Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants

The study evaluates the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation using promontory velocity and ear canal pressure, as less invasive alternatives to intracochlear pressure. Stimulating with a percutaneous bone conduction device implanted in six human cadaveric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irina Wils, Alexander Geerardyn, Tristan Putzeys, Guy Fierens, Kathleen Denis, Nicolas Verhaert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1324971/full
_version_ 1797263076374872064
author Irina Wils
Alexander Geerardyn
Alexander Geerardyn
Tristan Putzeys
Tristan Putzeys
Guy Fierens
Guy Fierens
Guy Fierens
Kathleen Denis
Nicolas Verhaert
Nicolas Verhaert
author_facet Irina Wils
Alexander Geerardyn
Alexander Geerardyn
Tristan Putzeys
Tristan Putzeys
Guy Fierens
Guy Fierens
Guy Fierens
Kathleen Denis
Nicolas Verhaert
Nicolas Verhaert
author_sort Irina Wils
collection DOAJ
description The study evaluates the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation using promontory velocity and ear canal pressure, as less invasive alternatives to intracochlear pressure. Stimulating with a percutaneous bone conduction device implanted in six human cadaveric ears, measurements were taken across various intensities, frequencies, and stimulation positions. Results indicate that intracochlear pressure linearly correlates with ear canal pressure (R2 = 0.43, RMSE = 6.85 dB), and promontory velocity (R2 = 0.47, RMSE = 6.60 dB). Normalizing data to mitigate the influence of stimulation position leads to a substantial improvement in these correlations. R2 values increased substantially to 0.93 for both the ear canal pressure and the promontory velocity, with RMSE reduced considerably to 2.02 (for ear canal pressure) and 1.94 dB (for promontory velocity). Conclusively, both ear canal pressure and promontory velocity showed potential in predicting intracochlear pressure and the prediction accuracy notably enhanced when accounting for stimulation position. Ultimately, these findings advocate for the continued use of intracochlear pressure measurements to evaluate future bone conduction devices and illuminate the role of stimulation position in influencing the dynamics of bone conduction pathways.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:07:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a52494597d434a45b1a3265f829e138a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:07:15Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-a52494597d434a45b1a3265f829e138a2024-03-14T04:30:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2024-03-011810.3389/fnins.2024.13249711324971Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implantsIrina Wils0Alexander Geerardyn1Alexander Geerardyn2Tristan Putzeys3Tristan Putzeys4Guy Fierens5Guy Fierens6Guy Fierens7Kathleen Denis8Nicolas Verhaert9Nicolas Verhaert10Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumCochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, BelgiumBiomechanics Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumThe study evaluates the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation using promontory velocity and ear canal pressure, as less invasive alternatives to intracochlear pressure. Stimulating with a percutaneous bone conduction device implanted in six human cadaveric ears, measurements were taken across various intensities, frequencies, and stimulation positions. Results indicate that intracochlear pressure linearly correlates with ear canal pressure (R2 = 0.43, RMSE = 6.85 dB), and promontory velocity (R2 = 0.47, RMSE = 6.60 dB). Normalizing data to mitigate the influence of stimulation position leads to a substantial improvement in these correlations. R2 values increased substantially to 0.93 for both the ear canal pressure and the promontory velocity, with RMSE reduced considerably to 2.02 (for ear canal pressure) and 1.94 dB (for promontory velocity). Conclusively, both ear canal pressure and promontory velocity showed potential in predicting intracochlear pressure and the prediction accuracy notably enhanced when accounting for stimulation position. Ultimately, these findings advocate for the continued use of intracochlear pressure measurements to evaluate future bone conduction devices and illuminate the role of stimulation position in influencing the dynamics of bone conduction pathways.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1324971/fullbone conductionintracochlear pressurepromontory velocityear canal pressureobjective measures
spellingShingle Irina Wils
Alexander Geerardyn
Alexander Geerardyn
Tristan Putzeys
Tristan Putzeys
Guy Fierens
Guy Fierens
Guy Fierens
Kathleen Denis
Nicolas Verhaert
Nicolas Verhaert
Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
Frontiers in Neuroscience
bone conduction
intracochlear pressure
promontory velocity
ear canal pressure
objective measures
title Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
title_full Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
title_fullStr Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
title_full_unstemmed Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
title_short Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
title_sort objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants
topic bone conduction
intracochlear pressure
promontory velocity
ear canal pressure
objective measures
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1324971/full
work_keys_str_mv AT irinawils objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT alexandergeerardyn objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT alexandergeerardyn objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT tristanputzeys objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT tristanputzeys objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT guyfierens objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT guyfierens objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT guyfierens objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT kathleendenis objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT nicolasverhaert objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants
AT nicolasverhaert objectivepreclinicalmeasuresforboneconductionimplants