The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), focusing on its validity and reliability. Methods: The external validity was evaluated by the assessment of sampling procedures and the response rate, in order to investigate the repr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Young Sun Kim, Kyung Yong Rhee, Min Jung Oh, Jungsun Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-06-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000085
_version_ 1797757550728314880
author Young Sun Kim
Kyung Yong Rhee
Min Jung Oh
Jungsun Park
author_facet Young Sun Kim
Kyung Yong Rhee
Min Jung Oh
Jungsun Park
author_sort Young Sun Kim
collection DOAJ
description Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), focusing on its validity and reliability. Methods: The external validity was evaluated by the assessment of sampling procedures and the response rate, in order to investigate the representativeness of the sample. The content validity was evaluated by the assessment of the development of the questionnaire, and the consistency of questions for the selected construct. The test-retest method was used to evaluate the reliability by means of a phone call survey of 30% of the respondents, who were randomly selected. The respondents' satisfaction regarding the survey procedures and interview time were analyzed to evaluate the quality of survey data. Results: The external validity was assured by an acceptable sampling procedure, rigid multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling. The content validity was also guaranteed by a reasonable procedure for the development of the questionnaire with a pretest. The internal consistency of the questions for work autonomy was maintained, with 0.738 of Cronbach's alpha. The response rate of 36% was lower than that of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS), with a contact rate of 66%, compared to 76% for the EWCS. The matching rates of the five retested questions were more than 98% reliable. Conclusion: The quality of the second KWCS was assured by the high external and content validity and reliability. The rigid sampling procedure and development of the questionnaire contributed to quality assurance. The high level of reliability may be guaranteed by the sophisticated field survey procedures and the development of a technical manual for interviewers. The technical strategies for a high response rate should be developed for future surveys.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:17:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4e1f763c2ae47c8acab18fa121e73f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2093-7911
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:17:22Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Safety and Health at Work
spelling doaj.art-a4e1f763c2ae47c8acab18fa121e73f82023-08-02T09:04:03ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112013-06-014211111610.1016/j.shaw.2013.05.001The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions SurveyYoung Sun KimKyung Yong RheeMin Jung OhJungsun ParkBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), focusing on its validity and reliability. Methods: The external validity was evaluated by the assessment of sampling procedures and the response rate, in order to investigate the representativeness of the sample. The content validity was evaluated by the assessment of the development of the questionnaire, and the consistency of questions for the selected construct. The test-retest method was used to evaluate the reliability by means of a phone call survey of 30% of the respondents, who were randomly selected. The respondents' satisfaction regarding the survey procedures and interview time were analyzed to evaluate the quality of survey data. Results: The external validity was assured by an acceptable sampling procedure, rigid multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling. The content validity was also guaranteed by a reasonable procedure for the development of the questionnaire with a pretest. The internal consistency of the questions for work autonomy was maintained, with 0.738 of Cronbach's alpha. The response rate of 36% was lower than that of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS), with a contact rate of 66%, compared to 76% for the EWCS. The matching rates of the five retested questions were more than 98% reliable. Conclusion: The quality of the second KWCS was assured by the high external and content validity and reliability. The rigid sampling procedure and development of the questionnaire contributed to quality assurance. The high level of reliability may be guaranteed by the sophisticated field survey procedures and the development of a technical manual for interviewers. The technical strategies for a high response rate should be developed for future surveys.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000085European Working Conditions SurveyKorean Working Conditions Surveyreliabilityvalidity
spellingShingle Young Sun Kim
Kyung Yong Rhee
Min Jung Oh
Jungsun Park
The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey
Safety and Health at Work
European Working Conditions Survey
Korean Working Conditions Survey
reliability
validity
title The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_full The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_fullStr The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_full_unstemmed The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_short The Validity and Reliability of the Second Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_sort validity and reliability of the second korean working conditions survey
topic European Working Conditions Survey
Korean Working Conditions Survey
reliability
validity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000085
work_keys_str_mv AT youngsunkim thevalidityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT kyungyongrhee thevalidityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT minjungoh thevalidityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT jungsunpark thevalidityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT youngsunkim validityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT kyungyongrhee validityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT minjungoh validityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT jungsunpark validityandreliabilityofthesecondkoreanworkingconditionssurvey