DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies
Due to their high robustness and simple maintenance, induction motors (IM) are commonly applied in household appliances and industry. Recently, advanced control techniques are being applied to traditional controllers such as field-oriented control (FOC) and torque control (DTC). Dynamic performance...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Electronics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/8/921 |
| _version_ | 1797537940066271232 |
|---|---|
| author | Luis E. Ortega-García Daniela Rodriguez-Sotelo Jose C. Nuñez-Perez Yuma Sandoval-Ibarra Francisco J. Perez-Pinal |
| author_facet | Luis E. Ortega-García Daniela Rodriguez-Sotelo Jose C. Nuñez-Perez Yuma Sandoval-Ibarra Francisco J. Perez-Pinal |
| author_sort | Luis E. Ortega-García |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Due to their high robustness and simple maintenance, induction motors (IM) are commonly applied in household appliances and industry. Recently, advanced control techniques are being applied to traditional controllers such as field-oriented control (FOC) and torque control (DTC). Dynamic performance improvement, hardware simplification and software resource reduction are some of the characteristics reported by these advanced techniques, where a comparison of the new proposal with a traditional structure is generally reported for its validation. However, an assessment between advanced techniques is usually missing. Therefore, we evaluated the traditional FOC and DTC with two additional advanced control modifications, fuzzy and predictive. The resulting six structures were numerically evaluated using MATLAB SIMULINK in a 5 HP four-pole three-phase IM and practically validated using hardware-in-the-loop (Typhoon HIL 402 and DSP TMS320F28035). Speed, torque, phase current and flux response are reported for the six controllers and practical insights are summarized. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T12:23:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a559fb72a5bf41b897ca0a1d79d0ec3f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2079-9292 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T12:23:25Z |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Electronics |
| spelling | doaj.art-a559fb72a5bf41b897ca0a1d79d0ec3f2023-11-21T15:18:59ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922021-04-0110892110.3390/electronics10080921DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control StrategiesLuis E. Ortega-García0Daniela Rodriguez-Sotelo1Jose C. Nuñez-Perez2Yuma Sandoval-Ibarra3Francisco J. Perez-Pinal4Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, MexicoInstituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, MexicoCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo de Tecnología Digital, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Tijuana 22435, Baja California, MexicoDepartamento de Posgrado, Universidad Politécnica de Lázaro Cárdenas (UPLC), Lázaro Cárdenas 60950, Michoacán, MexicoInstituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, MexicoDue to their high robustness and simple maintenance, induction motors (IM) are commonly applied in household appliances and industry. Recently, advanced control techniques are being applied to traditional controllers such as field-oriented control (FOC) and torque control (DTC). Dynamic performance improvement, hardware simplification and software resource reduction are some of the characteristics reported by these advanced techniques, where a comparison of the new proposal with a traditional structure is generally reported for its validation. However, an assessment between advanced techniques is usually missing. Therefore, we evaluated the traditional FOC and DTC with two additional advanced control modifications, fuzzy and predictive. The resulting six structures were numerically evaluated using MATLAB SIMULINK in a 5 HP four-pole three-phase IM and practically validated using hardware-in-the-loop (Typhoon HIL 402 and DSP TMS320F28035). Speed, torque, phase current and flux response are reported for the six controllers and practical insights are summarized.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/8/921automatic controlinduction motorsvariable speed drives |
| spellingShingle | Luis E. Ortega-García Daniela Rodriguez-Sotelo Jose C. Nuñez-Perez Yuma Sandoval-Ibarra Francisco J. Perez-Pinal DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies Electronics automatic control induction motors variable speed drives |
| title | DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies |
| title_full | DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies |
| title_fullStr | DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies |
| title_full_unstemmed | DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies |
| title_short | DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies |
| title_sort | dsp hil comparison between im drive control strategies |
| topic | automatic control induction motors variable speed drives |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/8/921 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT luiseortegagarcia dsphilcomparisonbetweenimdrivecontrolstrategies AT danielarodriguezsotelo dsphilcomparisonbetweenimdrivecontrolstrategies AT josecnunezperez dsphilcomparisonbetweenimdrivecontrolstrategies AT yumasandovalibarra dsphilcomparisonbetweenimdrivecontrolstrategies AT franciscojperezpinal dsphilcomparisonbetweenimdrivecontrolstrategies |