Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities

Employment agencies and funding systems commonly use distal outcome measures such as employed or not employed, full-time or part-time, and continuous measures such as wage, hours worked, and type of job to document the employment status of individuals with disabilities. These measures continue to de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Riesen, Corban Remund, Aubrey Snyder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.873568/full
_version_ 1797964764907831296
author Tim Riesen
Corban Remund
Aubrey Snyder
author_facet Tim Riesen
Corban Remund
Aubrey Snyder
author_sort Tim Riesen
collection DOAJ
description Employment agencies and funding systems commonly use distal outcome measures such as employed or not employed, full-time or part-time, and continuous measures such as wage, hours worked, and type of job to document the employment status of individuals with disabilities. These measures continue to demonstrate that individuals with disabilities fall behind individuals without disabilities in all employment outcomes. While there is utility in distal outcome measures, it is difficult to determine what intervention or program variables were responsible for a specific outcome. Moreover, outcome measures do not provide sufficient information about the quality of employment supports and services an individual with disabilities receives. One way to improve accountability in employment support programs is to link outcomes to specific processes for obtaining and maintaining employment. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe how employment programs can link short-term (proximal) and long term (distal) outcomes measures to specific processes for employment. A customized employment framework is used to illustrate how systematically linking outcomes and processes improves accountability in programs that support job seekers with most significant disabilities.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:50:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4ec318afc9548feb9443fa2b9146b74
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6861
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:50:08Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a4ec318afc9548feb9443fa2b9146b742023-01-03T06:51:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences2673-68612022-05-01310.3389/fresc.2022.873568873568Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant DisabilitiesTim RiesenCorban RemundAubrey SnyderEmployment agencies and funding systems commonly use distal outcome measures such as employed or not employed, full-time or part-time, and continuous measures such as wage, hours worked, and type of job to document the employment status of individuals with disabilities. These measures continue to demonstrate that individuals with disabilities fall behind individuals without disabilities in all employment outcomes. While there is utility in distal outcome measures, it is difficult to determine what intervention or program variables were responsible for a specific outcome. Moreover, outcome measures do not provide sufficient information about the quality of employment supports and services an individual with disabilities receives. One way to improve accountability in employment support programs is to link outcomes to specific processes for obtaining and maintaining employment. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe how employment programs can link short-term (proximal) and long term (distal) outcomes measures to specific processes for employment. A customized employment framework is used to illustrate how systematically linking outcomes and processes improves accountability in programs that support job seekers with most significant disabilities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.873568/fullcompetitive integrated employmentmost significant disabilitiesprocess measuresoutcome measuresaccountability
spellingShingle Tim Riesen
Corban Remund
Aubrey Snyder
Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
competitive integrated employment
most significant disabilities
process measures
outcome measures
accountability
title Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities
title_full Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities
title_fullStr Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities
title_short Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities
title_sort linking process and outcome measures to improve employment support programs for individuals with the most significant disabilities
topic competitive integrated employment
most significant disabilities
process measures
outcome measures
accountability
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.873568/full
work_keys_str_mv AT timriesen linkingprocessandoutcomemeasurestoimproveemploymentsupportprogramsforindividualswiththemostsignificantdisabilities
AT corbanremund linkingprocessandoutcomemeasurestoimproveemploymentsupportprogramsforindividualswiththemostsignificantdisabilities
AT aubreysnyder linkingprocessandoutcomemeasurestoimproveemploymentsupportprogramsforindividualswiththemostsignificantdisabilities