Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness

This study compared the three wastewater pretreatments of ozonation, Fe2+-S2O82− and freeze-thawing (F/T) in the disintegration, anaerobic digestion (AD) and final disposal of the sludge. The F/T pretreatment increased the dewaterability and settleability of the sludge by 7.8% and 47.1%, respectivel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haiyang He, Xiaodong Xin, Wei Qiu, Dong Li, Zhicen Liu, Jun Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-10-01
Series:Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498421000569
_version_ 1819319212298993664
author Haiyang He
Xiaodong Xin
Wei Qiu
Dong Li
Zhicen Liu
Jun Ma
author_facet Haiyang He
Xiaodong Xin
Wei Qiu
Dong Li
Zhicen Liu
Jun Ma
author_sort Haiyang He
collection DOAJ
description This study compared the three wastewater pretreatments of ozonation, Fe2+-S2O82− and freeze-thawing (F/T) in the disintegration, anaerobic digestion (AD) and final disposal of the sludge. The F/T pretreatment increased the dewaterability and settleability of the sludge by 7.8% and 47.1%, respectively. The ozonation pretreatment formed more volatile fatty acids (VFAs), with a peak value of 320.82 mg SCOD/L and controlled the release of sulfides. The Fe2+-S2O82− pretreatment removed heavy metals through the absorption and flocculation of ferric particles formed in-situ. During the anaerobic digestion of the sludge, the ozonation pretreatment accelerated the hydrolysis rate (k) rather than the biochemical methane potential (B0) of the sludge due to the high VFA content in the supernatant. Comparatively, the F/T pretreatment facilitated the B0 with great economic efficiency by enhancing the solubilisation of the sludge. Although Fe2+-S2O82− pretreatment decreased the methane production, the ferric particle was a unique advantage in the disintegration and harmless disposal of the sludge. The digested sludge had more VFAs after ozonation pretreatment, which contributed to the recycling of carbon. In addition, the lower sludge volume could save the expense of transportation and disposal by ozonation pretreatment. Different pretreatments had different characteristics. The comparative study provided information allowing the selection of the type of pretreatment to achieve different objectives of the treatment and disposal of sludge.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T11:00:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5141de480a74c6ea1fd6dd679e32d72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-4984
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T11:00:06Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
spelling doaj.art-a5141de480a74c6ea1fd6dd679e32d722022-12-21T16:58:44ZengElsevierEnvironmental Science and Ecotechnology2666-49842021-10-018100132Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectivenessHaiyang He0Xiaodong Xin1Wei Qiu2Dong Li3Zhicen Liu4Jun Ma5State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, ChinaDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, 361021, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China; Corresponding author.Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, ChinaSchool of Geosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JU, UKState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China; Corresponding author.This study compared the three wastewater pretreatments of ozonation, Fe2+-S2O82− and freeze-thawing (F/T) in the disintegration, anaerobic digestion (AD) and final disposal of the sludge. The F/T pretreatment increased the dewaterability and settleability of the sludge by 7.8% and 47.1%, respectively. The ozonation pretreatment formed more volatile fatty acids (VFAs), with a peak value of 320.82 mg SCOD/L and controlled the release of sulfides. The Fe2+-S2O82− pretreatment removed heavy metals through the absorption and flocculation of ferric particles formed in-situ. During the anaerobic digestion of the sludge, the ozonation pretreatment accelerated the hydrolysis rate (k) rather than the biochemical methane potential (B0) of the sludge due to the high VFA content in the supernatant. Comparatively, the F/T pretreatment facilitated the B0 with great economic efficiency by enhancing the solubilisation of the sludge. Although Fe2+-S2O82− pretreatment decreased the methane production, the ferric particle was a unique advantage in the disintegration and harmless disposal of the sludge. The digested sludge had more VFAs after ozonation pretreatment, which contributed to the recycling of carbon. In addition, the lower sludge volume could save the expense of transportation and disposal by ozonation pretreatment. Different pretreatments had different characteristics. The comparative study provided information allowing the selection of the type of pretreatment to achieve different objectives of the treatment and disposal of sludge.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498421000569Sludge disintegrationAnaerobic sludge digestionEffectiveness comparisonDifferent pretreatments
spellingShingle Haiyang He
Xiaodong Xin
Wei Qiu
Dong Li
Zhicen Liu
Jun Ma
Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
Sludge disintegration
Anaerobic sludge digestion
Effectiveness comparison
Different pretreatments
title Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness
title_full Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness
title_fullStr Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness
title_short Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness
title_sort waste sludge disintegration methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments comparison of performance and effectiveness
topic Sludge disintegration
Anaerobic sludge digestion
Effectiveness comparison
Different pretreatments
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498421000569
work_keys_str_mv AT haiyanghe wastesludgedisintegrationmethanogenesisandfinaldisposalviavariouspretreatmentscomparisonofperformanceandeffectiveness
AT xiaodongxin wastesludgedisintegrationmethanogenesisandfinaldisposalviavariouspretreatmentscomparisonofperformanceandeffectiveness
AT weiqiu wastesludgedisintegrationmethanogenesisandfinaldisposalviavariouspretreatmentscomparisonofperformanceandeffectiveness
AT dongli wastesludgedisintegrationmethanogenesisandfinaldisposalviavariouspretreatmentscomparisonofperformanceandeffectiveness
AT zhicenliu wastesludgedisintegrationmethanogenesisandfinaldisposalviavariouspretreatmentscomparisonofperformanceandeffectiveness
AT junma wastesludgedisintegrationmethanogenesisandfinaldisposalviavariouspretreatmentscomparisonofperformanceandeffectiveness