Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer

In this work, a hybrid procedure for bearing fault identification using a machine learning and adaptive cascade observer is explained. To design an adaptive cascade observer, the normal signal approximation is the first step. Therefore, the fuzzy orthonormal regressive (FOR) technique was developed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farzin Piltan, Jong-Myon Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/17/5827
_version_ 1797556177011212288
author Farzin Piltan
Jong-Myon Kim
author_facet Farzin Piltan
Jong-Myon Kim
author_sort Farzin Piltan
collection DOAJ
description In this work, a hybrid procedure for bearing fault identification using a machine learning and adaptive cascade observer is explained. To design an adaptive cascade observer, the normal signal approximation is the first step. Therefore, the fuzzy orthonormal regressive (FOR) technique was developed to approximate the acoustic emission (AE) and vibration (non-stationary and nonlinear) bearing signals in normal conditions. After approximating the normal signal of bearing using the FOR technique, the adaptive cascade observer is modeled in four steps. First, the linear observation technique using a FOR proportional-integral (PI) observer (FOR-PIO) is developed. In the second step, to increase the power of uncertaintie rejection (robustness) of the FOR-PIO, the structure procedure is used serially. Next, the fuzzy like observer is selected to increase the accuracy of FOR structure PI observer (FOR-SPIO). Moreover, the adaptive technique is used to develop the reliability of the cascade (fuzzy-structure PI) observer. Additionally to fault identification, the machine-learning algorithm using a support vector machine (SVM) is recommended. The effectiveness of the adaptive cascade observer with the SVM fault identifier was validated by a vibration and AE datasets. Based on the results, the average vibration and AE fault diagnosis using the adaptive cascade observer with the SVM fault identifier are 97.8% and 97.65%, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:58:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5cc01c470d24612857707e3f11ac3e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:58:13Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a5cc01c470d24612857707e3f11ac3e82023-11-20T11:03:32ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-08-011017582710.3390/app10175827Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault ObserverFarzin Piltan0Jong-Myon Kim1Department of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, KoreaDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, KoreaIn this work, a hybrid procedure for bearing fault identification using a machine learning and adaptive cascade observer is explained. To design an adaptive cascade observer, the normal signal approximation is the first step. Therefore, the fuzzy orthonormal regressive (FOR) technique was developed to approximate the acoustic emission (AE) and vibration (non-stationary and nonlinear) bearing signals in normal conditions. After approximating the normal signal of bearing using the FOR technique, the adaptive cascade observer is modeled in four steps. First, the linear observation technique using a FOR proportional-integral (PI) observer (FOR-PIO) is developed. In the second step, to increase the power of uncertaintie rejection (robustness) of the FOR-PIO, the structure procedure is used serially. Next, the fuzzy like observer is selected to increase the accuracy of FOR structure PI observer (FOR-SPIO). Moreover, the adaptive technique is used to develop the reliability of the cascade (fuzzy-structure PI) observer. Additionally to fault identification, the machine-learning algorithm using a support vector machine (SVM) is recommended. The effectiveness of the adaptive cascade observer with the SVM fault identifier was validated by a vibration and AE datasets. Based on the results, the average vibration and AE fault diagnosis using the adaptive cascade observer with the SVM fault identifier are 97.8% and 97.65%, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/17/5827rotating machinebearingadaptive cascade observersupport vector machineproportional-integral (PI) observerstructure fault observer
spellingShingle Farzin Piltan
Jong-Myon Kim
Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer
Applied Sciences
rotating machine
bearing
adaptive cascade observer
support vector machine
proportional-integral (PI) observer
structure fault observer
title Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer
title_full Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer
title_fullStr Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer
title_full_unstemmed Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer
title_short Bearing Fault Identification Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Cascade Fault Observer
title_sort bearing fault identification using machine learning and adaptive cascade fault observer
topic rotating machine
bearing
adaptive cascade observer
support vector machine
proportional-integral (PI) observer
structure fault observer
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/17/5827
work_keys_str_mv AT farzinpiltan bearingfaultidentificationusingmachinelearningandadaptivecascadefaultobserver
AT jongmyonkim bearingfaultidentificationusingmachinelearningandadaptivecascadefaultobserver