A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure
Abstract Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of total joint arthroplasty, typically necessitating surgical intervention and prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Currently, there is no perfect assay for PJI diagnosis. Proteomic profiling of sonicate fluid has the potential to dif...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20444-9 |
_version_ | 1797859971175546880 |
---|---|
author | Cody R. Fisher Harold I. Salmons Jay Mandrekar Kerryl E. Greenwood-Quaintance Matthew P. Abdel Robin Patel |
author_facet | Cody R. Fisher Harold I. Salmons Jay Mandrekar Kerryl E. Greenwood-Quaintance Matthew P. Abdel Robin Patel |
author_sort | Cody R. Fisher |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of total joint arthroplasty, typically necessitating surgical intervention and prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Currently, there is no perfect assay for PJI diagnosis. Proteomic profiling of sonicate fluid has the potential to differentiate PJI from non-infectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF) and possibly clinical subsets of PJI and/or NIAF. In this study, 200 sonicate fluid samples, including 90 from subjects with NIAF (23 aseptic loosening, 35 instability, 10 stiffness, five osteolysis, and 17 other) and 110 from subjects with PJI (40 Staphylococcus aureus, 40 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 10 Staphylococcus lugdunensis, 10 Streptococcus agalactiae, and 10 Enterococcus faecalis) were analyzed by proximity extension assay using the 92 protein Inflammation Panel from Olink Proteomics. Thirty-seven of the 92 proteins examined, including CCL20, OSM, EN-RAGE, IL8, and IL6, were differentially expressed in PJI versus NIAF sonicate fluid samples, with none of the 92 proteins differentially expressed between staphylococcal versus non-staphylococcal PJI, nor between the different types of NIAF studied. IL-17A and CCL11 were differentially expressed between PJI caused by different bacterial species, with IL-17A detected at higher levels in S. aureus compared to S. epidermidis and S. lugdunensis PJI, and CCL11 detected at higher levels in S. epidermidis compared to S. aureus and S. agalactiae PJI. Receiver operative characteristic curve analysis identified individual proteins and combinations of proteins that could differentiate PJI from NIAF. Overall, proteomic profiling using this small protein panel was able to differentiate between PJI and NIAF sonicate samples and provide a better understanding of the immune response during arthroplasty failure. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T21:39:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a511b55c6d454625a550a81a2c5f1112 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T21:39:18Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-a511b55c6d454625a550a81a2c5f11122023-03-26T11:08:44ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-09-0112111110.1038/s41598-022-20444-9A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failureCody R. Fisher0Harold I. Salmons1Jay Mandrekar2Kerryl E. Greenwood-Quaintance3Matthew P. Abdel4Robin Patel5Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo ClinicDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo ClinicDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicAbstract Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of total joint arthroplasty, typically necessitating surgical intervention and prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Currently, there is no perfect assay for PJI diagnosis. Proteomic profiling of sonicate fluid has the potential to differentiate PJI from non-infectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF) and possibly clinical subsets of PJI and/or NIAF. In this study, 200 sonicate fluid samples, including 90 from subjects with NIAF (23 aseptic loosening, 35 instability, 10 stiffness, five osteolysis, and 17 other) and 110 from subjects with PJI (40 Staphylococcus aureus, 40 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 10 Staphylococcus lugdunensis, 10 Streptococcus agalactiae, and 10 Enterococcus faecalis) were analyzed by proximity extension assay using the 92 protein Inflammation Panel from Olink Proteomics. Thirty-seven of the 92 proteins examined, including CCL20, OSM, EN-RAGE, IL8, and IL6, were differentially expressed in PJI versus NIAF sonicate fluid samples, with none of the 92 proteins differentially expressed between staphylococcal versus non-staphylococcal PJI, nor between the different types of NIAF studied. IL-17A and CCL11 were differentially expressed between PJI caused by different bacterial species, with IL-17A detected at higher levels in S. aureus compared to S. epidermidis and S. lugdunensis PJI, and CCL11 detected at higher levels in S. epidermidis compared to S. aureus and S. agalactiae PJI. Receiver operative characteristic curve analysis identified individual proteins and combinations of proteins that could differentiate PJI from NIAF. Overall, proteomic profiling using this small protein panel was able to differentiate between PJI and NIAF sonicate samples and provide a better understanding of the immune response during arthroplasty failure.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20444-9 |
spellingShingle | Cody R. Fisher Harold I. Salmons Jay Mandrekar Kerryl E. Greenwood-Quaintance Matthew P. Abdel Robin Patel A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure Scientific Reports |
title | A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure |
title_full | A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure |
title_fullStr | A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure |
title_full_unstemmed | A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure |
title_short | A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure |
title_sort | 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non infectious causes of arthroplasty failure |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20444-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT codyrfisher a92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT haroldisalmons a92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT jaymandrekar a92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT kerrylegreenwoodquaintance a92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT matthewpabdel a92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT robinpatel a92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT codyrfisher 92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT haroldisalmons 92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT jaymandrekar 92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT kerrylegreenwoodquaintance 92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT matthewpabdel 92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure AT robinpatel 92proteininflammationpanelperformedonsonicatefluiddifferentiatesperiprostheticjointinfectionfromnoninfectiouscausesofarthroplastyfailure |