Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate
Background: During HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS) 2017 round, the sampling strategy to recruit female sex workers (FSWs) was changed from consecutive to random sampling. This may affect the participation and HIV positivity rates among FSWs. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2020;volume=64;issue=3;spage=248;epage=251;aulast=Kant |
_version_ | 1819038186163142656 |
---|---|
author | Shashi Kant Ayush Lohiya Sanjay Kumar Rai Puneet Misra S Venkatesh Research TeamFNx01 |
author_facet | Shashi Kant Ayush Lohiya Sanjay Kumar Rai Puneet Misra S Venkatesh Research TeamFNx01 |
author_sort | Shashi Kant |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: During HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS) 2017 round, the sampling strategy to recruit female sex workers (FSWs) was changed from consecutive to random sampling. This may affect the participation and HIV positivity rates among FSWs. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the nonparticipation rates among FSWs and its effect on the observed HIV prevalence rate during HSS-2017. Methods: The data were collected from FSW sentinel sites located in the states of Delhi, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand (Central Zone). The HIV positivity rate among FSWs who participated in HSS-2017 was compared with the HIV positivity rate of those who did not participate. HIV status of the participants was obtained from HSS-2017 data. The master list of participating targeted intervention sites was accessed to obtain the last known HIV status of the eligible nonparticipants. Results: Nonparticipation rate of FSWs from the central zone during HSS2017 was 10.8%. The HIV positivity rate among nonparticipant FSW was four times and six times higher in Delhi and UP, respectively. Conclusion: Selective nonparticipation of eligible FSWs might have led to the underestimation of the HIV positivity rate in the central zone during the HSS-2017 round. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T08:33:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a50fe2f2f821409c878c1af919e7adb7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0019-557X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T08:33:18Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Public Health |
spelling | doaj.art-a50fe2f2f821409c878c1af919e7adb72022-12-21T19:10:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Public Health0019-557X2020-01-0164324825110.4103/ijph.IJPH_219_19Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rateShashi KantAyush LohiyaSanjay Kumar RaiPuneet MisraS VenkateshResearch TeamFNx01Background: During HIV sentinel surveillance (HSS) 2017 round, the sampling strategy to recruit female sex workers (FSWs) was changed from consecutive to random sampling. This may affect the participation and HIV positivity rates among FSWs. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the nonparticipation rates among FSWs and its effect on the observed HIV prevalence rate during HSS-2017. Methods: The data were collected from FSW sentinel sites located in the states of Delhi, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand (Central Zone). The HIV positivity rate among FSWs who participated in HSS-2017 was compared with the HIV positivity rate of those who did not participate. HIV status of the participants was obtained from HSS-2017 data. The master list of participating targeted intervention sites was accessed to obtain the last known HIV status of the eligible nonparticipants. Results: Nonparticipation rate of FSWs from the central zone during HSS2017 was 10.8%. The HIV positivity rate among nonparticipant FSW was four times and six times higher in Delhi and UP, respectively. Conclusion: Selective nonparticipation of eligible FSWs might have led to the underestimation of the HIV positivity rate in the central zone during the HSS-2017 round.http://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2020;volume=64;issue=3;spage=248;epage=251;aulast=Kantfemale sex workershiv sentinel surveillancehiv |
spellingShingle | Shashi Kant Ayush Lohiya Sanjay Kumar Rai Puneet Misra S Venkatesh Research TeamFNx01 Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate Indian Journal of Public Health female sex workers hiv sentinel surveillance hiv |
title | Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate |
title_full | Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate |
title_fullStr | Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate |
title_short | Non-participation of female sex workers in HIV sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone, and its effect on observed HIV prevalence rate |
title_sort | non participation of female sex workers in hiv sentinel surveillance 2017 in the central zone and its effect on observed hiv prevalence rate |
topic | female sex workers hiv sentinel surveillance hiv |
url | http://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2020;volume=64;issue=3;spage=248;epage=251;aulast=Kant |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shashikant nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate AT ayushlohiya nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate AT sanjaykumarrai nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate AT puneetmisra nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate AT svenkatesh nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate AT researchteamfnx01 nonparticipationoffemalesexworkersinhivsentinelsurveillance2017inthecentralzoneanditseffectonobservedhivprevalencerate |