Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance

BackgroundClostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated diarrheal disease prevalent worldwide. A common diagnostic algorithm relies on a two-step protocol that employs stool enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the pathogen, and its toxins, respectively. Active CDI is deemed le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farhan Anwar, Marielle Clark, Jason Lindsey, Rachel Claus-Walker, Asad Mansoor, Evy Nguyen, Justin Billy, William Lainhart, Kareem Shehab, V. K. Viswanathan, Gayatri Vedantam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1238159/full
_version_ 1797657477772214272
author Farhan Anwar
Marielle Clark
Jason Lindsey
Rachel Claus-Walker
Asad Mansoor
Evy Nguyen
Justin Billy
William Lainhart
Kareem Shehab
V. K. Viswanathan
V. K. Viswanathan
Gayatri Vedantam
Gayatri Vedantam
Gayatri Vedantam
author_facet Farhan Anwar
Marielle Clark
Jason Lindsey
Rachel Claus-Walker
Asad Mansoor
Evy Nguyen
Justin Billy
William Lainhart
Kareem Shehab
V. K. Viswanathan
V. K. Viswanathan
Gayatri Vedantam
Gayatri Vedantam
Gayatri Vedantam
author_sort Farhan Anwar
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundClostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated diarrheal disease prevalent worldwide. A common diagnostic algorithm relies on a two-step protocol that employs stool enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the pathogen, and its toxins, respectively. Active CDI is deemed less likely when the Toxin EIA result is negative, even if the pathogen-specific EIA is positive for C. difficile. We recently reported, however, that low-toxin-producing C. difficile strains recovered from Toxin-negative (‘discrepant’) clinical stool specimens can be fully pathogenic, and cause lethality in a rodent CDI model. To document frequency of discrepant CDI specimens, and evaluate C. difficile strain diversity, we performed longitudinal surveillance at a Southern Arizona tertiary-care hospital.MethodsDiarrheic stool specimens from patients with clinical suspicion of CDI were obtained over an eight-year period (2015–2022) from all inpatient and outpatient Units of a > 600-bed Medical Center in Southern Arizona. Clinical laboratory EIA testing identified C. difficile-containing specimens, and classified them as Toxin-positive or Toxin-negative. C. difficile isolates recovered from the stool specimens were DNA fingerprinted using an international phylogenetic lineage assignment system (“ribotyping”). For select isolates, toxin abundance in stationary phase supernatants of pure cultures was quantified via EIA.ResultsOf 8,910 diarrheic specimens that underwent diagnostic testing, 1733 (19.4%) harbored C. difficile. Our major findings were that: (1) C. difficile prevalence and phylogenetic diversity was stable over the 8-year period; (2) toxigenic C. difficile was recovered from 69% of clinically Tox-neg (‘discrepant’) specimens; (3) the six most prevalent USA ribotypes were recovered in significant proportions (>60%) from Tox-neg specimens; and (4) toxin–producing C. difficile recovered from discrepant specimens produced less toxin than strains of the same ribotype isolated from non-discrepant specimens.ConclusionOur study highlights the dominance of Toxin EIA-negative CDI specimens in a clinical setting and the high frequency of known virulent ribotypes in these specimens. Therefore, a careful reevaluation of the clinical relevance of diagnostically-discrepant specimens particularly in the context of missed CDI diagnoses and C. difficile persistence, is warranted.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:45:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a5d52939eab24928a9218ce0c859a840
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-858X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:45:04Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a5d52939eab24928a9218ce0c859a8402023-10-18T08:32:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2023-10-011010.3389/fmed.2023.12381591238159Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillanceFarhan Anwar0Marielle Clark1Jason Lindsey2Rachel Claus-Walker3Asad Mansoor4Evy Nguyen5Justin Billy6William Lainhart7Kareem Shehab8V. K. Viswanathan9V. K. Viswanathan10Gayatri Vedantam11Gayatri Vedantam12Gayatri Vedantam13School of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Pathology, Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesBio5 Institute for Collaborative Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesBio5 Institute for Collaborative Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSouthern Arizona VA Healthcare System, Tucson, AZ, United StatesBackgroundClostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated diarrheal disease prevalent worldwide. A common diagnostic algorithm relies on a two-step protocol that employs stool enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the pathogen, and its toxins, respectively. Active CDI is deemed less likely when the Toxin EIA result is negative, even if the pathogen-specific EIA is positive for C. difficile. We recently reported, however, that low-toxin-producing C. difficile strains recovered from Toxin-negative (‘discrepant’) clinical stool specimens can be fully pathogenic, and cause lethality in a rodent CDI model. To document frequency of discrepant CDI specimens, and evaluate C. difficile strain diversity, we performed longitudinal surveillance at a Southern Arizona tertiary-care hospital.MethodsDiarrheic stool specimens from patients with clinical suspicion of CDI were obtained over an eight-year period (2015–2022) from all inpatient and outpatient Units of a > 600-bed Medical Center in Southern Arizona. Clinical laboratory EIA testing identified C. difficile-containing specimens, and classified them as Toxin-positive or Toxin-negative. C. difficile isolates recovered from the stool specimens were DNA fingerprinted using an international phylogenetic lineage assignment system (“ribotyping”). For select isolates, toxin abundance in stationary phase supernatants of pure cultures was quantified via EIA.ResultsOf 8,910 diarrheic specimens that underwent diagnostic testing, 1733 (19.4%) harbored C. difficile. Our major findings were that: (1) C. difficile prevalence and phylogenetic diversity was stable over the 8-year period; (2) toxigenic C. difficile was recovered from 69% of clinically Tox-neg (‘discrepant’) specimens; (3) the six most prevalent USA ribotypes were recovered in significant proportions (>60%) from Tox-neg specimens; and (4) toxin–producing C. difficile recovered from discrepant specimens produced less toxin than strains of the same ribotype isolated from non-discrepant specimens.ConclusionOur study highlights the dominance of Toxin EIA-negative CDI specimens in a clinical setting and the high frequency of known virulent ribotypes in these specimens. Therefore, a careful reevaluation of the clinical relevance of diagnostically-discrepant specimens particularly in the context of missed CDI diagnoses and C. difficile persistence, is warranted.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1238159/fullClostridioides difficileprevalencesurveillanceribotypingdiscrepantlongitudinal
spellingShingle Farhan Anwar
Marielle Clark
Jason Lindsey
Rachel Claus-Walker
Asad Mansoor
Evy Nguyen
Justin Billy
William Lainhart
Kareem Shehab
V. K. Viswanathan
V. K. Viswanathan
Gayatri Vedantam
Gayatri Vedantam
Gayatri Vedantam
Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
Frontiers in Medicine
Clostridioides difficile
prevalence
surveillance
ribotyping
discrepant
longitudinal
title Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
title_full Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
title_fullStr Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
title_short Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
title_sort prevalence of diagnostically discrepant clostridioides difficile clinical specimens insights from longitudinal surveillance
topic Clostridioides difficile
prevalence
surveillance
ribotyping
discrepant
longitudinal
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1238159/full
work_keys_str_mv AT farhananwar prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT marielleclark prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT jasonlindsey prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT rachelclauswalker prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT asadmansoor prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT evynguyen prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT justinbilly prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT williamlainhart prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT kareemshehab prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT vkviswanathan prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT vkviswanathan prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT gayatrivedantam prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT gayatrivedantam prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance
AT gayatrivedantam prevalenceofdiagnosticallydiscrepantclostridioidesdifficileclinicalspecimensinsightsfromlongitudinalsurveillance