Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review
Abstract Background Ameloblastoma (AM), the benign counterpart of ameloblastic carcinoma, is a benign odontogenic tumor of epithelial origin, naturally aggressive, with unlimited growth potential and a high tendency to relapse if not adequately removed. Patients with AM treated surgically can benefi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03765-7 |
| _version_ | 1797376788637155328 |
|---|---|
| author | Mario Alberto Alarcón-Sánchez Julieta Sarai Becerra-Ruíz Lazar Yessayan Seyed Ali Mosaddad Artak Heboyan |
| author_facet | Mario Alberto Alarcón-Sánchez Julieta Sarai Becerra-Ruíz Lazar Yessayan Seyed Ali Mosaddad Artak Heboyan |
| author_sort | Mario Alberto Alarcón-Sánchez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Ameloblastoma (AM), the benign counterpart of ameloblastic carcinoma, is a benign odontogenic tumor of epithelial origin, naturally aggressive, with unlimited growth potential and a high tendency to relapse if not adequately removed. Patients with AM treated surgically can benefit from dental implant therapy, promoting oral rehabilitation and improving their quality of life. The present study aimed to determine the survival rate of dental implants placed after surgical treatment of patients affected by AM. In addition, there were two secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate which dental implant loading protocols are most frequently used and 2) To determine the type of prosthetic restoration most commonly used in these patients. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during the study. Searches were performed in three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar) until November 2023. Additionally, the electronic search was enriched by an iterative hand search of journals related to oral pathology and medicine, maxillofacial surgery, and oral prosthodontics and implantology. Only reports and case series in English from January 2003 to date were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool (JBI-Case Reports/Case Series) was used for the study quality assessment. Results The total number of patients and implants studied were 64 and 271, respectively, all with surgically treated AM. The patient’s ages ranged from 8 to 79 years, with a mean (SD) age of 37.3 ± 16.4. Fifty-three percent were male and 47% were female. The range of follow-up duration was 1 to 22 years. An implant survival/success rate of 98.1% was reported. In addition, most of them were conventionally loaded (38.3%). Hybrid implant-supported fixed dentures were the most commonly used by prosthodontists (53%). Conclusions Oral rehabilitation with dental implants inserted in free flaps for orofacial reconstruction in surgically treated patients with AM can be considered a safe and successful treatment modality. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:43:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a4e8889a95be4e7baf2683f1b94bd07b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:43:40Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-a4e8889a95be4e7baf2683f1b94bd07b2023-12-24T12:31:18ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312023-12-0123112010.1186/s12903-023-03765-7Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic reviewMario Alberto Alarcón-Sánchez0Julieta Sarai Becerra-Ruíz1Lazar Yessayan2Seyed Ali Mosaddad3Artak Heboyan4Biomedical Science, Faculty of Chemical-Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of GuerreroInstitute of Research of Bioscience, University Center of Los Altos, University of GuadalajaraDepartment of Therapeutic Stomatology, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar HeratsiStudent Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar HeratsiAbstract Background Ameloblastoma (AM), the benign counterpart of ameloblastic carcinoma, is a benign odontogenic tumor of epithelial origin, naturally aggressive, with unlimited growth potential and a high tendency to relapse if not adequately removed. Patients with AM treated surgically can benefit from dental implant therapy, promoting oral rehabilitation and improving their quality of life. The present study aimed to determine the survival rate of dental implants placed after surgical treatment of patients affected by AM. In addition, there were two secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate which dental implant loading protocols are most frequently used and 2) To determine the type of prosthetic restoration most commonly used in these patients. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during the study. Searches were performed in three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar) until November 2023. Additionally, the electronic search was enriched by an iterative hand search of journals related to oral pathology and medicine, maxillofacial surgery, and oral prosthodontics and implantology. Only reports and case series in English from January 2003 to date were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool (JBI-Case Reports/Case Series) was used for the study quality assessment. Results The total number of patients and implants studied were 64 and 271, respectively, all with surgically treated AM. The patient’s ages ranged from 8 to 79 years, with a mean (SD) age of 37.3 ± 16.4. Fifty-three percent were male and 47% were female. The range of follow-up duration was 1 to 22 years. An implant survival/success rate of 98.1% was reported. In addition, most of them were conventionally loaded (38.3%). Hybrid implant-supported fixed dentures were the most commonly used by prosthodontists (53%). Conclusions Oral rehabilitation with dental implants inserted in free flaps for orofacial reconstruction in surgically treated patients with AM can be considered a safe and successful treatment modality.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03765-7Dental implantsSurvival rateDental prosthesisImplant-supportedAmeloblastoma |
| spellingShingle | Mario Alberto Alarcón-Sánchez Julieta Sarai Becerra-Ruíz Lazar Yessayan Seyed Ali Mosaddad Artak Heboyan Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review BMC Oral Health Dental implants Survival rate Dental prosthesis Implant-supported Ameloblastoma |
| title | Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review |
| title_full | Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review |
| title_short | Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after Ameloblastomas treatment: a systematic review |
| title_sort | implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation after ameloblastomas treatment a systematic review |
| topic | Dental implants Survival rate Dental prosthesis Implant-supported Ameloblastoma |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03765-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marioalbertoalarconsanchez implantsupportedprostheticrehabilitationafterameloblastomastreatmentasystematicreview AT julietasaraibecerraruiz implantsupportedprostheticrehabilitationafterameloblastomastreatmentasystematicreview AT lazaryessayan implantsupportedprostheticrehabilitationafterameloblastomastreatmentasystematicreview AT seyedalimosaddad implantsupportedprostheticrehabilitationafterameloblastomastreatmentasystematicreview AT artakheboyan implantsupportedprostheticrehabilitationafterameloblastomastreatmentasystematicreview |