Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACTPurpose. Suicide is a major cause of preventable death worldwide. Adequate training in risk assessment and intervention is key to suicide prevention. The use of simulation (role plays, simulated patients, virtual reality…) for practical training is a promising tool in mental health. The purp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Océane Richard, Fabrice Jollant, Grégoire Billon, Chris Attoe, Dominique Vodovar, Marie-Aude Piot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2023.2199469
_version_ 1797450049946386432
author Océane Richard
Fabrice Jollant
Grégoire Billon
Chris Attoe
Dominique Vodovar
Marie-Aude Piot
author_facet Océane Richard
Fabrice Jollant
Grégoire Billon
Chris Attoe
Dominique Vodovar
Marie-Aude Piot
author_sort Océane Richard
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTPurpose. Suicide is a major cause of preventable death worldwide. Adequate training in risk assessment and intervention is key to suicide prevention. The use of simulation (role plays, simulated patients, virtual reality…) for practical training is a promising tool in mental health. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention for healthcare professionals and gatekeepers. Methods. We conducted a systematic review in Medline and PsycINFO up to 31 July 2021 of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, and pre/post-test studies. RCTs were furthermore included in a meta-analysis. We assessed the methodological quality of all studies with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for RCTs. Primary outcomes were changes in Kirkpatrick criteria: attitudes, skills, knowledge, behaviors, and patient outcomes. Results. We included 96 articles representing 43,656 participants. Most pre/post-test (n = 65) and non-randomized controlled (n = 14) studies showed significant improvement in attitudes, skills, knowledge, and behaviors. The meta-analysis of 11 RCTs showed positive changes in attitudes immediately after training and at 2–4 months post-training; in self-perceived skills at 6 months post-training; but not in factual knowledge. Studies assessing benefits for patients are still limited. Conclusions. The heterogeneity of methodological designs, interventions, and trained populations combined with a limited number of RCTs and studies on patients’ outcomes limit the strength of the evidence. However, preliminary findings suggest that simulation is promising for practical training in suicidal crisis intervention and should be further studied.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:33:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5859808a4554f4c8fe405c84f4d0dc5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1087-2981
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:33:58Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Medical Education Online
spelling doaj.art-a5859808a4554f4c8fe405c84f4d0dc52023-11-27T16:01:58ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812023-12-0128110.1080/10872981.2023.2199469Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysisOcéane Richard0Fabrice Jollant1Grégoire Billon2Chris Attoe3Dominique Vodovar4Marie-Aude Piot5Department of child and adolescent psychiatry,Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Academic Hospital Necker-Enfants Malades, Reference center for autism and learning disorders, Paris, FranceDepartment of psychiatry, CHU Bicêtre, APHP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Department of psychiatry, CHU Nimes, Nimes, France; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Paris-Saclay University, le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; McGill University, McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Montreal, Canada; Moods Team, INSERM UMR-1178, CESP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceMental helath simulation center, Maudsley Learning, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKMental helath simulation center, Maudsley Learning, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKUniversité Paris Cité, UFR de médecine, 75010 Paris; UMRS 1144, Faculté de pharmacie, 75006 Paris; Centre AntiPoison de Paris, ParisDepartment of child and adolescent psychiatry, Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Academic Hospital Necker-Enfants Malades Reference center for autism and learning disorders; Ilumens, Simulation Center; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, FranceABSTRACTPurpose. Suicide is a major cause of preventable death worldwide. Adequate training in risk assessment and intervention is key to suicide prevention. The use of simulation (role plays, simulated patients, virtual reality…) for practical training is a promising tool in mental health. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention for healthcare professionals and gatekeepers. Methods. We conducted a systematic review in Medline and PsycINFO up to 31 July 2021 of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, and pre/post-test studies. RCTs were furthermore included in a meta-analysis. We assessed the methodological quality of all studies with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for RCTs. Primary outcomes were changes in Kirkpatrick criteria: attitudes, skills, knowledge, behaviors, and patient outcomes. Results. We included 96 articles representing 43,656 participants. Most pre/post-test (n = 65) and non-randomized controlled (n = 14) studies showed significant improvement in attitudes, skills, knowledge, and behaviors. The meta-analysis of 11 RCTs showed positive changes in attitudes immediately after training and at 2–4 months post-training; in self-perceived skills at 6 months post-training; but not in factual knowledge. Studies assessing benefits for patients are still limited. Conclusions. The heterogeneity of methodological designs, interventions, and trained populations combined with a limited number of RCTs and studies on patients’ outcomes limit the strength of the evidence. However, preliminary findings suggest that simulation is promising for practical training in suicidal crisis intervention and should be further studied.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2023.2199469Suicidesuicidal ideationteachingsimulation trainingMental disorders
spellingShingle Océane Richard
Fabrice Jollant
Grégoire Billon
Chris Attoe
Dominique Vodovar
Marie-Aude Piot
Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Medical Education Online
Suicide
suicidal ideation
teaching
simulation training
Mental disorders
title Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort simulation training in suicide risk assessment and intervention a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Suicide
suicidal ideation
teaching
simulation training
Mental disorders
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2023.2199469
work_keys_str_mv AT oceanerichard simulationtraininginsuicideriskassessmentandinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fabricejollant simulationtraininginsuicideriskassessmentandinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gregoirebillon simulationtraininginsuicideriskassessmentandinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chrisattoe simulationtraininginsuicideriskassessmentandinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dominiquevodovar simulationtraininginsuicideriskassessmentandinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marieaudepiot simulationtraininginsuicideriskassessmentandinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis