Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study

Abstract Background To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the median-to-ulnar nerve ratio (MUR) and the median-to-ulnar nerve difference (MUD) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods In this study, 32 patients with CTS and 32 healthy volunteers were evaluated. All participants receiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Wei Chang, Tsung-Cheng Hsieh, I-Shiang Tzeng, Valeria Chiu, Pei-Jung Huang, Yi-Shiung Horng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-019-0351-3
_version_ 1818885649887920128
author Yi-Wei Chang
Tsung-Cheng Hsieh
I-Shiang Tzeng
Valeria Chiu
Pei-Jung Huang
Yi-Shiung Horng
author_facet Yi-Wei Chang
Tsung-Cheng Hsieh
I-Shiang Tzeng
Valeria Chiu
Pei-Jung Huang
Yi-Shiung Horng
author_sort Yi-Wei Chang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the median-to-ulnar nerve ratio (MUR) and the median-to-ulnar nerve difference (MUD) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods In this study, 32 patients with CTS and 32 healthy volunteers were evaluated. All participants received a series of tests and ultrasound examination for the evaluation of the following criteria: cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the pisiform level (CSA-P), swelling ratio (SR), MUR, MUD, and flattening ratio (FR). Results CSA-P, SR, MUR, and MUD were all significantly larger in the patients with CTS than in the healthy volunteers. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of MUD, MUR, CSA-P, and SR were 0.78, 0.75, 0.70, and 0.61 respectively. MUD had higher sensitivity (84%) than MUR, CSA-P, and SR (sensitivity: 63, 63, and 53%, respectively). Conclusions By using the ulnar nerve area at the pisiform level as an internal control parameter, the MUD and MUR methods showed higher diagnostic accuracy than SR in patients with CTS. Further application of these methods in research and clinical settings is recommended. Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov NCT03033173. Registered 18 January 2017. Retrospectively registered.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:08:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a56e7db7062b442898ab0f987ebbb26f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2342
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:08:48Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Imaging
spelling doaj.art-a56e7db7062b442898ab0f987ebbb26f2022-12-21T20:14:47ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422019-07-011911910.1186/s12880-019-0351-3Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control studyYi-Wei Chang0Tsung-Cheng Hsieh1I-Shiang Tzeng2Valeria Chiu3Pei-Jung Huang4Yi-Shiung Horng5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, Buddhist Tzuchi Medical FoundationInstitute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi UniversityDepartment of Research Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, Buddhist Tzuchi Medical FoundationDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, Buddhist Tzuchi Medical FoundationDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, Buddhist Tzuchi Medical FoundationDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, Buddhist Tzuchi Medical FoundationAbstract Background To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the median-to-ulnar nerve ratio (MUR) and the median-to-ulnar nerve difference (MUD) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods In this study, 32 patients with CTS and 32 healthy volunteers were evaluated. All participants received a series of tests and ultrasound examination for the evaluation of the following criteria: cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the pisiform level (CSA-P), swelling ratio (SR), MUR, MUD, and flattening ratio (FR). Results CSA-P, SR, MUR, and MUD were all significantly larger in the patients with CTS than in the healthy volunteers. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of MUD, MUR, CSA-P, and SR were 0.78, 0.75, 0.70, and 0.61 respectively. MUD had higher sensitivity (84%) than MUR, CSA-P, and SR (sensitivity: 63, 63, and 53%, respectively). Conclusions By using the ulnar nerve area at the pisiform level as an internal control parameter, the MUD and MUR methods showed higher diagnostic accuracy than SR in patients with CTS. Further application of these methods in research and clinical settings is recommended. Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov NCT03033173. Registered 18 January 2017. Retrospectively registered.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-019-0351-3Carpal tunnel syndromeMedian nerveUlnar nerveUltrasoundMedian nerve entrapment
spellingShingle Yi-Wei Chang
Tsung-Cheng Hsieh
I-Shiang Tzeng
Valeria Chiu
Pei-Jung Huang
Yi-Shiung Horng
Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study
BMC Medical Imaging
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Median nerve
Ulnar nerve
Ultrasound
Median nerve entrapment
title Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study
title_full Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study
title_fullStr Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study
title_short Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study
title_sort ratio and difference of the cross sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome a case control study
topic Carpal tunnel syndrome
Median nerve
Ulnar nerve
Ultrasound
Median nerve entrapment
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-019-0351-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yiweichang ratioanddifferenceofthecrosssectionalareaofmediannervetoulnarnerveindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT tsungchenghsieh ratioanddifferenceofthecrosssectionalareaofmediannervetoulnarnerveindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT ishiangtzeng ratioanddifferenceofthecrosssectionalareaofmediannervetoulnarnerveindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT valeriachiu ratioanddifferenceofthecrosssectionalareaofmediannervetoulnarnerveindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT peijunghuang ratioanddifferenceofthecrosssectionalareaofmediannervetoulnarnerveindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT yishiunghorng ratioanddifferenceofthecrosssectionalareaofmediannervetoulnarnerveindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeacasecontrolstudy