Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease

Abstract Current treatment of severe dry eye disease (DED) includes blood-derived eye drops, such as autologous serum (AS), which lubricate the eyes and provide factors that improve ocular surface and aid in wound healing. Recent studies indicated that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was also effective....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chanatip Metheetrairut, Panotsom Ngowyutagon, Abhirak Tunganuntarat, Ladawan Khowawisetsut, Kulvara Kittisares, Pinnita Prabhasawat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12879-x
_version_ 1818204635174797312
author Chanatip Metheetrairut
Panotsom Ngowyutagon
Abhirak Tunganuntarat
Ladawan Khowawisetsut
Kulvara Kittisares
Pinnita Prabhasawat
author_facet Chanatip Metheetrairut
Panotsom Ngowyutagon
Abhirak Tunganuntarat
Ladawan Khowawisetsut
Kulvara Kittisares
Pinnita Prabhasawat
author_sort Chanatip Metheetrairut
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Current treatment of severe dry eye disease (DED) includes blood-derived eye drops, such as autologous serum (AS), which lubricate the eyes and provide factors that improve ocular surface and aid in wound healing. Recent studies indicated that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was also effective. This study aims to compare the concentration and stability of epitheliotrophic factors in AS and PRP and their efficacy in DED patients. Epitheliotrophic factors of interest are epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibronectin, platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB), and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1). We determined that all epitheliotrophic factors were present in AS and PRP at baseline and did not decrease in concentrations in all storage conditions (4 °C for 1 week and at − 20 °C for 1 and 3 months). However, differences in concentrations in AS and PRP were observed. PRP was also shown not to be inferior to AS in terms of efficacy in DED treatment in a prospective randomized control trial which evaluated ocular surface disease index, dry eye questionnaire, ocular surface staining, tear breakup time, and Schirmer test at baseline and at 1-month follow-up. Therefore, with its shorter preparation time, PRP could be considered as an alternative to AS for the treatment of DED.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:44:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a546e3b8edb84534a1aee8ff94caa536
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:44:22Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-a546e3b8edb84534a1aee8ff94caa5362022-12-22T00:39:36ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-05-011211910.1038/s41598-022-12879-xComparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye diseaseChanatip Metheetrairut0Panotsom Ngowyutagon1Abhirak Tunganuntarat2Ladawan Khowawisetsut3Kulvara Kittisares4Pinnita Prabhasawat5Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityAbstract Current treatment of severe dry eye disease (DED) includes blood-derived eye drops, such as autologous serum (AS), which lubricate the eyes and provide factors that improve ocular surface and aid in wound healing. Recent studies indicated that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was also effective. This study aims to compare the concentration and stability of epitheliotrophic factors in AS and PRP and their efficacy in DED patients. Epitheliotrophic factors of interest are epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibronectin, platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB), and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1). We determined that all epitheliotrophic factors were present in AS and PRP at baseline and did not decrease in concentrations in all storage conditions (4 °C for 1 week and at − 20 °C for 1 and 3 months). However, differences in concentrations in AS and PRP were observed. PRP was also shown not to be inferior to AS in terms of efficacy in DED treatment in a prospective randomized control trial which evaluated ocular surface disease index, dry eye questionnaire, ocular surface staining, tear breakup time, and Schirmer test at baseline and at 1-month follow-up. Therefore, with its shorter preparation time, PRP could be considered as an alternative to AS for the treatment of DED.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12879-x
spellingShingle Chanatip Metheetrairut
Panotsom Ngowyutagon
Abhirak Tunganuntarat
Ladawan Khowawisetsut
Kulvara Kittisares
Pinnita Prabhasawat
Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
Scientific Reports
title Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
title_full Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
title_fullStr Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
title_short Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet-rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
title_sort comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in platelet rich plasma versus autologous serum and their treatment efficacy in dry eye disease
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12879-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chanatipmetheetrairut comparisonofepitheliotrophicfactorsinplateletrichplasmaversusautologousserumandtheirtreatmentefficacyindryeyedisease
AT panotsomngowyutagon comparisonofepitheliotrophicfactorsinplateletrichplasmaversusautologousserumandtheirtreatmentefficacyindryeyedisease
AT abhiraktunganuntarat comparisonofepitheliotrophicfactorsinplateletrichplasmaversusautologousserumandtheirtreatmentefficacyindryeyedisease
AT ladawankhowawisetsut comparisonofepitheliotrophicfactorsinplateletrichplasmaversusautologousserumandtheirtreatmentefficacyindryeyedisease
AT kulvarakittisares comparisonofepitheliotrophicfactorsinplateletrichplasmaversusautologousserumandtheirtreatmentefficacyindryeyedisease
AT pinnitaprabhasawat comparisonofepitheliotrophicfactorsinplateletrichplasmaversusautologousserumandtheirtreatmentefficacyindryeyedisease