Double Jeopardy in Inferring Cognitive Processes
Inferences we make about underlying cognitive processes can be jeopardized in two ways due to problematic forms of aggregation. First, averaging across individuals is typically considered a very useful tool for removing random variability. The threat is that averaging across subjects leads to averag...
Main Author: | Mario eFific |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01130/full |
Similar Items
-
Diagnostic challenges and treatment options in patients with solitary fibrous tumor: A single-center observational study
by: Andrej Ozaniak, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?
by: Jeffrey Rouder, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
EL RETO DEL SEGUIMIENTO FARMACOTERAPÉUTICO EN MIGRAÑA CRÓNICA
by: Anna Grau Martínez
Published: (2016-06-01) -
EL RETO DEL SEGUIMIENTO FARMACOTERAPÉUTICO EN MIGRAÑA CRÓNICA
by: Anna Grau Martínez
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Inference and preference in intertemporal choice
by: William J. Skylark, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)