The Mental States First Theory of Promising

Most theories of promising are insufficiently broad, for they ground promissory obligation in some external or contingent feature of the promise. In this paper, I introduce a new kind of theory. The Mental States First (MSF) theory grounds promissory obligation in something internal and essentia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alida Liberman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Philosophie.ch 2022-11-01
Series:Dialectica
Online Access:https://dialectica.philosophie.ch/dialectica/article/view/33
_version_ 1797851456101941248
author Alida Liberman
author_facet Alida Liberman
author_sort Alida Liberman
collection DOAJ
description Most theories of promising are insufficiently broad, for they ground promissory obligation in some external or contingent feature of the promise. In this paper, I introduce a new kind of theory. The Mental States First (MSF) theory grounds promissory obligation in something internal and essential: the mental state expressed by promising, or the state that promisors purport to be in. My defense of MSF relies on three claims. First, promising to Φ expresses that you have resolved to Φ. Second, resolving to Φ commits you to Φing, all else being equal. Third, the norms on speech acts are determined by the norms on the mental states they express, such that publicly expressing that you are in a state subjects you to whatever commitments are normally incurred by being in that state, regardless of whether you really are in it. I suggest that this general approach might also explain how the norms on other sorts of speech acts work.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:18:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4afa4265ca1442da8d2fc5de8ef9f06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0012-2017
1746-8361
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:18:11Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Philosophie.ch
record_format Article
series Dialectica
spelling doaj.art-a4afa4265ca1442da8d2fc5de8ef9f062023-04-06T01:04:39ZengPhilosophie.chDialectica0012-20171746-83612022-11-01999110.48106/dial.v74.i4.03The Mental States First Theory of PromisingAlida Liberman Most theories of promising are insufficiently broad, for they ground promissory obligation in some external or contingent feature of the promise. In this paper, I introduce a new kind of theory. The Mental States First (MSF) theory grounds promissory obligation in something internal and essential: the mental state expressed by promising, or the state that promisors purport to be in. My defense of MSF relies on three claims. First, promising to Φ expresses that you have resolved to Φ. Second, resolving to Φ commits you to Φing, all else being equal. Third, the norms on speech acts are determined by the norms on the mental states they express, such that publicly expressing that you are in a state subjects you to whatever commitments are normally incurred by being in that state, regardless of whether you really are in it. I suggest that this general approach might also explain how the norms on other sorts of speech acts work. https://dialectica.philosophie.ch/dialectica/article/view/33
spellingShingle Alida Liberman
The Mental States First Theory of Promising
Dialectica
title The Mental States First Theory of Promising
title_full The Mental States First Theory of Promising
title_fullStr The Mental States First Theory of Promising
title_full_unstemmed The Mental States First Theory of Promising
title_short The Mental States First Theory of Promising
title_sort mental states first theory of promising
url https://dialectica.philosophie.ch/dialectica/article/view/33
work_keys_str_mv AT alidaliberman thementalstatesfirsttheoryofpromising
AT alidaliberman mentalstatesfirsttheoryofpromising