Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.

Quality of malting barley of given harvest is proved in RIBM, Plc., Malting Institute Brno, every year for a long time. There is comparison of results from 2000 and 2004 harvests, which were - every from different point of view - problematic, presented in the article. From the aspect of the harveste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Josef PROKEŠ
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Research Institute of Brewing and Malting, Plc. 2005-06-01
Series:Kvasný průmysl
Subjects:
Online Access:https://kvasnyprumysl.cz/en/artkey/kpr-200506-0002_Srovnani_jakosti_jarniho_jecmene_sklizne_roku_2000_a_2004.php
_version_ 1828930899849248768
author Josef PROKEŠ
author_facet Josef PROKEŠ
author_sort Josef PROKEŠ
collection DOAJ
description Quality of malting barley of given harvest is proved in RIBM, Plc., Malting Institute Brno, every year for a long time. There is comparison of results from 2000 and 2004 harvests, which were - every from different point of view - problematic, presented in the article. From the aspect of the harvested amount, average yield and barley technological quality, the harvest 2000 was evaluated as the worst harvest over last 40 years. Harvest 2004 was outstanding in terms of production and average hectare yield, unfortunately the technological quality of the harvested barley was problematic or even unsatisfactory, especially because of low protein content. Quality of barley harvest of the years 2000 and 2004 shows how strong the effect of the year on the barley quality was. The article demonstrates the effect of protein content on the barley quality and properties, malt yield and costs of kilning. According to the achieved technological conditions, calculation and comparison of water amount that is necessary to evaporate from green malt are presented. In addition the article presents relations among the malt parameters - extract, proteins, soluble nitrogen and Kolbach index and degree of their mutual interaction. Separately in the table quality of barley, malt and amount of the beer produced for the harvest 2000 and 2004 are compared. It is proved that input quality of malting barley explicitly affects malt production and significantly influences beer production and qualityQuality of malting barley of given harvest is proved in RIBM, Plc., Malting Institute Brno, every year for a long time. There is comparison of results from 2000 and 2004 harvests, which were - every from different point of view - problematic, presented in the article. From the aspect of the harvested amount, average yield and barley technological quality, the harvest 2000 was evaluated as the worst harvest over last 40 years. Harvest 2004 was outstanding in terms of production and average hectare yield, unfortunately the technological quality of the harvested barley was problematic or even unsatisfactory, especially because of low protein content. Quality of barley harvest of the years 2000 and 2004 shows how strong the effect of the year on the barley quality was. The article demonstrates the effect of protein content on the barley quality and properties, malt yield and costs of kilning. According to the achieved technological conditions, calculation and comparison of water amount that is necessary to evaporate from green malt are presented. In addition the article presents relations among the malt parameters - extract, proteins, soluble nitrogen and Kolbach index and degree of their mutual interaction. Separately in the table quality of barley, malt and amount of the beer produced for the harvest 2000 and 2004 are compared. It is proved that input quality of malting barley explicitly affects malt production and significantly influences beer production and quality
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:38:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a4ee1f8d2ef345acb588bde03c067c0d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0023-5830
2570-8619
language ces
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:38:47Z
publishDate 2005-06-01
publisher Research Institute of Brewing and Malting, Plc.
record_format Article
series Kvasný průmysl
spelling doaj.art-a4ee1f8d2ef345acb588bde03c067c0d2022-12-21T23:24:29ZcesResearch Institute of Brewing and Malting, Plc.Kvasný průmysl0023-58302570-86192005-06-0151619520110.18832/kp2005011kpr-200506-0002Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.Josef PROKEŠ0VÚPS Praha, a.s., Sladařský ústavQuality of malting barley of given harvest is proved in RIBM, Plc., Malting Institute Brno, every year for a long time. There is comparison of results from 2000 and 2004 harvests, which were - every from different point of view - problematic, presented in the article. From the aspect of the harvested amount, average yield and barley technological quality, the harvest 2000 was evaluated as the worst harvest over last 40 years. Harvest 2004 was outstanding in terms of production and average hectare yield, unfortunately the technological quality of the harvested barley was problematic or even unsatisfactory, especially because of low protein content. Quality of barley harvest of the years 2000 and 2004 shows how strong the effect of the year on the barley quality was. The article demonstrates the effect of protein content on the barley quality and properties, malt yield and costs of kilning. According to the achieved technological conditions, calculation and comparison of water amount that is necessary to evaporate from green malt are presented. In addition the article presents relations among the malt parameters - extract, proteins, soluble nitrogen and Kolbach index and degree of their mutual interaction. Separately in the table quality of barley, malt and amount of the beer produced for the harvest 2000 and 2004 are compared. It is proved that input quality of malting barley explicitly affects malt production and significantly influences beer production and qualityQuality of malting barley of given harvest is proved in RIBM, Plc., Malting Institute Brno, every year for a long time. There is comparison of results from 2000 and 2004 harvests, which were - every from different point of view - problematic, presented in the article. From the aspect of the harvested amount, average yield and barley technological quality, the harvest 2000 was evaluated as the worst harvest over last 40 years. Harvest 2004 was outstanding in terms of production and average hectare yield, unfortunately the technological quality of the harvested barley was problematic or even unsatisfactory, especially because of low protein content. Quality of barley harvest of the years 2000 and 2004 shows how strong the effect of the year on the barley quality was. The article demonstrates the effect of protein content on the barley quality and properties, malt yield and costs of kilning. According to the achieved technological conditions, calculation and comparison of water amount that is necessary to evaporate from green malt are presented. In addition the article presents relations among the malt parameters - extract, proteins, soluble nitrogen and Kolbach index and degree of their mutual interaction. Separately in the table quality of barley, malt and amount of the beer produced for the harvest 2000 and 2004 are compared. It is proved that input quality of malting barley explicitly affects malt production and significantly influences beer production and qualityhttps://kvasnyprumysl.cz/en/artkey/kpr-200506-0002_Srovnani_jakosti_jarniho_jecmene_sklizne_roku_2000_a_2004.phpbarleymaltbeerharvestquality
spellingShingle Josef PROKEŠ
Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.
Kvasný průmysl
barley
malt
beer
harvest
quality
title Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.
title_full Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.
title_fullStr Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.
title_short Comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004.
title_sort comparison of spring barley quality from harvest 2000 and harvest 2004
topic barley
malt
beer
harvest
quality
url https://kvasnyprumysl.cz/en/artkey/kpr-200506-0002_Srovnani_jakosti_jarniho_jecmene_sklizne_roku_2000_a_2004.php
work_keys_str_mv AT josefprokes comparisonofspringbarleyqualityfromharvest2000andharvest2004