decision approving an international agreement - may have a dual substantive legal basis. This is necessary wherever the measure simultaneously pursues a number of objectives, or has several components, which are linked to each other, without one being incidental to the other, so that various provisions of the Treaty are equally applicable. However, a combination of CFSP and other external policies legal basis' is difficult because of the diverging decision-making procedures and instruments. This contribution analyses the Court's approach to competence and choice of legal basis in the context of the agreement EU-Tanzania and argues that, in order to avoid the problems related to such a dual legal basis, the Court has rejected its normal "aim and content" legal bases reasoning. It also examines the implications of the judgment for the role of the European Parliament in the procedure for the conclusion of an international agreement. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T22:06:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a4a8dfc445a04148910db7f2634568af |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2499-8249 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T22:06:59Z |
| publishDate | 2016-08-01 |
| publisher | European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Papers |
| spelling | doaj.art-a4a8dfc445a04148910db7f2634568af2022-12-21T21:30:50ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492016-08-012016 1259960910.15166/2499-8249/63Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso TanzaniaMaria Eugenia Bartoloni0Seconda Università di Napoli(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(2), 599-609 | European Forum Insight of 17 August 2016 | (Table of Contents) I. Premessa. - II. Base giuridica sostanziale e cumulo di basi giuridiche PESC e TFUE. - III. Quale base giuridica sostanziale per l'accordo con la Tanzania? - IV. La soluzione della Corte. - V. Considerazioni conclusive. | (Abstract) It has already been made clear in case-law that a European Union measure - including a decision approving an international agreement - may have a dual substantive legal basis. This is necessary wherever the measure simultaneously pursues a number of objectives, or has several components, which are linked to each other, without one being incidental to the other, so that various provisions of the Treaty are equally applicable. However, a combination of CFSP and other external policies legal basis' is difficult because of the diverging decision-making procedures and instruments. This contribution analyses the Court's approach to competence and choice of legal basis in the context of the agreement EU-Tanzania and argues that, in order to avoid the problems related to such a dual legal basis, the Court has rejected its normal "aim and content" legal bases reasoning. It also examines the implications of the judgment for the role of the European Parliament in the procedure for the conclusion of an international agreement.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/base-giuridica-sostanziale-e-accordi-interpilier-quale-ruolo-per-parlamento-europeocjeuinterpillar agreementssubstantive legal basiscfspeuropean parliamentprocedure for the conclusion of an international agreement |
| spellingShingle | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania European Papers cjeu interpillar agreements substantive legal basis cfsp european parliament procedure for the conclusion of an international agreement |
| title | Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania |
| title_full | Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania |
| title_fullStr | Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania |
| title_full_unstemmed | Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania |
| title_short | Base giuridica sostanziale e accordi 'interpilier': quale ruolo per il Parlamento europeo? Note a margine del caso Tanzania |
| title_sort | base giuridica sostanziale e accordi interpilier quale ruolo per il parlamento europeo note a margine del caso tanzania |
| topic | cjeu interpillar agreements substantive legal basis cfsp european parliament procedure for the conclusion of an international agreement |
| url | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/base-giuridica-sostanziale-e-accordi-interpilier-quale-ruolo-per-parlamento-europeo |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariaeugeniabartoloni basegiuridicasostanzialeeaccordiinterpilierqualeruoloperilparlamentoeuropeonoteamarginedelcasotanzania |