Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)

Background: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin decreases time between induction of labor and delivery (TID) as compared to a vaginal dinoprostone insert in cases of premature rupture of membranes at term. Methods: This is a prospective, rand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric Devillard, Fanny Petillon, Marion Rouzaire, Bruno Pereira, Marie Accoceberry, Céline Houlle, Lydie Dejou-Bouillet, Pamela Bouchet, Amélie Delabaere, Denis Gallot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1525
_version_ 1797470547497451520
author Eric Devillard
Fanny Petillon
Marion Rouzaire
Bruno Pereira
Marie Accoceberry
Céline Houlle
Lydie Dejou-Bouillet
Pamela Bouchet
Amélie Delabaere
Denis Gallot
author_facet Eric Devillard
Fanny Petillon
Marion Rouzaire
Bruno Pereira
Marie Accoceberry
Céline Houlle
Lydie Dejou-Bouillet
Pamela Bouchet
Amélie Delabaere
Denis Gallot
author_sort Eric Devillard
collection DOAJ
description Background: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin decreases time between induction of labor and delivery (TID) as compared to a vaginal dinoprostone insert in cases of premature rupture of membranes at term. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial including patient undergoing labor induction for PROM at term with an unfavorable cervix in Clermont-Ferrand university hospital. We compared the double balloon catheter over a period of 12 h with adjunction of oxytocin 6 h after catheter insertion versus dinoprostone vaginal insert. After device ablation, cervical ripening continued only with oxytocin. The main outcome was TID. Secondary outcomes concerned delivery mode, as well as maternal and fetal outcome, and were adjusted for parity. Results: 40 patients per group were randomized. Each group had similar baseline characteristics. The study failed to demonstrate reduced TID (16.2 versus 20.2 h, ES = 0.16 (−0.27 to 0.60), <i>p</i> = 0.12) in the catheter group versus dinoprostone except in nulliparous women (17.0 versus 26.5 h, ES = 0.62 (0.10 to 1.14), <i>p</i> = 0.006). The rate of vaginal delivery <24 h significantly increased with combined induction (88.5% versus 66.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). No statistical difference was observed concerning caesarean rate (12.5% versus 17.5%, <i>p</i> > 0.05), chorioamnionitis (0% versus 2.5%, <i>p</i> = 1), postpartum endometritis, or maternal or neonatal outcomes. Procedure-related pain and tolerance to devices were found to be similar for the two methods. Interpretation: The double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin is an alternative for cervical ripening in case of PROM at term, and may reduce TID in nulliparous women.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:38:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5d1dce50c90410f9e7954d83a1aee98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:38:19Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a5d1dce50c90410f9e7954d83a1aee982023-11-24T01:47:33ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-03-01116152510.3390/jcm11061525Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)Eric Devillard0Fanny Petillon1Marion Rouzaire2Bruno Pereira3Marie Accoceberry4Céline Houlle5Lydie Dejou-Bouillet6Pamela Bouchet7Amélie Delabaere8Denis Gallot9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceBiostatistics Unit (DRCI), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceBackground: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin decreases time between induction of labor and delivery (TID) as compared to a vaginal dinoprostone insert in cases of premature rupture of membranes at term. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial including patient undergoing labor induction for PROM at term with an unfavorable cervix in Clermont-Ferrand university hospital. We compared the double balloon catheter over a period of 12 h with adjunction of oxytocin 6 h after catheter insertion versus dinoprostone vaginal insert. After device ablation, cervical ripening continued only with oxytocin. The main outcome was TID. Secondary outcomes concerned delivery mode, as well as maternal and fetal outcome, and were adjusted for parity. Results: 40 patients per group were randomized. Each group had similar baseline characteristics. The study failed to demonstrate reduced TID (16.2 versus 20.2 h, ES = 0.16 (−0.27 to 0.60), <i>p</i> = 0.12) in the catheter group versus dinoprostone except in nulliparous women (17.0 versus 26.5 h, ES = 0.62 (0.10 to 1.14), <i>p</i> = 0.006). The rate of vaginal delivery <24 h significantly increased with combined induction (88.5% versus 66.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). No statistical difference was observed concerning caesarean rate (12.5% versus 17.5%, <i>p</i> > 0.05), chorioamnionitis (0% versus 2.5%, <i>p</i> = 1), postpartum endometritis, or maternal or neonatal outcomes. Procedure-related pain and tolerance to devices were found to be similar for the two methods. Interpretation: The double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin is an alternative for cervical ripening in case of PROM at term, and may reduce TID in nulliparous women.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1525premature rupture of membraneslabor inductionunfavorable cervixcervical ripening balloonnulliparous
spellingShingle Eric Devillard
Fanny Petillon
Marion Rouzaire
Bruno Pereira
Marie Accoceberry
Céline Houlle
Lydie Dejou-Bouillet
Pamela Bouchet
Amélie Delabaere
Denis Gallot
Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
Journal of Clinical Medicine
premature rupture of membranes
labor induction
unfavorable cervix
cervical ripening balloon
nulliparous
title Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
title_full Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
title_fullStr Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
title_full_unstemmed Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
title_short Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
title_sort double balloon catheter plus oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for term rupture of membranes a randomized controlled trial rubapro
topic premature rupture of membranes
labor induction
unfavorable cervix
cervical ripening balloon
nulliparous
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1525
work_keys_str_mv AT ericdevillard doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT fannypetillon doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT marionrouzaire doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT brunopereira doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT marieaccoceberry doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT celinehoulle doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT lydiedejoubouillet doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT pamelabouchet doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT ameliedelabaere doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro
AT denisgallot doubleballooncatheterplusoxytocinversusdinoprostonevaginalinsertfortermruptureofmembranesarandomizedcontrolledtrialrubapro