Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures

Abstract Background Extensile lateral approach had been recognized as the gold standard technique for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) while sinus tarsi approach had been increasingly valued by surgeons and comparative clinical outcome was shown in both techniques. Appropriate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zihua Li, Xinbo Wu, Haichao Zhou, Shaochen Xu, Fajiao Xiao, Hui Huang, Yunfeng Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01963-5
_version_ 1811279060646494208
author Zihua Li
Xinbo Wu
Haichao Zhou
Shaochen Xu
Fajiao Xiao
Hui Huang
Yunfeng Yang
author_facet Zihua Li
Xinbo Wu
Haichao Zhou
Shaochen Xu
Fajiao Xiao
Hui Huang
Yunfeng Yang
author_sort Zihua Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Extensile lateral approach had been recognized as the gold standard technique for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) while sinus tarsi approach had been increasingly valued by surgeons and comparative clinical outcome was shown in both techniques. Appropriate decisions could be made by the clinicians with the help of cost-utility analysis (CUA) about optimal healthcare for type II/III calcaneus fracture. Method A single-center, retrospective study was conducted in which basic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and health care costs of 109 patients had been obtained and analyzed. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, validated by EuroQol five-dimensional-three levels (EQ-5D-3L), were used to enumerate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost per QALY. Results One hundred nine patients were enrolled in our study including 62 in the ELA group and 47 in the STA group. There were no significant differences between these two groups in mean total cost, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation expense, surgery, anesthesia, and antibiotic expense. The expense of internal fixation materials ($3289.0 ± 543.9) versus ($2630.6 ± 763.7) and analgesia ($145.8 ± 85.6) versus ($102.9 ± 62.7) in ELA group were significantly higher than in the STA group (P < .001, P = .008, respectively). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores showed significant difference at postoperative 3 and 5 days (P < .001). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores and the Bohlers’ and Gissane angle showed no significant differences between the two groups before and after the operation. The cost-effectiveness ratios of ELA and STA were $8766.8 ± 2835.2/QALY and $7914.9 ± 1822.0/QALY respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) of ELA over STA was $32110.00/QALY, but both showed no significant difference. Conclusion Both ELA and STA techniques are effective operative procedures for the patients with calcaneus fracture. Moreover, STA seems to be more reasonable for its merits including less postoperative pain, and less expense of analgesia as well as internal fixation materials. Level of evidence 5
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:46:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a593f42a7c6c44728b1cf5bf5e670aff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:46:52Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-a593f42a7c6c44728b1cf5bf5e670aff2022-12-22T03:09:58ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2020-09-011511910.1186/s13018-020-01963-5Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fracturesZihua Li0Xinbo Wu1Haichao Zhou2Shaochen Xu3Fajiao Xiao4Hui Huang5Yunfeng Yang6Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineAbstract Background Extensile lateral approach had been recognized as the gold standard technique for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) while sinus tarsi approach had been increasingly valued by surgeons and comparative clinical outcome was shown in both techniques. Appropriate decisions could be made by the clinicians with the help of cost-utility analysis (CUA) about optimal healthcare for type II/III calcaneus fracture. Method A single-center, retrospective study was conducted in which basic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and health care costs of 109 patients had been obtained and analyzed. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, validated by EuroQol five-dimensional-three levels (EQ-5D-3L), were used to enumerate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost per QALY. Results One hundred nine patients were enrolled in our study including 62 in the ELA group and 47 in the STA group. There were no significant differences between these two groups in mean total cost, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation expense, surgery, anesthesia, and antibiotic expense. The expense of internal fixation materials ($3289.0 ± 543.9) versus ($2630.6 ± 763.7) and analgesia ($145.8 ± 85.6) versus ($102.9 ± 62.7) in ELA group were significantly higher than in the STA group (P < .001, P = .008, respectively). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores showed significant difference at postoperative 3 and 5 days (P < .001). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores and the Bohlers’ and Gissane angle showed no significant differences between the two groups before and after the operation. The cost-effectiveness ratios of ELA and STA were $8766.8 ± 2835.2/QALY and $7914.9 ± 1822.0/QALY respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) of ELA over STA was $32110.00/QALY, but both showed no significant difference. Conclusion Both ELA and STA techniques are effective operative procedures for the patients with calcaneus fracture. Moreover, STA seems to be more reasonable for its merits including less postoperative pain, and less expense of analgesia as well as internal fixation materials. Level of evidence 5http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01963-5Cost-utility analysisCalcaneus fractureExtensile lateral approachSinus tarsi approach
spellingShingle Zihua Li
Xinbo Wu
Haichao Zhou
Shaochen Xu
Fajiao Xiao
Hui Huang
Yunfeng Yang
Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Cost-utility analysis
Calcaneus fracture
Extensile lateral approach
Sinus tarsi approach
title Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures
title_full Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures
title_fullStr Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures
title_short Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures
title_sort cost utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in sanders type ii iii calcaneus fractures
topic Cost-utility analysis
Calcaneus fracture
Extensile lateral approach
Sinus tarsi approach
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01963-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zihuali costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures
AT xinbowu costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures
AT haichaozhou costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures
AT shaochenxu costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures
AT fajiaoxiao costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures
AT huihuang costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures
AT yunfengyang costutilityanalysisofextensilelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachinsanderstypeiiiiicalcaneusfractures