Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences
Open science offers hope for new accountability and transparency in social sciences. Nevertheless, it still fails to fully consider the complexities of qualitative research, as exemplified by a reflection on sensitive qualitative data sharing. As a result, the developing patterns of rewards and sanc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | European Science Editing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/77781/download/pdf/ |
| _version_ | 1797426419873087488 |
|---|---|
| author | Tanja Vuckovic Juros |
| author_facet | Tanja Vuckovic Juros |
| author_sort | Tanja Vuckovic Juros |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Open science offers hope for new accountability and transparency in social sciences. Nevertheless, it still fails to fully consider the complexities of qualitative research, as exemplified by a reflection on sensitive qualitative data sharing. As a result, the developing patterns of rewards and sanctions promoting open science raise concern that quantitative research, whose “replication crisis” brought the open science movement to life, will benefit from “good science” re-evaluations at the expense of other research epistemologies, despite the necessity to define accountability and transparency in social sciences more widely and not to conflate those with either reproducibility or data sharing. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:30:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a56233b57f604e25a453366809c82819 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2518-3354 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:30:59Z |
| publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
| publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Science Editing |
| spelling | doaj.art-a56233b57f604e25a453366809c828192023-12-02T20:15:09ZengPensoft PublishersEuropean Science Editing2518-33542022-04-01481710.3897/ese.2022.e7778177781Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciencesTanja Vuckovic Juros0Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of ZagrebOpen science offers hope for new accountability and transparency in social sciences. Nevertheless, it still fails to fully consider the complexities of qualitative research, as exemplified by a reflection on sensitive qualitative data sharing. As a result, the developing patterns of rewards and sanctions promoting open science raise concern that quantitative research, whose “replication crisis” brought the open science movement to life, will benefit from “good science” re-evaluations at the expense of other research epistemologies, despite the necessity to define accountability and transparency in social sciences more widely and not to conflate those with either reproducibility or data sharing.https://ese.arphahub.com/article/77781/download/pdf/Accountabilityopen sciencequalitative research |
| spellingShingle | Tanja Vuckovic Juros Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences European Science Editing Accountability open science qualitative research |
| title | Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences |
| title_full | Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences |
| title_fullStr | Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences |
| title_full_unstemmed | Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences |
| title_short | Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences |
| title_sort | challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences |
| topic | Accountability open science qualitative research |
| url | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/77781/download/pdf/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tanjavuckovicjuros challengesofqualitativedatasharinginsocialsciences |