A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.

Calculating the cost per disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted associated with interventions is an increasing popular means of assessing the cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve population health. However, there has been no systematic attempt to characterize the literature and its ev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter J Neumann, Teja Thorat, Yue Zhong, Jordan Anderson, Megan Farquhar, Mark Salem, Eileen Sandberg, Cayla J Saret, Colby Wilkinson, Joshua T Cohen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5179084?pdf=render
_version_ 1828808922122682368
author Peter J Neumann
Teja Thorat
Yue Zhong
Jordan Anderson
Megan Farquhar
Mark Salem
Eileen Sandberg
Cayla J Saret
Colby Wilkinson
Joshua T Cohen
author_facet Peter J Neumann
Teja Thorat
Yue Zhong
Jordan Anderson
Megan Farquhar
Mark Salem
Eileen Sandberg
Cayla J Saret
Colby Wilkinson
Joshua T Cohen
author_sort Peter J Neumann
collection DOAJ
description Calculating the cost per disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted associated with interventions is an increasing popular means of assessing the cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve population health. However, there has been no systematic attempt to characterize the literature and its evolution.We conducted a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies reporting cost-per-DALY averted from 2000 through 2015. We developed the Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (GHCEA) Registry, a repository of English-language cost-per-DALY averted studies indexed in PubMed. To identify candidate studies, we searched PubMed for articles with titles or abstracts containing the phrases "disability-adjusted" or "DALY". Two reviewers with training in health economics independently reviewed each article selected in our abstract review, gathering information using a standardized data collection form. We summarized descriptive characteristics on study methodology: e.g., intervention type, country of study, study funder, study perspective, along with methodological and reporting practices over two time periods: 2000-2009 and 2010-2015. We analyzed the types of costs included in analyses, the study quality on a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high), and examined the correlation between diseases researched and the burden of disease in different world regions.We identified 479 cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2000 through 2015. Studies from Sub-Saharan Africa comprised the largest portion of published studies. The disease areas most commonly studied were communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional disorders (67%), followed by non-communicable diseases (28%). A high proportion of studies evaluated primary prevention strategies (59%). Pharmaceutical interventions were commonly assessed (32%) followed by immunizations (28%). Adherence to good practices for conducting and reporting cost-effectiveness analysis varied considerably. Studies mainly included formal healthcare sector costs. A large number of the studies in Sub-Saharan Africa addressed high-burden conditions such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, neglected tropical diseases and malaria, and diarrhea, lower respiratory infections, meningitis, and other common infectious diseases.The Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry reveals a growing and diverse field of cost-per-DALY averted studies. However, study methods and reporting practices have varied substantially.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:48:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5b826284e4a4ae7ba9d0c951d698784
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:48:08Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-a5b826284e4a4ae7ba9d0c951d6987842022-12-22T00:30:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011112e016851210.1371/journal.pone.0168512A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.Peter J NeumannTeja ThoratYue ZhongJordan AndersonMegan FarquharMark SalemEileen SandbergCayla J SaretColby WilkinsonJoshua T CohenCalculating the cost per disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted associated with interventions is an increasing popular means of assessing the cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve population health. However, there has been no systematic attempt to characterize the literature and its evolution.We conducted a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies reporting cost-per-DALY averted from 2000 through 2015. We developed the Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (GHCEA) Registry, a repository of English-language cost-per-DALY averted studies indexed in PubMed. To identify candidate studies, we searched PubMed for articles with titles or abstracts containing the phrases "disability-adjusted" or "DALY". Two reviewers with training in health economics independently reviewed each article selected in our abstract review, gathering information using a standardized data collection form. We summarized descriptive characteristics on study methodology: e.g., intervention type, country of study, study funder, study perspective, along with methodological and reporting practices over two time periods: 2000-2009 and 2010-2015. We analyzed the types of costs included in analyses, the study quality on a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high), and examined the correlation between diseases researched and the burden of disease in different world regions.We identified 479 cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2000 through 2015. Studies from Sub-Saharan Africa comprised the largest portion of published studies. The disease areas most commonly studied were communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional disorders (67%), followed by non-communicable diseases (28%). A high proportion of studies evaluated primary prevention strategies (59%). Pharmaceutical interventions were commonly assessed (32%) followed by immunizations (28%). Adherence to good practices for conducting and reporting cost-effectiveness analysis varied considerably. Studies mainly included formal healthcare sector costs. A large number of the studies in Sub-Saharan Africa addressed high-burden conditions such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, neglected tropical diseases and malaria, and diarrhea, lower respiratory infections, meningitis, and other common infectious diseases.The Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry reveals a growing and diverse field of cost-per-DALY averted studies. However, study methods and reporting practices have varied substantially.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5179084?pdf=render
spellingShingle Peter J Neumann
Teja Thorat
Yue Zhong
Jordan Anderson
Megan Farquhar
Mark Salem
Eileen Sandberg
Cayla J Saret
Colby Wilkinson
Joshua T Cohen
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
PLoS ONE
title A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
title_full A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
title_short A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
title_sort systematic review of cost effectiveness studies reporting cost per daly averted
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5179084?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT peterjneumann asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT tejathorat asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT yuezhong asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT jordananderson asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT meganfarquhar asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT marksalem asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT eileensandberg asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT caylajsaret asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT colbywilkinson asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT joshuatcohen asystematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT peterjneumann systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT tejathorat systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT yuezhong systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT jordananderson systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT meganfarquhar systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT marksalem systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT eileensandberg systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT caylajsaret systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT colbywilkinson systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted
AT joshuatcohen systematicreviewofcosteffectivenessstudiesreportingcostperdalyaverted