Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review

STEM education programs with educational robotics are frequently used in formal or informal education, with participants ranging from kindergarten children up to university students. The widespread implementation of these programs in schools and the growing interest of researchers in the field has l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sokratis Tselegkaridis, Theodosios Sapounidis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/5/305
_version_ 1797500388381818880
author Sokratis Tselegkaridis
Theodosios Sapounidis
author_facet Sokratis Tselegkaridis
Theodosios Sapounidis
author_sort Sokratis Tselegkaridis
collection DOAJ
description STEM education programs with educational robotics are frequently used in formal or informal education, with participants ranging from kindergarten children up to university students. The widespread implementation of these programs in schools and the growing interest of researchers in the field has led several authors/researchers to review and summarize the characteristics of STEM research. However, the literature on the features of STEM research in primary education (kindergarten and primary school) is limited. Therefore, this article is a systematic literature review that tries to enrich the STEM agenda by answering the questions: (a) which study designs are commonly used in STEM interventions, (b) what the characteristics of the sample are (number/age of the students), (c) which equipment and user interfaces (tangible/graphical) are used, and (d) what are the characteristics of the studies (duration, intervention objectives, activities) and how studies’ data were recorded. For this review, 36 out of 337 articles were analyzed and emerged from eight databases, three search-keywords and six exclusion criteria. The examination of the reviewed articles showed, inter alia, that non-experimental design is usually used, that in half of the cases written evaluations are used and the sample size is almost equal between girls and boys. Finally, long-term research is restricted, therefore it is not safe to generalize the findings of these studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:01:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4af9638117944d3b70fcc6d12c5028f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:01:01Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a4af9638117944d3b70fcc6d12c5028f2023-11-23T10:45:14ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022022-04-0112530510.3390/educsci12050305Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature ReviewSokratis Tselegkaridis0Theodosios Sapounidis1Department of Information and Electronic Engineering, International Hellenic University (IHU), 57400 Thessaloniki, GreeceDepartment of Information and Electronic Engineering, International Hellenic University (IHU), 57400 Thessaloniki, GreeceSTEM education programs with educational robotics are frequently used in formal or informal education, with participants ranging from kindergarten children up to university students. The widespread implementation of these programs in schools and the growing interest of researchers in the field has led several authors/researchers to review and summarize the characteristics of STEM research. However, the literature on the features of STEM research in primary education (kindergarten and primary school) is limited. Therefore, this article is a systematic literature review that tries to enrich the STEM agenda by answering the questions: (a) which study designs are commonly used in STEM interventions, (b) what the characteristics of the sample are (number/age of the students), (c) which equipment and user interfaces (tangible/graphical) are used, and (d) what are the characteristics of the studies (duration, intervention objectives, activities) and how studies’ data were recorded. For this review, 36 out of 337 articles were analyzed and emerged from eight databases, three search-keywords and six exclusion criteria. The examination of the reviewed articles showed, inter alia, that non-experimental design is usually used, that in half of the cases written evaluations are used and the sample size is almost equal between girls and boys. Finally, long-term research is restricted, therefore it is not safe to generalize the findings of these studies.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/5/305primary educationeducational roboticssystematic literature review
spellingShingle Sokratis Tselegkaridis
Theodosios Sapounidis
Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Education Sciences
primary education
educational robotics
systematic literature review
title Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort exploring the features of educational robotics and stem research in primary education a systematic literature review
topic primary education
educational robotics
systematic literature review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/5/305
work_keys_str_mv AT sokratistselegkaridis exploringthefeaturesofeducationalroboticsandstemresearchinprimaryeducationasystematicliteraturereview
AT theodosiossapounidis exploringthefeaturesofeducationalroboticsandstemresearchinprimaryeducationasystematicliteraturereview