Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners
Purpose. To compare the reliability of five different intraoral scanners (IOSs) in the capture of implant scanbodies (SBs) and to verify the dimensional congruence between the meshes (MEs) of the SBs and the corresponding library file (LF). Methods. A gypsum cast of a fully edentulous maxilla with s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2174 |
| _version_ | 1797562864010002432 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Mangano Henriette Lerner Bidzina Margiani Ivan Solop Nadezhda Latuta Oleg Admakin |
| author_facet | Francesco Mangano Henriette Lerner Bidzina Margiani Ivan Solop Nadezhda Latuta Oleg Admakin |
| author_sort | Francesco Mangano |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose. To compare the reliability of five different intraoral scanners (IOSs) in the capture of implant scanbodies (SBs) and to verify the dimensional congruence between the meshes (MEs) of the SBs and the corresponding library file (LF). Methods. A gypsum cast of a fully edentulous maxilla with six implant analogues and SBs screwed on was scanned with five different IOSs (PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup>, CS 3700<sup>®</sup>, MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup>, ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup>, and Emerald S<sup>®</sup>). Ten scans were taken for each IOS. The resulting MEs were imported to reverse engineering software for 3D analysis, consisting of the superimposition of the SB LF onto each SB ME. Then, a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the deviations between MEs and LF was performed. A careful statistical analysis was performed. Results. PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup> showed the highest congruence between SB MEs and LF, with the lowest mean absolute deviation (25.5 ± 5.0 μm), immediately followed by CS 3700<sup>®</sup> (27.0 ± 4.3 μm); the difference between them was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.1235). PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup> showed a significantly higher congruence than MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> (29.8 ± 4.8 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> (34.2 ± 9.3 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (38.3 ± 7.8 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). CS 3700<sup>®</sup> had a significantly higher congruence than MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.0004), ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Significant differences were also found between MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> and ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Significant differences were found among different SBs when scanned with the same IOS. The deviations of the IOSs showed different directions and patterns. With PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup>, ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup>, and Emerald S<sup>®</sup>, the MEs were included inside the LF; with CS 3700<sup>®</sup>, the LF was included in the MEs. MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> showed interpolation between the MEs and LF, with no clear direction for the deviation. Conclusions. Statistically different levels of congruence were found between the SB MEs and the corresponding LF when using different IOSs. Significant differences were also found between different SBs when scanned with the same IOS. Finally, the qualitative evaluation revealed different directions and patterns for the five IOSs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:34:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a57a39d9324849a2a20dd84e15e7446b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-0383 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:34:47Z |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-a57a39d9324849a2a20dd84e15e7446b2023-11-20T06:19:35ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-07-0197217410.3390/jcm9072174Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral ScannersFrancesco Mangano0Henriette Lerner1Bidzina Margiani2Ivan Solop3Nadezhda Latuta4Oleg Admakin5Private Practice, Gravedona, 22015 Como, ItalyPrivate Practice, Ludwing-Wilhelm Strasse, 76530 Baden-Baden, GermanyDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, RussiaPurpose. To compare the reliability of five different intraoral scanners (IOSs) in the capture of implant scanbodies (SBs) and to verify the dimensional congruence between the meshes (MEs) of the SBs and the corresponding library file (LF). Methods. A gypsum cast of a fully edentulous maxilla with six implant analogues and SBs screwed on was scanned with five different IOSs (PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup>, CS 3700<sup>®</sup>, MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup>, ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup>, and Emerald S<sup>®</sup>). Ten scans were taken for each IOS. The resulting MEs were imported to reverse engineering software for 3D analysis, consisting of the superimposition of the SB LF onto each SB ME. Then, a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the deviations between MEs and LF was performed. A careful statistical analysis was performed. Results. PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup> showed the highest congruence between SB MEs and LF, with the lowest mean absolute deviation (25.5 ± 5.0 μm), immediately followed by CS 3700<sup>®</sup> (27.0 ± 4.3 μm); the difference between them was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.1235). PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup> showed a significantly higher congruence than MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> (29.8 ± 4.8 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> (34.2 ± 9.3 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (38.3 ± 7.8 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). CS 3700<sup>®</sup> had a significantly higher congruence than MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.0004), ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Significant differences were also found between MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> and ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup> and Emerald S<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Significant differences were found among different SBs when scanned with the same IOS. The deviations of the IOSs showed different directions and patterns. With PRIMESCAN<sup>®</sup>, ITERO ELEMENTS 5D<sup>®</sup>, and Emerald S<sup>®</sup>, the MEs were included inside the LF; with CS 3700<sup>®</sup>, the LF was included in the MEs. MEDIT i-500<sup>®</sup> showed interpolation between the MEs and LF, with no clear direction for the deviation. Conclusions. Statistically different levels of congruence were found between the SB MEs and the corresponding LF when using different IOSs. Significant differences were also found between different SBs when scanned with the same IOS. Finally, the qualitative evaluation revealed different directions and patterns for the five IOSs.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2174Intraoral scannerScanbodyMeshLibraryCongruenceQuantitative evaluation |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Mangano Henriette Lerner Bidzina Margiani Ivan Solop Nadezhda Latuta Oleg Admakin Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners Journal of Clinical Medicine Intraoral scanner Scanbody Mesh Library Congruence Quantitative evaluation |
| title | Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners |
| title_full | Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners |
| title_fullStr | Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners |
| title_full_unstemmed | Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners |
| title_short | Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners |
| title_sort | congruence between meshes and library files of implant scanbodies an in vitro study comparing five intraoral scanners |
| topic | Intraoral scanner Scanbody Mesh Library Congruence Quantitative evaluation |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2174 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescomangano congruencebetweenmeshesandlibraryfilesofimplantscanbodiesaninvitrostudycomparingfiveintraoralscanners AT henriettelerner congruencebetweenmeshesandlibraryfilesofimplantscanbodiesaninvitrostudycomparingfiveintraoralscanners AT bidzinamargiani congruencebetweenmeshesandlibraryfilesofimplantscanbodiesaninvitrostudycomparingfiveintraoralscanners AT ivansolop congruencebetweenmeshesandlibraryfilesofimplantscanbodiesaninvitrostudycomparingfiveintraoralscanners AT nadezhdalatuta congruencebetweenmeshesandlibraryfilesofimplantscanbodiesaninvitrostudycomparingfiveintraoralscanners AT olegadmakin congruencebetweenmeshesandlibraryfilesofimplantscanbodiesaninvitrostudycomparingfiveintraoralscanners |