Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind

Abstract Urban landscapes combining trees and crops—urban agroforestry (UAF) systems—may offer greater ecological and cultural benefits than annual cropping systems. Interest in UAF is growing, as evidenced by an increasing number of built projects and articles in the popular press and the academic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John R. Taylor, Sarah Taylor Lovell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20016
_version_ 1798033658495369216
author John R. Taylor
Sarah Taylor Lovell
author_facet John R. Taylor
Sarah Taylor Lovell
author_sort John R. Taylor
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Urban landscapes combining trees and crops—urban agroforestry (UAF) systems—may offer greater ecological and cultural benefits than annual cropping systems. Interest in UAF is growing, as evidenced by an increasing number of built projects and articles in the popular press and the academic literature on the subject. However, the practice of UAF appears to far outpace research on its scientific underpinnings or its design. Developing sustainable, resilient UAF sites can be challenging because of biophysical and sociocultural conditions unique to the city; however, cities offer opportunities not found in rural environments including the potential to close open nutrient loops between consumers and sites of food production. We argue that these biophysical and sociocultural challenges and opportunities can be best addressed through an evidence‐based approach to the design of UAF systems and a complex ecological aesthetic design language integrating theory, principles, and practices from urban agroecology and allied fields, environmental psychology, and landscape architecture. The resulting multifunctional UAF systems would be socially sustainable and equitable and promote the circular metabolism of the city. Drawing on a purposive review of literature from these disciplines, we propose a preliminary framework consisting of 14 guidelines and complementary principles and strategies for the design of multifunctional, culturally preferred UAF and offer recommendations for future research.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:32:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a53443727ba242bda4ca9d45d7a36a18
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2575-1220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:32:37Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems
spelling doaj.art-a53443727ba242bda4ca9d45d7a36a182022-12-22T04:04:27ZengWileyUrban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems2575-12202021-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/uar2.20016Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mindJohn R. Taylor0Sarah Taylor Lovell1Department of Plant Sciences and Entomology University of Rhode Island Kingston RI 02881 USACenter for Agroforestry University of Missouri–Columbia Columbia MO 65211 USAAbstract Urban landscapes combining trees and crops—urban agroforestry (UAF) systems—may offer greater ecological and cultural benefits than annual cropping systems. Interest in UAF is growing, as evidenced by an increasing number of built projects and articles in the popular press and the academic literature on the subject. However, the practice of UAF appears to far outpace research on its scientific underpinnings or its design. Developing sustainable, resilient UAF sites can be challenging because of biophysical and sociocultural conditions unique to the city; however, cities offer opportunities not found in rural environments including the potential to close open nutrient loops between consumers and sites of food production. We argue that these biophysical and sociocultural challenges and opportunities can be best addressed through an evidence‐based approach to the design of UAF systems and a complex ecological aesthetic design language integrating theory, principles, and practices from urban agroecology and allied fields, environmental psychology, and landscape architecture. The resulting multifunctional UAF systems would be socially sustainable and equitable and promote the circular metabolism of the city. Drawing on a purposive review of literature from these disciplines, we propose a preliminary framework consisting of 14 guidelines and complementary principles and strategies for the design of multifunctional, culturally preferred UAF and offer recommendations for future research.https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20016
spellingShingle John R. Taylor
Sarah Taylor Lovell
Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems
title Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
title_full Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
title_fullStr Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
title_full_unstemmed Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
title_short Designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
title_sort designing multifunctional urban agroforestry with people in mind
url https://doi.org/10.1002/uar2.20016
work_keys_str_mv AT johnrtaylor designingmultifunctionalurbanagroforestrywithpeopleinmind
AT sarahtaylorlovell designingmultifunctionalurbanagroforestrywithpeopleinmind