Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment

Traditional (silage) maize production often has negative side-effects related to unprotected soil surface. There are several possibilities to enhance system sustainability through reducing soil disturbance. However, implementation may be hindered due to reduced nitrogen availability and increased we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fruzsina Schmidt, Herwart Böhm, Hans-Peter Piepho, Peer Urbatzka, Michael Wachendorf, Rüdiger Graß
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/9/2104
_version_ 1797492178280251392
author Fruzsina Schmidt
Herwart Böhm
Hans-Peter Piepho
Peer Urbatzka
Michael Wachendorf
Rüdiger Graß
author_facet Fruzsina Schmidt
Herwart Böhm
Hans-Peter Piepho
Peer Urbatzka
Michael Wachendorf
Rüdiger Graß
author_sort Fruzsina Schmidt
collection DOAJ
description Traditional (silage) maize production often has negative side-effects related to unprotected soil surface. There are several possibilities to enhance system sustainability through reducing soil disturbance. However, implementation may be hindered due to reduced nitrogen availability and increased weed infestation, especially in organic agriculture. A field experiment to evaluate yield potential of 18 silage maize cropping systems under organic management was conducted at three distinct locations. Examined parameters were first crop, maize and total harvested dry matter yield (DMY), and maize dry matter content (DMC). Treatment factors included <i>first crop</i> (<i>FC</i>—winter pea, hairy vetch, and their mixtures with rye, control (SCS), <i>management</i>—incorporating <i>FC use</i> and <i>tillage</i> (double cropping system no-till (DCS NT), double cropping system reduced till (DCS RT), double cropped, mulched system terminated with roller-crimper (DCMS Roll), SCS control), <i>fertilization</i>, <i>mechanical weed control</i>—and <i>row width</i> (75 cm, 50 cm). A high variation among environments occurred, but similar patterns manifested across locations: Number of crops in the rotation had a high influence, followed by <i>management</i> and <i>FC</i>. <i>Row width</i> had only marginal and inconsistent effect. FC mixtures generally yielded higher than pure legumes. Maize DMY in DCS, DCMS was lower than or comparable to SCS. Maize DMC were environment-specifically below acceptable range, especially under DCMS. Total harvested DMY in DCS were similar to or greater than SCS. Results suggest differences from the optimization of farming operations for one (SCS) or two crops (DCS, DCMS) with strong effects at early maize development and on the length of season. <i>FC use</i> and <i>tillage</i> factors possibly altered the soil water, temperature, and mineralization dynamics, resulting in modified maize growth. DCS RT and DCMS Pure performed with the best maize yields, improved soil protection, and tillage reduction in the silage maize part of the rotation under organic management. However, alternative management systems, especially under DCS NT and DCMS (Mix) with studied maize maturity classes are less suited, particularly in cool and wet spring conditions, because of a potentially slower development of FC, a later establishment of maize plants and therefore, a shorter growing season for the maize crop.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:59:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4b34255fe484e8c9804244b714af6d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:59:53Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-a4b34255fe484e8c9804244b714af6d82023-11-23T14:37:24ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952022-09-01129210410.3390/agronomy12092104Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site ExperimentFruzsina Schmidt0Herwart Böhm1Hans-Peter Piepho2Peer Urbatzka3Michael Wachendorf4Rüdiger Graß5Grassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Science, Universität Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, GermanyJohann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Institute of Organic Farming, Trenthorst 32, 23847 Westerau, GermanyBiostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599 Stuttgart, GermanyInstitute for Organic Farming, Soil and Resource Management, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Lange Point 12, 85354 Freising, GermanyGrassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Science, Universität Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, GermanyGrassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Science, Universität Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, GermanyTraditional (silage) maize production often has negative side-effects related to unprotected soil surface. There are several possibilities to enhance system sustainability through reducing soil disturbance. However, implementation may be hindered due to reduced nitrogen availability and increased weed infestation, especially in organic agriculture. A field experiment to evaluate yield potential of 18 silage maize cropping systems under organic management was conducted at three distinct locations. Examined parameters were first crop, maize and total harvested dry matter yield (DMY), and maize dry matter content (DMC). Treatment factors included <i>first crop</i> (<i>FC</i>—winter pea, hairy vetch, and their mixtures with rye, control (SCS), <i>management</i>—incorporating <i>FC use</i> and <i>tillage</i> (double cropping system no-till (DCS NT), double cropping system reduced till (DCS RT), double cropped, mulched system terminated with roller-crimper (DCMS Roll), SCS control), <i>fertilization</i>, <i>mechanical weed control</i>—and <i>row width</i> (75 cm, 50 cm). A high variation among environments occurred, but similar patterns manifested across locations: Number of crops in the rotation had a high influence, followed by <i>management</i> and <i>FC</i>. <i>Row width</i> had only marginal and inconsistent effect. FC mixtures generally yielded higher than pure legumes. Maize DMY in DCS, DCMS was lower than or comparable to SCS. Maize DMC were environment-specifically below acceptable range, especially under DCMS. Total harvested DMY in DCS were similar to or greater than SCS. Results suggest differences from the optimization of farming operations for one (SCS) or two crops (DCS, DCMS) with strong effects at early maize development and on the length of season. <i>FC use</i> and <i>tillage</i> factors possibly altered the soil water, temperature, and mineralization dynamics, resulting in modified maize growth. DCS RT and DCMS Pure performed with the best maize yields, improved soil protection, and tillage reduction in the silage maize part of the rotation under organic management. However, alternative management systems, especially under DCS NT and DCMS (Mix) with studied maize maturity classes are less suited, particularly in cool and wet spring conditions, because of a potentially slower development of FC, a later establishment of maize plants and therefore, a shorter growing season for the maize crop.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/9/2104silage maizeorganic agriculturewinter cover cropdouble cropping systemroller-crimpertillage
spellingShingle Fruzsina Schmidt
Herwart Böhm
Hans-Peter Piepho
Peer Urbatzka
Michael Wachendorf
Rüdiger Graß
Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment
Agronomy
silage maize
organic agriculture
winter cover crop
double cropping system
roller-crimper
tillage
title Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment
title_full Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment
title_fullStr Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment
title_short Management Effects on the Performance of Double Cropping Systems—Results from a Multi-Site Experiment
title_sort management effects on the performance of double cropping systems results from a multi site experiment
topic silage maize
organic agriculture
winter cover crop
double cropping system
roller-crimper
tillage
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/9/2104
work_keys_str_mv AT fruzsinaschmidt managementeffectsontheperformanceofdoublecroppingsystemsresultsfromamultisiteexperiment
AT herwartbohm managementeffectsontheperformanceofdoublecroppingsystemsresultsfromamultisiteexperiment
AT hanspeterpiepho managementeffectsontheperformanceofdoublecroppingsystemsresultsfromamultisiteexperiment
AT peerurbatzka managementeffectsontheperformanceofdoublecroppingsystemsresultsfromamultisiteexperiment
AT michaelwachendorf managementeffectsontheperformanceofdoublecroppingsystemsresultsfromamultisiteexperiment
AT rudigergraß managementeffectsontheperformanceofdoublecroppingsystemsresultsfromamultisiteexperiment