Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin

Objectives: To elicit actual clinical practice of treating intensive care unit patients with catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin from a hospital perspective. As clinical trials have demonstrated similar efficacy of these glycopeptides, a cost-minimisation analysis was also car...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simoens S, De Corte N, Laekeman G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2006-06-01
Series:Pharmacy Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pharmacypractice.org/vol04/02/068-073.htm
_version_ 1818978271523504128
author Simoens S
De Corte N
Laekeman G
author_facet Simoens S
De Corte N
Laekeman G
author_sort Simoens S
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To elicit actual clinical practice of treating intensive care unit patients with catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin from a hospital perspective. As clinical trials have demonstrated similar efficacy of these glycopeptides, a cost-minimisation analysis was also carried out. Methods: The Delphi survey technique was used to gather the opinion of nine physicians regarding resource utilization associated with teicoplanin and vancomycin. Treatment costs considered were costs of drug acquisition, costs of material and nursing time required for drug preparation and administration, and costs of laboratory tests. Results: Physicians tend to administer higher loading doses of teicoplanin than recommended in the drug information leaflet. Even though evidence of the effectiveness of vancomycin is mainly derived from trials using multiple-daily administration schedules, five physicians administered it on a once-daily basis. Mean treatment costs amounted to 1,272€ with teicoplanin and 1,041€ with vancomycin. Higher treatment costs with teicoplanin arose from more elevated drug acquisition costs (1,076€ versus 795€). Treatment with vancomycin was associated with higher costs of laboratory tests as a result of more frequent monitoring of serum concentrations (217€ versus 150€). Conclusions: This analysis of clinical practice and costs indicated that the resource utilisation advantages from fewer laboratory tests with teicoplanin partially offset higher drug acquisition costs. In addition to efficacy and costs, other factors such as route of administration, patient profile and adverse effects need to inform the choice between teicoplanin and vancomycin.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:40:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4c31ce1e4874f33908e2111352dd0f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1885-642X
1886-3655
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:40:59Z
publishDate 2006-06-01
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format Article
series Pharmacy Practice
spelling doaj.art-a4c31ce1e4874f33908e2111352dd0f12022-12-21T19:33:02ZengCentro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones FarmaceuticasPharmacy Practice1885-642X1886-36552006-06-01426873Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycinSimoens SDe Corte NLaekeman GObjectives: To elicit actual clinical practice of treating intensive care unit patients with catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin from a hospital perspective. As clinical trials have demonstrated similar efficacy of these glycopeptides, a cost-minimisation analysis was also carried out. Methods: The Delphi survey technique was used to gather the opinion of nine physicians regarding resource utilization associated with teicoplanin and vancomycin. Treatment costs considered were costs of drug acquisition, costs of material and nursing time required for drug preparation and administration, and costs of laboratory tests. Results: Physicians tend to administer higher loading doses of teicoplanin than recommended in the drug information leaflet. Even though evidence of the effectiveness of vancomycin is mainly derived from trials using multiple-daily administration schedules, five physicians administered it on a once-daily basis. Mean treatment costs amounted to 1,272€ with teicoplanin and 1,041€ with vancomycin. Higher treatment costs with teicoplanin arose from more elevated drug acquisition costs (1,076€ versus 795€). Treatment with vancomycin was associated with higher costs of laboratory tests as a result of more frequent monitoring of serum concentrations (217€ versus 150€). Conclusions: This analysis of clinical practice and costs indicated that the resource utilisation advantages from fewer laboratory tests with teicoplanin partially offset higher drug acquisition costs. In addition to efficacy and costs, other factors such as route of administration, patient profile and adverse effects need to inform the choice between teicoplanin and vancomycin.http://www.pharmacypractice.org/vol04/02/068-073.htmGlycopeptideTeicoplaninVancomycinCost minimisation analysisBelgium.
spellingShingle Simoens S
De Corte N
Laekeman G
Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
Pharmacy Practice
Glycopeptide
Teicoplanin
Vancomycin
Cost minimisation analysis
Belgium.
title Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
title_full Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
title_fullStr Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
title_full_unstemmed Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
title_short Clinical practice and costs of treating catheter-related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
title_sort clinical practice and costs of treating catheter related infections with teicoplanin or vancomycin
topic Glycopeptide
Teicoplanin
Vancomycin
Cost minimisation analysis
Belgium.
url http://www.pharmacypractice.org/vol04/02/068-073.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT simoenss clinicalpracticeandcostsoftreatingcatheterrelatedinfectionswithteicoplaninorvancomycin
AT decorten clinicalpracticeandcostsoftreatingcatheterrelatedinfectionswithteicoplaninorvancomycin
AT laekemang clinicalpracticeandcostsoftreatingcatheterrelatedinfectionswithteicoplaninorvancomycin