Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate

Background: During HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS) 2017 round, the sampling strategy to recruit female sex workers (FSWs) was changed from consecutive to random sampling. This may affect the participation and HIV positivity rates among FSWs. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shashi Kant, Ayush Lohiya, Sanjay Kumar Rai, Puneet Misra, S Venkatesh, Research TeamFNx01
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2020;volume=64;issue=3;spage=248;epage=251;aulast=Kant
_version_ 1819038186163142656
author Shashi Kant
Ayush Lohiya
Sanjay Kumar Rai
Puneet Misra
S Venkatesh
Research TeamFNx01
author_facet Shashi Kant
Ayush Lohiya
Sanjay Kumar Rai
Puneet Misra
S Venkatesh
Research TeamFNx01
author_sort Shashi Kant
collection DOAJ
description Background: During HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS) 2017 round, the sampling strategy to recruit female sex workers (FSWs) was changed from consecutive to random sampling. This may affect the participation and HIV positivity rates among FSWs. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the nonparticipation rates among FSWs and its effect on the observed HIV prevalence rate during HSS-2017. Methods: The data were collected from FSW sentinel sites located in the states of Delhi, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand (Central Zone). The HIV positivity rate among FSWs who participated in HSS-2017 was compared with the HIV positivity rate of those who did not participate. HIV status of the participants was obtained from HSS-2017 data. The master list of participating targeted intervention sites was accessed to obtain the last known HIV status of the eligible nonparticipants. Results: Nonparticipation rate of FSWs from the central zone during HSS2017 was 10.8%. The HIV positivity rate among nonparticipant FSW was four times and six times higher in Delhi and UP, respectively. Conclusion: Selective nonparticipation of eligible FSWs might have led to the underestimation of the HIV positivity rate in the central zone during the HSS-2017 round.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:33:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a50fe2f2f821409c878c1af919e7adb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-557X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:33:18Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-a50fe2f2f821409c878c1af919e7adb72022-12-21T19:10:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Public Health0019-557X2020-01-0164324825110.4103/ijph.IJPH_219_19Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rateShashi KantAyush LohiyaSanjay Kumar RaiPuneet MisraS VenkateshResearch TeamFNx01Background: During HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS) 2017 round, the sampling strategy to recruit female sex workers (FSWs) was changed from consecutive to random sampling. This may affect the participation and HIV positivity rates among FSWs. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the nonparticipation rates among FSWs and its effect on the observed HIV prevalence rate during HSS-2017. Methods: The data were collected from FSW sentinel sites located in the states of Delhi, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand (Central Zone). The HIV positivity rate among FSWs who participated in HSS-2017 was compared with the HIV positivity rate of those who did not participate. HIV status of the participants was obtained from HSS-2017 data. The master list of participating targeted intervention sites was accessed to obtain the last known HIV status of the eligible nonparticipants. Results: Nonparticipation rate of FSWs from the central zone during HSS2017 was 10.8%. The HIV positivity rate among nonparticipant FSW was four times and six times higher in Delhi and UP, respectively. Conclusion: Selective nonparticipation of eligible FSWs might have led to the underestimation of the HIV positivity rate in the central zone during the HSS-2017 round.http://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2020;volume=64;issue=3;spage=248;epage=251;aulast=Kantfemale sex workershiv sentinel surveillancehiv
spellingShingle Shashi Kant
Ayush Lohiya
Sanjay Kumar Rai
Puneet Misra
S Venkatesh
Research TeamFNx01
Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
Indian Journal of Public Health
female sex workers
hiv sentinel surveillance
hiv
title Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
title_full Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
title_fullStr Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
title_full_unstemmed Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
title_short Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
title_sort non participation of female sex workers in hiv sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone and its effect on observed hiv prevalence rate
topic female sex workers
hiv sentinel surveillance
hiv
url http://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2020;volume=64;issue=3;spage=248;epage=251;aulast=Kant
work_keys_str_mv AT shashikant nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate
AT ayushlohiya nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate
AT sanjaykumarrai nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate
AT puneetmisra nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate
AT svenkatesh nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate
AT researchteamfnx01 nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate