The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks

Recent time series observations of electric fields within collisionless shocks have shown that the fluctuating, electrostatic fields can be in excess of one hundred times that of the quasi-static electric fields. That is, the largest amplitude electric fields occur at high frequencies, not low. In c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynn B. Wilson, Li-Jen Chen, Vadim Roytershteyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2020.592634/full
Description
Summary:Recent time series observations of electric fields within collisionless shocks have shown that the fluctuating, electrostatic fields can be in excess of one hundred times that of the quasi-static electric fields. That is, the largest amplitude electric fields occur at high frequencies, not low. In contrast, many if not most kinetic simulations show the opposite, where the quasi-static electric fields dominate, unless they are specifically tailored to examine small-scale instabilities. Further, the shock ramp thickness is often observed to fall between the electron and ion scales while many simulations tend to produce ramp thicknesses at least at or above ion scales. This raises numerous questions about the role of small-scale instabilities and about the ability to directly compare simulations with observations.
ISSN:2296-987X