Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Background and study aims The clinical outcome of the new hybrid drainage method for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) has not yet been compared with that of the partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) method with three or more stents. Patients and methods Patients with UMHBO...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Motohiro Yoshinari, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Akihiro Ohba, Yuki Kawasaki, Kotaro Takeshita, Chigusa Morizane, Yasuhito Tanaka, Takuji Okusaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-03-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2039-3936
_version_ 1827980958163271680
author Motohiro Yoshinari
Susumu Hijioka
Yoshikuni Nagashio
Yuta Maruki
Akihiro Ohba
Yuki Kawasaki
Kotaro Takeshita
Chigusa Morizane
Yasuhito Tanaka
Takuji Okusaka
author_facet Motohiro Yoshinari
Susumu Hijioka
Yoshikuni Nagashio
Yuta Maruki
Akihiro Ohba
Yuki Kawasaki
Kotaro Takeshita
Chigusa Morizane
Yasuhito Tanaka
Takuji Okusaka
author_sort Motohiro Yoshinari
collection DOAJ
description Background and study aims The clinical outcome of the new hybrid drainage method for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) has not yet been compared with that of the partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) method with three or more stents. Patients and methods Patients with UMHBO underwent drainage of three segments using the hybrid or PSIS method. The clinical outcomes of both methods were compared retrospectively. Results Overall, 54 patients underwent the hybrid (n = 31) or PSIS (n = 23) method of drainage with three or more stents for UMHBO. There were no significant differences in the technical success rate (hybrid vs. PSIS, 87.1 % vs. 87 %), clinical success rate according to per-protocol analysis (81.5 % vs. 70 %), early adverse events rate (14.8 % vs. 10%), late adverse events rate (7.4 % vs. 0 %), and technical success rate of the endoscopic transpapillary reintervention (90.9 % vs. 100 %). Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) of the hybrid and PSIS methods was 178 and 231 days, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.354). Conclusions The choice between the two methods should be made at the physician’s discretion.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:01:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4b50de606be464d94a0af3b2fa086d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:01:13Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-a4b50de606be464d94a0af3b2fa086d02023-03-24T00:03:56ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362023-03-011103E276E28310.1055/a-2039-3936Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstructionMotohiro Yoshinari0Susumu Hijioka1Yoshikuni Nagashio2Yuta Maruki3Akihiro Ohba4Yuki Kawasaki5Kotaro Takeshita6Chigusa Morizane7Yasuhito Tanaka8Takuji Okusaka9National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanKumamoto University, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto, JapanNational Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, JapanBackground and study aims The clinical outcome of the new hybrid drainage method for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) has not yet been compared with that of the partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) method with three or more stents. Patients and methods Patients with UMHBO underwent drainage of three segments using the hybrid or PSIS method. The clinical outcomes of both methods were compared retrospectively. Results Overall, 54 patients underwent the hybrid (n = 31) or PSIS (n = 23) method of drainage with three or more stents for UMHBO. There were no significant differences in the technical success rate (hybrid vs. PSIS, 87.1 % vs. 87 %), clinical success rate according to per-protocol analysis (81.5 % vs. 70 %), early adverse events rate (14.8 % vs. 10%), late adverse events rate (7.4 % vs. 0 %), and technical success rate of the endoscopic transpapillary reintervention (90.9 % vs. 100 %). Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) of the hybrid and PSIS methods was 178 and 231 days, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.354). Conclusions The choice between the two methods should be made at the physician’s discretion.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2039-3936
spellingShingle Motohiro Yoshinari
Susumu Hijioka
Yoshikuni Nagashio
Yuta Maruki
Akihiro Ohba
Yuki Kawasaki
Kotaro Takeshita
Chigusa Morizane
Yasuhito Tanaka
Takuji Okusaka
Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
Endoscopy International Open
title Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
title_full Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
title_short Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
title_sort comparison of the hybrid and partial stent in stent method for endoscopic three segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2039-3936
work_keys_str_mv AT motohiroyoshinari comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT susumuhijioka comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT yoshikuninagashio comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT yutamaruki comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT akihiroohba comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT yukikawasaki comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT kotarotakeshita comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT chigusamorizane comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT yasuhitotanaka comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction
AT takujiokusaka comparisonofthehybridandpartialstentinstentmethodforendoscopicthreesegmentdrainageforunresectablemalignanthilarbiliaryobstruction