Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
Abstract Urban landscapes combining trees and crops—urban agroforestry (UAF) systems—may offer greater ecological and cultural benefits than annual cropping systems. Interest in UAF is growing, as evidenced by an increasing number of built projects and articles in the popular press and the academic...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20016 |
_version_ | 1798033658495369216 |
---|---|
author | John R. Taylor Sarah Taylor Lovell |
author_facet | John R. Taylor Sarah Taylor Lovell |
author_sort | John R. Taylor |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Urban landscapes combining trees and crops—urban agroforestry (UAF) systems—may offer greater ecological and cultural benefits than annual cropping systems. Interest in UAF is growing, as evidenced by an increasing number of built projects and articles in the popular press and the academic literature on the subject. However, the practice of UAF appears to far outpace research on its scientific underpinnings or its design. Developing sustainable, resilient UAF sites can be challenging because of biophysical and sociocultural conditions unique to the city; however, cities offer opportunities not found in rural environments including the potential to close open nutrient loops between consumers and sites of food production. We argue that these biophysical and sociocultural challenges and opportunities can be best addressed through an evidence‐based approach to the design of UAF systems and a complex ecological aesthetic design language integrating theory, principles, and practices from urban agroecology and allied fields, environmental psychology, and landscape architecture. The resulting multifunctional UAF systems would be socially sustainable and equitable and promote the circular metabolism of the city. Drawing on a purposive review of literature from these disciplines, we propose a preliminary framework consisting of 14 guidelines and complementary principles and strategies for the design of multifunctional, culturally preferred UAF and offer recommendations for future research. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:32:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a53443727ba242bda4ca9d45d7a36a18 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2575-1220 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:32:37Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems |
spelling | doaj.art-a53443727ba242bda4ca9d45d7a36a182022-12-22T04:04:27ZengWileyUrban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems2575-12202021-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/uar2.20016Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mindJohn R. Taylor0Sarah Taylor Lovell1Department of Plant Sciences and Entomology University of Rhode Island Kingston RI 02881 USACenter for Agroforestry University of Missouri–Columbia Columbia MO 65211 USAAbstract Urban landscapes combining trees and crops—urban agroforestry (UAF) systems—may offer greater ecological and cultural benefits than annual cropping systems. Interest in UAF is growing, as evidenced by an increasing number of built projects and articles in the popular press and the academic literature on the subject. However, the practice of UAF appears to far outpace research on its scientific underpinnings or its design. Developing sustainable, resilient UAF sites can be challenging because of biophysical and sociocultural conditions unique to the city; however, cities offer opportunities not found in rural environments including the potential to close open nutrient loops between consumers and sites of food production. We argue that these biophysical and sociocultural challenges and opportunities can be best addressed through an evidence‐based approach to the design of UAF systems and a complex ecological aesthetic design language integrating theory, principles, and practices from urban agroecology and allied fields, environmental psychology, and landscape architecture. The resulting multifunctional UAF systems would be socially sustainable and equitable and promote the circular metabolism of the city. Drawing on a purposive review of literature from these disciplines, we propose a preliminary framework consisting of 14 guidelines and complementary principles and strategies for the design of multifunctional, culturally preferred UAF and offer recommendations for future research.https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20016 |
spellingShingle | John R. Taylor Sarah Taylor Lovell Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems |
title | Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind |
title_full | Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind |
title_fullStr | Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind |
title_full_unstemmed | Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind |
title_short | Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind |
title_sort | designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnrtaylor designingmultifunctionalurbanagroforestrywithpeopleinmind AT sarahtaylorlovell designingmultifunctionalurbanagroforestrywithpeopleinmind |