Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds

Abstract Protected areas are important for preventing biodiversity declines, yet indicators of species' trends in protected areas rarely include threatened species. We use data from the first national Threatened Species Index developed in Australia to report on trends for threatened and near‐th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Bayraktarov, Diego F. Correa, Andrés F. Suarez‐Castro, Stephen T. Garnett, Nicholas A. Macgregor, Hugh P. Possingham, Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:Conservation Science and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.443
_version_ 1818848494494941184
author Elisa Bayraktarov
Diego F. Correa
Andrés F. Suarez‐Castro
Stephen T. Garnett
Nicholas A. Macgregor
Hugh P. Possingham
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
author_facet Elisa Bayraktarov
Diego F. Correa
Andrés F. Suarez‐Castro
Stephen T. Garnett
Nicholas A. Macgregor
Hugh P. Possingham
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
author_sort Elisa Bayraktarov
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Protected areas are important for preventing biodiversity declines, yet indicators of species' trends in protected areas rarely include threatened species. We use data from the first national Threatened Species Index developed in Australia to report on trends for threatened and near‐threatened birds inside and outside terrestrial and marine protected areas. We adopted the Living Planet Index to calculate trends for 39 bird taxa at 16,742 monitoring sites (11,539 inside and 5,203 outside PAs) between 1985 and 2016. At a continental scale, the overall decline in the national index was smaller inside protected areas (66% decrease in average population abundance) than outside (77%), although after 2000 declines were greater within (36%) versus outside (26%) protected areas. Five out of seven jurisdictions showed similar switching in patterns over time. Protected areas initially had a greater net positive effect on trends of more imperiled birds than less imperiled birds, but between 2000 and 2016 declines of the most imperiled birds were greater inside protected areas than outside. Our analyses suggest that the effectiveness of Australia's protected area network at improving trends in threatened species has weakened, and support the hypothesis that trends for terrestrial birds outside PAs might be improving due to increased conservation efforts on private land. Although this study represents the most comprehensive collation of threatened species population time series and trends ever for Australia, the number of monitoring sites inside PAs was double that outside PAs, even though on average, more than 70% of threatened bird distributions occur outside PAs, with important gaps in monitoring across space, time and taxa that need to be filled to fully understand the effectiveness of public and private conservation actions at a national level. The results underline the importance of active management plus monitoring to track and report on long‐term trends across species.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T06:18:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5767c6410374fe4ae350155f98f263f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2578-4854
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T06:18:14Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Science and Practice
spelling doaj.art-a5767c6410374fe4ae350155f98f263f2022-12-21T20:32:48ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542021-07-0137n/an/a10.1111/csp2.443Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birdsElisa Bayraktarov0Diego F. Correa1Andrés F. Suarez‐Castro2Stephen T. Garnett3Nicholas A. Macgregor4Hugh P. Possingham5Ayesha I. T. Tulloch6Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland AustraliaCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland AustraliaCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland AustraliaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Casuarina Northern Territory AustraliaParks Australia Canberra Australian Capital Territory AustraliaCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland AustraliaCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland AustraliaAbstract Protected areas are important for preventing biodiversity declines, yet indicators of species' trends in protected areas rarely include threatened species. We use data from the first national Threatened Species Index developed in Australia to report on trends for threatened and near‐threatened birds inside and outside terrestrial and marine protected areas. We adopted the Living Planet Index to calculate trends for 39 bird taxa at 16,742 monitoring sites (11,539 inside and 5,203 outside PAs) between 1985 and 2016. At a continental scale, the overall decline in the national index was smaller inside protected areas (66% decrease in average population abundance) than outside (77%), although after 2000 declines were greater within (36%) versus outside (26%) protected areas. Five out of seven jurisdictions showed similar switching in patterns over time. Protected areas initially had a greater net positive effect on trends of more imperiled birds than less imperiled birds, but between 2000 and 2016 declines of the most imperiled birds were greater inside protected areas than outside. Our analyses suggest that the effectiveness of Australia's protected area network at improving trends in threatened species has weakened, and support the hypothesis that trends for terrestrial birds outside PAs might be improving due to increased conservation efforts on private land. Although this study represents the most comprehensive collation of threatened species population time series and trends ever for Australia, the number of monitoring sites inside PAs was double that outside PAs, even though on average, more than 70% of threatened bird distributions occur outside PAs, with important gaps in monitoring across space, time and taxa that need to be filled to fully understand the effectiveness of public and private conservation actions at a national level. The results underline the importance of active management plus monitoring to track and report on long‐term trends across species.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.443imperiled birdsindicatorslong‐term ecological monitoringmanagement effectivenesspopulation trendsprivate land conservation
spellingShingle Elisa Bayraktarov
Diego F. Correa
Andrés F. Suarez‐Castro
Stephen T. Garnett
Nicholas A. Macgregor
Hugh P. Possingham
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds
Conservation Science and Practice
imperiled birds
indicators
long‐term ecological monitoring
management effectiveness
population trends
private land conservation
title Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds
title_full Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds
title_fullStr Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds
title_full_unstemmed Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds
title_short Variable effects of protected areas on long‐term multispecies trends for Australia's imperiled birds
title_sort variable effects of protected areas on long term multispecies trends for australia s imperiled birds
topic imperiled birds
indicators
long‐term ecological monitoring
management effectiveness
population trends
private land conservation
url https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.443
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabayraktarov variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds
AT diegofcorrea variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds
AT andresfsuarezcastro variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds
AT stephentgarnett variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds
AT nicholasamacgregor variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds
AT hughppossingham variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds
AT ayeshaittulloch variableeffectsofprotectedareasonlongtermmultispeciestrendsforaustraliasimperiledbirds