Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much

Individuals differ in their ability to create instances of emotion that are precise and context-specific. This skill – referred to as emotional granularity or emotion differentiation – is associated with positive mental health outcomes. To date, however, little work has examined whether and how emot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katie Hoemann, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Karen S. Quigley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704125/full
_version_ 1819091409973542912
author Katie Hoemann
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Karen S. Quigley
Karen S. Quigley
author_facet Katie Hoemann
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Karen S. Quigley
Karen S. Quigley
author_sort Katie Hoemann
collection DOAJ
description Individuals differ in their ability to create instances of emotion that are precise and context-specific. This skill – referred to as emotional granularity or emotion differentiation – is associated with positive mental health outcomes. To date, however, little work has examined whether and how emotional granularity might be increased. Emotional granularity is typically measured using data from experience sampling studies, in which participants are prompted to report on their emotional experiences multiple times per day, across multiple days. This measurement approach allows researchers to examine patterns of responses over time using real-world events. Recent work suggests that experience sampling itself may facilitate increases in emotional granularity in depressed individuals, such that it may serve both empirical and interventional functions. We replicated and extended these findings in healthy adults, using data from an intensive ambulatory assessment study including experience sampling, peripheral physiological monitoring, and end-of-day diaries. We also identified factors that might distinguish individuals who showed larger increases over the course of experience sampling and examined the extent of the impact of these factors. We found that increases in emotional granularity over time were facilitated by methodological factors, such as number of experience sampling prompts responded to per day, as well as individual factors, such as resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia. These results provide support for the use of experience sampling methods to improve emotional granularity, raise questions about the boundary conditions of this effect, and have implications for the conceptualization of emotional granularity and its relationship with emotional health.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:39:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4cdfc1bfa6447dea6871601cb2b5cb1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:39:16Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-a4cdfc1bfa6447dea6871601cb2b5cb12022-12-21T18:47:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-07-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.704125704125Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How MuchKatie Hoemann0Lisa Feldman Barrett1Lisa Feldman Barrett2Lisa Feldman Barrett3Karen S. Quigley4Karen S. Quigley5Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United StatesAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United StatesBedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, United StatesIndividuals differ in their ability to create instances of emotion that are precise and context-specific. This skill – referred to as emotional granularity or emotion differentiation – is associated with positive mental health outcomes. To date, however, little work has examined whether and how emotional granularity might be increased. Emotional granularity is typically measured using data from experience sampling studies, in which participants are prompted to report on their emotional experiences multiple times per day, across multiple days. This measurement approach allows researchers to examine patterns of responses over time using real-world events. Recent work suggests that experience sampling itself may facilitate increases in emotional granularity in depressed individuals, such that it may serve both empirical and interventional functions. We replicated and extended these findings in healthy adults, using data from an intensive ambulatory assessment study including experience sampling, peripheral physiological monitoring, and end-of-day diaries. We also identified factors that might distinguish individuals who showed larger increases over the course of experience sampling and examined the extent of the impact of these factors. We found that increases in emotional granularity over time were facilitated by methodological factors, such as number of experience sampling prompts responded to per day, as well as individual factors, such as resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia. These results provide support for the use of experience sampling methods to improve emotional granularity, raise questions about the boundary conditions of this effect, and have implications for the conceptualization of emotional granularity and its relationship with emotional health.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704125/fullemotional granularityemotion differentiationexperience samplingecological momentary assessmentdaily diaryambulatory assessment
spellingShingle Katie Hoemann
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Karen S. Quigley
Karen S. Quigley
Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much
Frontiers in Psychology
emotional granularity
emotion differentiation
experience sampling
ecological momentary assessment
daily diary
ambulatory assessment
title Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much
title_full Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much
title_fullStr Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much
title_short Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much
title_sort emotional granularity increases with intensive ambulatory assessment methodological and individual factors influence how much
topic emotional granularity
emotion differentiation
experience sampling
ecological momentary assessment
daily diary
ambulatory assessment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704125/full
work_keys_str_mv AT katiehoemann emotionalgranularityincreaseswithintensiveambulatoryassessmentmethodologicalandindividualfactorsinfluencehowmuch
AT lisafeldmanbarrett emotionalgranularityincreaseswithintensiveambulatoryassessmentmethodologicalandindividualfactorsinfluencehowmuch
AT lisafeldmanbarrett emotionalgranularityincreaseswithintensiveambulatoryassessmentmethodologicalandindividualfactorsinfluencehowmuch
AT lisafeldmanbarrett emotionalgranularityincreaseswithintensiveambulatoryassessmentmethodologicalandindividualfactorsinfluencehowmuch
AT karensquigley emotionalgranularityincreaseswithintensiveambulatoryassessmentmethodologicalandindividualfactorsinfluencehowmuch
AT karensquigley emotionalgranularityincreaseswithintensiveambulatoryassessmentmethodologicalandindividualfactorsinfluencehowmuch