First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator
Abstract Ecological monitoring is crucial for tracking changes in the status of species over time. However, ensuring that monitoring programs possess adequate statistical power—capacity to detect changes in populations with a high level of confidence—remains a challenge for many wildlife managers gl...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | Conservation Science and Practice |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12881 |
| _version_ | 1811173252918149120 |
|---|---|
| author | Harry A. Moore Judy A. Dunlop Hayley M. Geyle Leanne Greenwood Dale G. Nimmo |
| author_facet | Harry A. Moore Judy A. Dunlop Hayley M. Geyle Leanne Greenwood Dale G. Nimmo |
| author_sort | Harry A. Moore |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Ecological monitoring is crucial for tracking changes in the status of species over time. However, ensuring that monitoring programs possess adequate statistical power—capacity to detect changes in populations with a high level of confidence—remains a challenge for many wildlife managers globally. While new monitoring technologies potentially offer cost effective solutions to this problem, transitioning to these methods requires careful calibration with existing techniques, such that differences in power and cost can be measured and assessed accurately. Here, we compare new (camera traps) and conventional (live trapping) survey methods in terms of cost and statistical power in tracking occupancy declines in an endangered marsupial predator, the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus). We show that camera trap monitoring designs can detect northern quoll occupancy declines of 30%, 50%, and 80% at reduced cost when compared to live trap designs, without compromising statistical power. Overall, we find support for the cost‐effectiveness of camera traps for species monitoring and its potential to replace existing live trap sampling of species when measuring changes in occupancy. Additionally, we offer a robust framework to compare new monitoring techniques against pre‐existing methods on the basis of statistical power. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:44:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a5717291e9eb405eb5493dfe914bf37d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2578-4854 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:44:32Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Conservation Science and Practice |
| spelling | doaj.art-a5717291e9eb405eb5493dfe914bf37d2023-02-03T05:35:48ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542023-02-0152n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12881First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predatorHarry A. Moore0Judy A. Dunlop1Hayley M. Geyle2Leanne Greenwood3Dale G. Nimmo4Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Bentley Delivery Centre Perth Western Australia AustraliaGulbali Institute School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University Albury New South Wales AustraliaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University Casuarina Northern Territory AustraliaGulbali Institute School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University Albury New South Wales AustraliaGulbali Institute School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University Albury New South Wales AustraliaAbstract Ecological monitoring is crucial for tracking changes in the status of species over time. However, ensuring that monitoring programs possess adequate statistical power—capacity to detect changes in populations with a high level of confidence—remains a challenge for many wildlife managers globally. While new monitoring technologies potentially offer cost effective solutions to this problem, transitioning to these methods requires careful calibration with existing techniques, such that differences in power and cost can be measured and assessed accurately. Here, we compare new (camera traps) and conventional (live trapping) survey methods in terms of cost and statistical power in tracking occupancy declines in an endangered marsupial predator, the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus). We show that camera trap monitoring designs can detect northern quoll occupancy declines of 30%, 50%, and 80% at reduced cost when compared to live trap designs, without compromising statistical power. Overall, we find support for the cost‐effectiveness of camera traps for species monitoring and its potential to replace existing live trap sampling of species when measuring changes in occupancy. Additionally, we offer a robust framework to compare new monitoring techniques against pre‐existing methods on the basis of statistical power.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12881camera trapDasyuriddetectabilitymanagementmarsupialmonitoring |
| spellingShingle | Harry A. Moore Judy A. Dunlop Hayley M. Geyle Leanne Greenwood Dale G. Nimmo First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator Conservation Science and Practice camera trap Dasyurid detectability management marsupial monitoring |
| title | First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator |
| title_full | First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator |
| title_fullStr | First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator |
| title_full_unstemmed | First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator |
| title_short | First you get the money, then you get the power: Comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator |
| title_sort | first you get the money then you get the power comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator |
| topic | camera trap Dasyurid detectability management marsupial monitoring |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12881 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT harryamoore firstyougetthemoneythenyougetthepowercomparingthecostandpowerofmonitoringprogramstodetectchangesinoccupancyofathreatenedmarsupialpredator AT judyadunlop firstyougetthemoneythenyougetthepowercomparingthecostandpowerofmonitoringprogramstodetectchangesinoccupancyofathreatenedmarsupialpredator AT hayleymgeyle firstyougetthemoneythenyougetthepowercomparingthecostandpowerofmonitoringprogramstodetectchangesinoccupancyofathreatenedmarsupialpredator AT leannegreenwood firstyougetthemoneythenyougetthepowercomparingthecostandpowerofmonitoringprogramstodetectchangesinoccupancyofathreatenedmarsupialpredator AT dalegnimmo firstyougetthemoneythenyougetthepowercomparingthecostandpowerofmonitoringprogramstodetectchangesinoccupancyofathreatenedmarsupialpredator |